Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
1,300 games but “. . . the service offers only a handful of games for consoles like the NES, SNES, Game Boy, and PS1”

Is this a contradiction or just meaning that others are early home computer (ie C64) titles?
When I looked at the list - the SNES and PS1 titles were very sparse. Did see a lot of Amiga and DOS titles.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Victor Mortimer
I signed up because of the arcade games they have, not because of the home console stuff. I never thought I'd ever get to play my beloved Rastan or Zoo Keeper again.
 
Sadly, the game list is so light, I don't see anything I want to play so much that I would subscribe.

If they had the original Atari 8-bit Star Raiders and Starglider for the Amiga, I might have subscribed for a month. Even the MSX catalog was almost empty.
 
Even if a game hasn't been sold for a long time, even if its original publisher is out of business, there's a chance that another company purchased the rights (or even bought out the old company) and is watching the emulation scene with interest, getting ready to sell a collection of their own.

"A chance"
"is watching with interest"
"(maybe) getting ready to sell a collection"

None of that = "available to purchase"

Honestly, rules around IP are completely overboard
At some point, it all needs to expire and enter the public domain

Are we really wanting some random generational Nintendo descendant suing someone for playing a 200 year old Mario ROM in 2185?
 
I wonder what the licensing deal is and how much the developers are compensated for their original work. And what about devs that are no longer operating.
 
What about ScummVR?
I found a ScummVM, is that open source? Then, I was really talking about how people could get music for “free” and all iTunes did was make a solution where the biggest difference was that iTunes made music easier to find for a price. It appears that, while folks can find their own roms, this apps does that for the user for a price.
 
Perhaps instead of splitting hairs on legality we should be discussing morality and ethics instead.

IMO taking and using others IP without their specific permission clearly is neither ethical nor moral. Just my $0.02 but I feel strongly about it. I do not consider viewing imagery or listening to audio once/twice to be theft of IP. IMO the IP theft occurs if/when the imagery/audio gets saved to mass storage; or worse, edited without specific permission to access the original work.
I don’t have any gray areas like that. :) If I take an action to view or listen to content while intentionally avoiding the steps to license/own it, I’ve tried to not be legal. I know no one is going to come after me for it, but that doesn’t change the legality of it.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.