Toggle sidebar Toggle sidebar
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

Anthropic Debuts Claude Design for Creating Prototypes, Pitch Decks, and Mockups

MacRumors

MacRumors

macrumors bot
Original poster


Anthropic today launched Claude Design, a new AI product for creating designs, prototypes, slides, and more. Claude Design uses Opus 4.7, a new AI model that was introduced earlier this week.


Opus 4.7 is Anthropic's most capable vision model, and it can see images in greater resolution. Anthropic says that it is "more tasteful and creative" when doing professional tasks. It is able to create higher-quality interfaces, slides, and docs, making it ideal for Claude Design. Claude Design was developed to allow founders, product managers, and marketers without a design background to create visuals for sharing an idea.

Claude Design is able to mock up an initial design after being provided with a prompt, and from there, designers can make revisions through conversation, comments, direct edits, and custom sliders made by Claude. Anthropic says that teams have been using Claude Design for realistic prototypes, wireframes and mockups, design explorations, pitch decks, presentations, social media assets, and more.

Working with Claude Design starts with brand assets, which Claude can get from the user's design files and codebase. Projects will use brand colors, typography, and other components, plus users can use a web capture tool to pull elements directly from their brand's website. Claude Design is not an image generator like Gemini's Nano Banana or ChatGPT, but it is similar to AI assistants that Adobe and Canva have rolled out.

There are included collaboration tools so multiple members of an organization can access and edit a design, and content created by Claude can be exported anywhere with support for Canva, PDF, PPTX, and standalone HTML files. Designs that are ready to build can be handed off to Claude Code, and Anthropic plans to make it easier to build integrations with Claude Design in the coming weeks.

Claude Design is available as a research preview for Claude Pro, Max, Team, and Enterprise subscribers. It is rolling out to users gradually throughout the day.

Article Link: Anthropic Debuts Claude Design for Creating Prototypes, Pitch Decks, and Mockups
 
Article Link
https://www.macrumors.com/2026/04/17/anthropic-claude-design/
  • Angry
  • Haha
Reactions: jw2002 and Z-4195
Wow, this is awesome, especially if you can export the graphs in several formats.

Lately Anthropic is launching great products, and the only caveat are their lower usage limits relative to OpenAI and Google. But so far it’s my favorite tool.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Macalicious2011
IncreasinglyFrustrated said:
Pretty fair to say everyone in digital/web creation should be crapping their pants right now; including the tool makers.
Click to expand...


No. Chat bots have been able to supply code for design for two-three years. Look how long Windsurf and Cursor have been around for.

Companies like Canva or Figma can do the same thing with custom models and also offer a choice of different providers.

It always requires a designer with good taste and experience to use these AI tools. The models are absolutely crap at designing on their own and need instructions so that they match each project’s spec. Just look at how ugly vibe coded apps are in the hands of clowns.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Njiphoner, MaximizedAction, shadowbird423 and 10 others
Macalicious2011 said:
Anthropic is going after everyone’s lunch. Their new model, mythos, is clearly cooking up new amazing features/products every week.

We are barely through a quarter of 2026. What will Claude be like in December 2026? 😱
Click to expand...

Mythos is not available to the public and is only being used within private contracts for code checking and cybersecurity purposes.

But — WOW! — Anthropic is on fire! 🔥 That demo video alone is amazingly produced! That entire UI is web-based? I wonder how much AI is being used to create these new tools? I bet a lot given the pace of releases. Such an advanced product would have taken a year to build just a year ago!

I'm more worried about Apple falling further behind in this fast-paced AI race, but then again... I bet these companies are accelerated by using Macs to build this cool stuff!
 
JMalone said:
No. Chat bots have been able to supply code for design for two-three years. Look how long Windsurf and Cursor have been around for.

Companies like Canva or Figma can do the same thing with custom models and also offer a choice of different providers.

It always requires a designer with good taste and experience to use these AI tools. The models are absolutely crap at designing on their own and need instructions so that they match each project’s spec. Just look at how ugly vibe coded apps are in the hands of clowns.
Click to expand...
While I won't go as far to refer to others as clowns. AI isn't alive so it cannot have its own taste and creativity. It's a model. This is why I'd like to see Apple attempt a drag-and-drop design app you can also speak inputs to. It could be very powerful for creatives if Apple focused on it seriously. Even just basic stuff such as telling the app what size this item should be and being able to speak hex, Pantone or RAL color codes and radius curves and gradients and then drag to adjust to fine tune toward your goal.

