Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Status
Not open for further replies.
It’s not basic science. Leonard Sax’s ideas are outside of the mainstream in psychology and quite controversial, and as far as I know, even he didn’t get into color. Perhaps you can cite his writings on gender and color?

You‘re stating these things as facts, but they are not. I posted some actual historical facts earlier in the thread about a time in the early 20th century when boys were associated with pink and girls with blue. You seem to be ignoring that completely.

As a previous posted stated, most of the posted links are not scientific papers, so citing them as “basic science” betrays a lack of understanding of what basic science actually is.
This. @eicca needs to take a breath and think more deeply about what he/she is saying
 
I posted info about how pink used to be associated with boys and blue with girls in the early 20th century. Why have you refused to address that? Fact is, the blue-boys, pink-girls thing was all marketing. If you want to think certain colors are feminine or masculine, feel free to believe it. But that’s just your personal belief. You’ve been seasoned to believe that; it hasn’t always been the case and will likely change multiple times in the future.
What is there to address? What does any of that have to do with anything?
 
  • Like
Reactions: qoop
Even the silver version, maybe because of the white bezels, is hard to imagine in a guy’s room or office.

I’m not opposed to color, but the particular colors chosen and the pastel-looking tone of the stands. It just veers pretty hard into the feminine lane.

Black bezels and a black Apple logo on the front might go a long way to improve the silver iMac to my macho manly eyes.

Who even thinks up dumb stuff like this? 10/10 comedy, well done.
 
What is there to address? What does any of that have to do with anything?
You are claiming that certain colors are feminine. This shows that colors are neither feminine or masculine innately. It is a social construct. If you were a boy in the late 1800s or early 1900s, you’d have worn a white dress as a little kid. And if you were a little boy between 1920 and 1940, likely would have been dressed in pink. So your association of colors with gender is not absolute. It‘s a product of marketing from the 1940s forward.
 
You are claiming that certain colors are feminine. This shows that colors are neither feminine or masculine innately. It is a social construct. If you were a boy in the late 1800s or early 1900s, you’d have worn a dress as a little kid. And if you were a little boy between 1920 and 1940, likely would have been dressed in pink. So your association of colors with gender is not absolute. It‘s a product of marketing from the 1940s forward.
Not a single thing you're saying is revelatory. Nor am I a time traveler. Forgive me for not explicitly stating that I'm posting from the year 2021.

The new iMacs look feminine to me. What else can I tell you? Attempting to explain *why* they appear feminine is a distraction at best.
 
  • Like
Reactions: qoop and OdT22
Not a single thing you're saying is revelatory. Nor am I a time traveler. Forgive me for not explicitly stating that I'm posting from the year 2021.

The new iMacs look feminine to me. What else can I tell you? Attempting to explain *why* they appear feminine is a distraction at best.
That hasn’t been the issue with the posts made here so far. You’ve told other people that they also must see them as feminine.

The bedroom is clearly feminine. We know it's feminine. You know it's feminine. We know that you know it's feminine. Yet you continue to hold the line, despite how transparent it is. Fascinating from a psychological perspective.

Sorry, no. That’s your personal opinion. Don’t tell everybody on the forum that they agree with you. Most posters on this thread so far do not. It is fascinating psychologically that YOU are so convinced that these colors are feminine, and that everybody else agrees with you, even after being presented with data that such things are totally subjective and change over time… and reading many many posts of people that disagree with you.
 
That hasn’t been the issue with the posts made here so far. You’ve told other people that they also must see them as feminine.
LOL. I haven't told anyone that they must do anything.

Sorry, no. That’s your personal opinion. Don’t tell everybody on the forum that they agree with you. Most posters on this thread so far do not. It is fascinating psychologically that YOU are so convinced that these colors are feminine, and that everybody else agrees with you, even after being presented with data that such things are totally subjective and change over time.
Sorry, yes. People are free to be as disingenuous as they'd like. I'm not playing along.
 
  • Like
Reactions: qoop and OdT22
Yeah it seems Apple would make the new iMac essentially a large consumer product for basic activities like free time, education and office work.
The product showed some hours ago is no longer a professional machine both in marketing presentation and in hardware configuration.
The variety of colors isn't a problem.
The problem is a horrible design, limited hardware potentiality and no possibility to upgrade later by user or to repair by third party suppliers.
And if you choose the entry level iMac with 8 GB RAM and 256 GB SSD (estimated 150 TBW) prepare yourself to throw it into the trash can in a couple of years.
In my personal opinion it's literally a plastic toy and a waste of money.
You just described what I thought the previous iMac was. Maybe the level of the ‘consumerism’ approach has reached you now like it did me about 5 years ago.
 
Not a single thing you're saying is revelatory. Nor am I a time traveler. Forgive me for not explicitly stating that I'm posting from the year 2021.

The new iMacs look feminine to me. What else can I tell you? Attempting to explain *why* they appear feminine is a distraction at best.
Yes, and that is your opinion. But as others have said your opinion has been created through marketing and manipulation.

FWIW I am talking to my tailor tomorrow about getting some pink pants made. And I am a straight guy, but no doubt will get looks from the ‘real men’ who aren’t capable of thinking beyond denim and a tee shirt.

In regards to the colours, I have no issue with any of them, and am a little dissapointed in the yellow and orange not being more vibrant. Would have totally gone for a 70’s orange or egg yoke yellow iMac.
 
This. @eicca needs to take a breath and think more deeply about what he/she is saying
That unique preferences of males and females are based in basic science and fundamental biology? Not that complex.

Females are more sensitive to color. Males are more sensitive to motion. Common science, easily substantiated. Thus, the respective stereotypes for color or action preference are based in our very building blocks.
 
  • Like
Reactions: qoop
Remember the Apple color Powerbooks AKA The Barbie laptops well there are back as iMac except the colors are even more washed out. Now even Barbie doesn't want to be seen with one. Hey you can give to your old smelly church lady aunt it matches all her sunday best. You remember her I bet your cheeks are still apple red from her squeezing them. Run Forrest run!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Robospungo
When you said color preferences are due to biology. If so, how did they change so drastically in the 1940s? That is an example of color preference changing rather drastically.
You need to read my post again, more carefully. I clearly said that females generally prefer colors because they have more color receptors in their eyes, which is why we associate colorful things as being feminine. Males, biologically configured along the lines of hunter-gatherers, have more receptors for motion and shapes, which is why they generally prefer action-packed or "tough-looking" geometries.

I never once said that a preference toward blue or pink was associated with male or female.
 
You've quoted me doing nothing of the sort.

The bedroom is clearly feminine. We know it's feminine. You know it's feminine. We know that you know it's feminine. Yet you continue to hold the line, despite how transparent it is. Fascinating from a psychological perspective.
You are clearly stating that everybody supposedly agrees with you but is lying about it. Come on. You are flatly wrong about this.

Most people don’t find the colors feminine. You do. Fine. But statements like the above, accusing everybody that disagrees with you on the thread of lying (because you think they secretly agree with you) is just plain wrong.
 
You are clearly stating that everybody supposedly agrees with you but is lying about it. Come on. You are flatly wrong about this.

Most people don’t find the colors feminine. You do. Fine. But statements like the above, accusing everybody that disagrees with you on the thread of lying (because you think they secretly agree with you) is just plain wrong.
I'm not playing along with the charade. Most people don't find the unicorn bedroom feminine? Where do you come up with that utter nonsense? Statement like that are a complete waste of everyone's time.

Like I said, feel free to be as disingenuous as you'd like. I'm done interacting with you.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.