Anyone disappointed with multitasking?

I don't recall the very first iPhone having the button take you to the first page. I thought that came along with apps (which was 3G) because why else would you need to get to the first page if you only have one page?

 

No, it only keeps your most recent 4 apps multi-tasked, as I understand it, and it also keeps your place in those apps - so if your typing a note and switch to a different app and come back, the note is right there in the same place without relaunching the app.

As for the Home button, if you press it once, it still functions as the same old Home button.

 

Anyone that isnt a fanboy, yes. With that said, holy crap learn how to present your ideas properly formatted. That wall of text is nearly unreadable.

 

There is no set number of apps. It is as many as it can store in memory.

 

No harm in tossing a paragraph in here and there. They're free. It's impossible to read otherwise.

 

lol.

You want multitasking, but think the implementation is not intuitive. I think a little slide out drawer is easier to manage then a large list of Apps. But, I haven't used it yet, so maybe I will be disappointed as well.

 

Although multitasking on the iPhone is not true multitasking, I think the iPhone does a great job and the best I've used.

Actually, if you think about it, on a mobile device that is not meant to be a work horse (although it can be to an extent on the iPhone!) the iPhone does a great job. It preserves battery and only allows essential things that people might use, like music, task finishing, local updates and not having a game that runs in the background just draining juice.

I think the most important feature is the fast-app switching. I've been using iOS 4.0 and I find it does a great job. It makes the phone "appear" to be so much faster because you don't have to wait for Apps to load. Honestly, on a phone people only use 1 app at a time, there's just not much room for anything else, and if you need anything else, those certain APIs Apple provided are more than enough!

So I disagree with you, I have used many "smartphones" in the past, and the ones that enable multi-tasking are horrendous. You constantly have to seek and destroy Apps that are sucking up juice.

I'm interested to hear how you think multitasking could have been done better on the iPhone.

 

agreed! lol I just cannot read that.

 

But the Home button has had multiple uses at least since the iPhone 3G. You could set the Home button when double-tapped to go to the iPod app, search, phone favorites or camera. On the 3GS I believe the default behavior for double-tapping the Home button is the voice control app. So I mean it has been done before. Is it perfect? No, but how would you have implemented it? A specific gesture on the screen? A new button?

From what I understand you can continue to use the home button as a home button if you so desire. Then use the home screen to go to the apps just as you have done since day one, multitasking will behave the same as if you has select the app from the multitasking list.


As for multitasking itself on the OS level, I think it's a fine implementation. Android doesn't have what most would consider "true" multitasking either, yes it's a lot closer to it but it has its own limitations and flaws. Microsoft went the route of the original iPhone, not allowing background applications but implementing the same fast app switching present in iOS4. WebOS, not sure how they implemented it. Point is a mobile device doesn't need full multitasking the way we are used to it on a desktop because you will never "see" more than one application at a time. Is the current implementation perfect? Probably not, I can foresee Apple making changes (adding multitasking options) down the line when developers start demanding more pipelines for their apps to perform tasks when the user is away.

 

I think there may be some confusion here with the original iphone and the original iPhone OS (now iOS).

When the original iPhone launched there was not multi-home pages. There was only one home page. Multiple home pages were introduced in a subsequent software update.

 

I'm listening to the iPod on my iPad while I'm typing this, that's as much multitasking that I can personally ask for.

 

This post made my eyes hurt. Paragraphs are your friends.

 

I am. Not to sound like an idiot, but I don't really even understand how it works. I just see that almost all my memory is taken up. When I click the home button, I have phone, SMS, mail, and FourSquare showing up. Maybe I won't see the full effect until I use an app like Pandora or something.

 

This is wrong. IIRC You can only have 11 pages.

 

I mean, really. I am amazed by the people who actually read through that.
Good job people.

 

Apple added 2 things here:

A) Multitasking ability

B) A quick app-switcher

You clearly don't like 'B.' Ok, so don't use it. I rarely use that 'search' page they added. No big deal. I just don't go over there. If I don't like this new app-switcher I'll stop double-clicking my home button and I'll never see it.

So what's the problem?

No, multitasking is like multitasking and the recently-used-apps-list is like a recently-used-apps-list.

You seem to be calling 2 different things by a single name.

It sounds like you want the app-switching interface to be better.

Ok. But then your thread title shouldn't say "multitasking" in it. You didn't mention any problem with that in your post.

 

Use it however you want. Thats the point people have made. Yes it could be used as a home screen return key (which is what I use it as) or other commonly used apps. Whats the beef?

I dont see myself the folders a whole lot. I can see me still having a full home screen page 1 of apps I use daily and probably a page 2 of the same. Will likely only use folders for apps that aren't as used, leaving room for more that are.

Blonde Buddhist

 

Soooo let me get this straight...your complaining because the iPhone isn't being simplistic enough? It's probably the most dumb downed phone I've ever used.

You say multitasking is taking away from the "home" feel as well, ok I don't understand that either because if you click it once...your back at your home screen. Right? So what's the issue? Just don't double click lol.

And another thing, even if it could run 30 apps at the same time; well more or less "saving your place" in those apps, flipping your finger sideways is too much of a hassle?

Geez dude, I was born into the new tech era but are we really complaining about swiping are finger now? lol

 

Are you talking about Push or webOS' notification system? They are separate things.

 

You're wrong.

11 pages of what? Do you know what everyone is talking about? No, you don't. Pre iOS 4 you could have 11 pages of apps. You've cleverly remembered the number 11. Bravo.

We're talking about multitasking, and in the multitasking 'dock' you can have as many apps running as memory can handle.

 

I just realized how hard it is to reply to posts with the amount of venom and vile hatred as is seemingly required to post on macrumors...don't know if I want to be a part of this place. I tried.

 

To be honest, I couldn't care less about multi-tasking. What I want is quick task switching. Having to go back to the Home screen and hunt back the app I used previously is annoying. The task switching in iOS4 seems to fit the bill. Now, the 2nd problem is the notification. Let's face it, current iOS' way of doing notification is like a dumbphone.