good business sense is to funnel as many people as possible to the more expensive product. and that is not an example of Apple *screwing* their customers, it's just the way sales works.
They wont offer the matte option on the normal Macbooks. Thats another reason why people get a pro.
good business sense is to funnel as many people as possible to the more expensive product. and that is not an example of Apple *screwing* their customers, it's just the way sales works.
Not really. I can afford ANY Mac product. I just like the size of the Macbook for portability and I like the built in superdrive. Sometimes the best isnt the better choice.
Power Support Anti-Glare Film for the unibody MacBook. It's not exactly BTO, but it does the job and the reviews I've read are nothing short of glowing. Not to mention it's cheaper than Apple's $50 BTO option for the 17" MBP.
Did you notice any loss of picture quality?I'd like to add a recommendation for Power Support's anti-glare film. I've got one for a MacBook, and it's wonderful. It's a royal pain to get it on without dust or bubbles (advice: line up the longest edge of the film first), but once it's on it's virtually indistinguishable from an actual matte screen.
EXACTLY! Even if the prices were switched (macbook pro = 1599, macbook = 1999) I wouldn't get the macbook pro because portability is very important to me in a notebook. I don't understand why apple doesn't understand this.
EXACTLY! Even if the prices were switched (macbook pro = 1599, macbook = 1999) I wouldn't get the macbook pro because portability is very important to me in a notebook. I don't understand why apple doesn't understand this.
And don't tell me to get a MBA. Nice machine but not really comparable to the full function of the other notebooks
Did you notice any loss of picture quality?
others have reported that it makes the screen a bit blurry/fuzzy.
Did you notice any loss of picture quality?