Hence the "tend to" bit.
In my experience the non militant vegan is very much the minority. Most of the time they use information from PETA, ALF and other such organisations to prove points. Yet when I use information from the British Meat Education Service I get accused of using biased sources!![]()
I've encountered way more militant meat-eaters than I ever have militant vegetarians. Actually, I've encountered more militant meat-eaters than I've ever encountered vegetarians, period.
I think this is one of those cases where the vocal minority is so ridiculously vocal that they give the rest of us a bad name. I can't stand PETA, and I know a couple very outspoken and "activist" vegans who's actions and attitudes really bug me. I myself have never been to an animal rights protest or harranged anyone about their choices, and I'm willing to bet the majority of vegetarians are the same.
But there is something that I think is overlooked here. When you're a vegetarian or vegan, you are constantly under fire to justify your lifestyle, sometimes even by perfect strangers. You have to explain yourself at family and social gatherings, people are constantly asking (sometimes intentionally insulting) questions about your food, and any indication that you're sick, or unhealthy in any way -- or any other vegetarian that they've ever heard of is -- is used as justification to berate you. And if you respond in a way that is flippant or annoyed, you get lumped in with the "militants".
Kind of a no-win situation. I want to carry around a glove and slap offenders with it, exclaiming in a Monty Python-esque voice "I challenge you to a duel!" that involves which one of us can bounce more quarters off our washboard abs.