Over time Apple could potentially anonymously collect spoken user inputs users rated positively, and use those to shape the model to carry out desired instructions users might have. The app could learn what a user might mean by "make this a bit more curved" or "make the color more pleasant" or "give this more pop". Not rocket science just statistics with the foundation of the app being fully drag-and-drop from start to finish. So a user could add as much or as little vocal input as they prefer.

After Apple got rid of iWeb many years ago I've been waiting for them to throw their hat in the drag-and-drop design ring again. The concept of iWeb could be the basis of a very powerful design app from Apple. With their new Apple Creator Studio now may be the time.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Populus
JMalone said:
It always requires a designer with good taste and experience to use these AI tools. The models are absolutely crap at designing on their own and need instructions so that they match each project’s spec. Just look at how ugly vibe coded apps are in the hands of clowns.
Click to expand...
Exactly. People looking to design on cheap will get what they want pay for; if you aren’t willing to spend the time to think through your pitch , what does that say about your dedication to making things that are unique and great?

crsh1976 said:
Sure, until everybody hits the wall where everything from everyone looks the same no matter how well made it is.

Talented designers are not getting replaced.
Click to expand...

If anything they will. E more valuable and AI a tool they use to do some grunts work.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Apple Knowledge Navigator and jw2002
Check out this great calculator design they have in their Examples section
1776460462781.png
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Reactions: MaximizedAction, wlossw, surfbutler and 23 others
Populus said:
Wow, this is awesome, especially if you can export the graphs in several formats.

Lately Anthropic is launching great products, and the only caveat are their lower usage limits relative to OpenAI and Google. But so far it’s my favorite tool.
Click to expand...

That only caveat it's a giant elephant in the room: it means they bleed money every day because the compute is heavily subsidize by VC money: i.e: there's no working business model, because if they would charge what it actually costs no body would use it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: freedomlinux, DBR2025, locovaca and 1 other person
At the moment all these AI companies are pouring billions of dollars of VC money into AI so that they can be the 'last man standing' with the deepest pockets, but eventually they will start raising their subscriptions and price individuals out of the market. Then design studios will be the only ones that can justify thousands of dollars a month for unlimited server access. That'll probably re-balance the market back to the capitalism we all know and love.

Bad analogy, but maybe it will be like streaming back in the 2010s - Netflix had the whole video market in the palm of their hands. Nearly every film available for $10 a month. DVD / Blu Ray sales tanking. Fast forward 15 years and we're overrun with streaming platforms and it would be prohibitively expensive to have them all.
 
So more cheeseburgers created by an AI trained on thousands of derivative cheeseburgers? Cool.

The future of software design will be in the hands of those who can still use Photoshop.
 
iZac said:
At the moment all these AI companies are pouring billions of dollars of VC money into AI so that they can be the 'last man standing' with the deepest pockets, but eventually they will start raising their subscriptions and price individuals out of the market. Then design studios will be the only ones that can justify thousands of dollars a month for unlimited server access. That'll probably re-balance the market back to the capitalism we all know and love.

Bad analogy, but maybe it will be like streaming back in the 2010s - Netflix had the whole video market in the palm of their hands. Nearly every film available for $10 a month. DVD / Blu Ray sales tanking. Fast forward 15 years and we're overrun with streaming platforms and it would be prohibitively expensive to have them all.
Click to expand...
And look at what Netflix has become after topping the market. They added ads, frequently raise their prices, and have lost that 'underdog' vibe that many of us rooted for. Same thing is happening to T-Mobile (anyone remember the Uncarrier ads?). Yes, they offer good services but have changed from a customer focus to bottom line focus and it's sad to see. If Netflix wasn't included in my phone plan I wouldn't keep it. I expect the same thing is going to happen in the AI field. Once you corner the market you can use that position to make back all that investment capital by hiking prices and there will be less competition, making it easier.
 
  • Like
Reactions: rumz
SirROM said:
And look at what Netflix has become after topping the market. They added ads, frequently raise their prices, and have lost that 'underdog' vibe that many of us rooted for. Same thing is happening to T-Mobile (anyone remember the Uncarrier ads?). Yes, they offer good services but have changed from a customer focus to bottom line focus and it's sad to see. If Netflix wasn't included in my phone plan I wouldn't keep it. I expect the same thing is going to happen in the AI field. Once you corner the market you can use that position to make back all that investment capital by hiking prices and there will be less competition, making it easier.
Click to expand...
Yeah, on the basic tier users will only get access to the budget models which scraped public domain content. Pay for the advanced tiers and you’ll get access to the models that have copyrighted content that the AI company paid Disney for access to.

Since the inception of this current wave of AI, I’ve been confident there will be a new job market where creative humans are hired to just feed fresh content into the AI models.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.
Top Bottom
Back