Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

Any issue with jailbroken/unlocked iPhone and AppleCare?

  • AppleCare granted warranty and support to my jailbroken/unlocked iPhone

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • AppleCare denied/voided warranty and support to my jailbroken/unlocked iPhone

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • I did not attempt to get warranty support yet on my jailbroken/unlocked iPhone

    Votes: 5 100.0%

  • Total voters
    5

slipper

macrumors 68000
Original poster
Nov 19, 2003
1,563
44
So now that it is ok to jailbreak and unlock your iPhone has anyone had any issues with AppleCare denying coverage, straight out voiding warranty, or making unwarranted claims that the software modification has damaged your iPhone?
 
First, the ruling only stated that jailbreaking your iPhone is not in violation of the DMCA. It stated nothing else in regards to the legality or illegality of jailbreaking under any other laws.

Secondly, jailbreaking your phone still does void your warranty with Apple. However, if you restore your phone before you give it to them for repair then they probably will not know that you jailbroke it.
 
Heh? OK maybe i don't fully understand the situation. So the government can pass a law and Apple is free to do whatever they want?

From my understanding from what i read it is ok to jailbreak and unlock BUT if Apple can prove the software modification has permanently damaged your iPhone then they can void AppleCare.
 
Heh? OK maybe i don't fully understand the situation. So the government can pass a law and Apple is free to do whatever they want?

From my understanding from what i read it is ok to jailbreak and unlock BUT if Apple can prove the software modification has permanently damaged your iPhone then they can void AppleCare.

Previously, by the wording of the DCMA, Apple could of sued the dev team and/or you for bypassing copyright protection. This is the same law/act (DCMA) that prevents you from utilizing your fair use/back up rights.

The government merely said that taking that option is no longer available to Apple.

It did not require Apple to service such devices under it's warranty, which would be outside the scope of the government's proper reach anyway.
 
Previously, by the wording of the DCMA, Apple could of sued the dev team and/or you for bypassing copyright protection. This is the same law/act (DCMA) that prevents you from utilizing your fair use/back up rights.

The government merely said that taking that option is no longer available to Apple.

It did not require Apple to service such devices under it's warranty, which would be outside the scope of the government's proper reach anyway.

This
The government cant tell apple what it has to warranty. Apple could very well say that starting tomorrow the iphone will be sold without any kind of warranty what-so-ever and the federal government cant do anything about it. Needless to say the regime in office now would try but hopefully fail.
 
This
The government cant tell apple what it has to warranty. Apple could very well say that starting tomorrow the iphone will be sold without any kind of warranty what-so-ever and the federal government cant do anything about it. Needless to say the regime in office now would try but hopefully fail.

Those closest the government comes to telling someone what/how they are to warranty anything is if they claim a "Full" warranty - that has a specific minimum meaning under federal law.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.