Anyone buying Google Glass on April 15?

Discussion in 'Alternatives to iOS and iOS Devices' started by xraydoc, Apr 13, 2014.

  1. xraydoc macrumors demi-god

    xraydoc

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2005
    Location:
    192.168.1.1
    #1
    So the Google Glass Explorer Edition is being sold to the public for one day only on Tuesday, April 15. Costs $1500 (same as current developer/explorer price).

    Anyone have any notion to buy one. I'm thinking of it. I may even be able to get a paper out of it (usage in a medical imaging setting).
     
  2. maflynn Moderator

    maflynn

    Staff Member

    Joined:
    May 3, 2009
    Location:
    Boston
    #2
    I see little need and I have little desire to spend that much money something that has limited appeal to me.
     
  3. SandboxGeneral Moderator

    SandboxGeneral

    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2010
    Location:
    Orbiting a G-type Main Sequence Star
    #3
    Nope. I don't see a need for it, nor do I really have a want for it - especially for the price. It's a neat device to be sure though.
     
  4. Shrink macrumors G3

    Shrink

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2011
    Location:
    New England, USA
    #4
    Nope..I don't find taking my phone out of my pocket to be a burden.
     
  5. tbayrgs macrumors 603

    tbayrgs

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2009
    Location:
    Florida, USA
    #5
    Agreed, especially not a $1500 burden. :eek:
     
  6. mrkramer macrumors 603

    mrkramer

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2006
    Location:
    Somewhere
    #6
    I really don't see the point in it except for using it to take pictures of people without them knowing, and you could get an SLR with a long lens for not much more and just hide in some bushes to do that instead.
     
  7. xraydoc thread starter macrumors demi-god

    xraydoc

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2005
    Location:
    192.168.1.1
    #7
    Yeah, I'm looking at it from an academic point of view. For strictly personal stuff I wouldn't need it. But from a medical research perspective, it might be interesting.
     
  8. Dontazemebro macrumors 68020

    Dontazemebro

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2010
    Location:
    I dunno, somewhere in West Texas
    #8
    Interested but not at that Explorer price. There's nothing compelling about paying $1500 just to say hey, look at me, I'm an early adopter.
     
  9. rhinosrcool macrumors 65816

    rhinosrcool

    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2009
    Location:
    MN
    #9
    No, even though I like new technology, these things are creepy. Yes, today, I realize there isn't a lot of privacy. But , these things go too far. In the future, people could (and probably will) irreparably harm someone's reputation with tweaking of their public information.
     
  10. Vegastouch macrumors 603

    Vegastouch

    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2008
    Location:
    Las Vegas, NV
    #10
    No

    ----------

    Thats why i have no interest in a smart watch either.
     
  11. SlCKB0Y macrumors 68040

    SlCKB0Y

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2012
    Location:
    Sydney, Australia
    #11
    Except there are plenty of applications where you might not be able to use your hands.
     
  12. mrkramer macrumors 603

    mrkramer

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2006
    Location:
    Somewhere
    #12
    The majority of which you probably shouldn't be using a phone during.
     
  13. maflynn Moderator

    maflynn

    Staff Member

    Joined:
    May 3, 2009
    Location:
    Boston
    #13
    Please define such, If you're unable to use your hands to research something, then perhaps its not the proper place to be researching. I can think of driving to be a great example.

    Perhaps I'm being narrow minded so what examples did you have in mind?
     
  14. T'hain Esh Kelch macrumors 601

    T'hain Esh Kelch

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2001
    Location:
    Denmark
    #14
    I see the potential for when working in a laboratory, but not an early-adopter-1500$-potential. Not in any way.

    Let me pull up protocols on the fly and note results, then yes.
     
  15. kdarling macrumors demi-god

    kdarling

    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2007
    Location:
    First university coding class = 46 years ago
    #15
    Google should add a recording light just to quell the fears of people who've never seen Glass before. However, the display already lights up, which is a hint.

    Watch this Glass review and see her example of "secret filming" at around 2:25. There's also a hilarious part at 3:00 when her boyfriend figures out something, and you'll see it light up taking a picture. Keep watching and she'll give more examples right after.



    Yep. For example, a field technician or researcher might be up a ladder or pole, and need to do / ask about something.

    I believe there's a surgeon who's used it already to record pieces of an operation for others to see.

    In general, Glass is not quite what most people think. It's not virtual reality or anything like that. It's a very simple device, using mostly card info like Google Now, or the upcoming Google wearable stuff like the Moto 360.
     
  16. maflynn Moderator

    maflynn

    Staff Member

    Joined:
    May 3, 2009
    Location:
    Boston
    #16
    Perhaps but do you really want to be so distracted on researching something while up on a ladder? I don't think that would be too safe.

    Likewise if you're researcher with gloves on mixing compounds or chemicals - have your attention diverted may not be the best course of action.
     
  17. kdarling macrumors demi-god

    kdarling

    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2007
    Location:
    First university coding class = 46 years ago
    #17
    I've been doing field apps for coming up on twenty years. Wearable computing has always been a desire, whether hands on or off.

    Previously we used just voice control. Example: telephone worker up a pole, needs to know which lines are free to reuse, vocally asks for a list and it's read back. With Glass, the same thing, except they can see the list as well IF THEY WISH.

    Hmm. Perhaps some people do not realize that the display is NOT in front of your eye. It's just above the normal line of sight. It doesn't block your straight ahead vision.

    Obviously if you're in a job where any distraction is bad, you wouldn't be wearing one :)

    Like anything, it's not a device that fits in every situation. However, it's just silly to broadly claim that there's no use for it at all, or that it's less safe. It can be safer (and more convenient) than taking a hand off a handhold or a piece of equipment in order to pull out a separate display device.
     
  18. mattbaar26 macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2013
    #18
    I think it's a great idea, it seems like everyone dissing it here is afraid of what it can do, it would be interesting to see all of your replies once apple comes out with something similar to this.

    The point of glass isn't to take pictures of people...
     
  19. mrkramer macrumors 603

    mrkramer

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2006
    Location:
    Somewhere
    #19
    It isn't too hard to change that...
     
  20. chrf097 macrumors 68040

    chrf097

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2011
    #20
    Google Glass is a great application. It has many uses but honestly most of those uses I think go beyond consumer/prosumers and are better suited in business.

    The application of Google Glass is better suited for the heavy duty workers, scientists doing research, etc. I don't think Google Glass is ready nor needed for daily life, especially with projects like the Pebble, Galaxy Gear, Android Wear, iWatch, etc. that can fill the gap in a more cost-effective, efficient manner.

    My main issue is with how many people are going to buy this DEVELOPER device and then run online to complain about it's issues. Google Glass Explorer Edition is NOT a consumer device. By letting anyone buy it, Google is saying "Yeah it's ready!" and it's definitely not.

    I'd rather wait for the Moto 360 instead of Google Glass.
     
  21. ucfgrad93 macrumors P6

    ucfgrad93

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2007
    Location:
    Colorado
    #21
    Agreed. I pretty much have no interest in Glass at any price.
     
  22. Jessica Lares macrumors G3

    Jessica Lares

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2009
    Location:
    Near Dallas, Texas, USA
    #22
    The price tag is so high, that I think we will see less abuse than if it was something people could get for $500 or less. So while I agree with chrf097, that there will be some people buying this and trying to use it as a daily driver, this will be less of an issue then people flashing half working ROMs on their device.

    I'm not interested either. I already hate wearing glasses as it is, plus I'm legally blind in one eye/totally blind in the other.
     
  23. spinedoc77 macrumors G3

    spinedoc77

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 2009
    #23
    It's way too expensive for what it does, but that's how technology works. In a couple of years it will be $499. Still, even if it was cheaper I wouldn't buy one. It looks horribly ridiculous. It doesn't fit very well. I had a chance to try out my brothers (which sits in one of his dusty drawers doing nothing) and it didn't impress me in the least. At least with smartwatches you can make a case for owning one, but I just can't see anyone needing one of these.
     
  24. Smeehehe macrumors member

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2014
    #24
    Rock climbing. Swimming.
     
  25. mrkramer macrumors 603

    mrkramer

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2006
    Location:
    Somewhere
    #25
    I would never go climbing with someone who is trying to use something like Google Glass, I value my life too much. That is a situation where you should be paying attention to what you are doing, and I can't imagine any situation where you would need to look something up as you were either climbing or belaying. Using Google glass there would end with someone getting killed or severely injured.
     

Share This Page