Stop misinterpreting what I'm saying. Geez.
Right, what I'm saying is,
if there is a fault within the first 6 months in the UK, the retailer has to offer to repair, replace or refund unless they can prove that the fault was not present at the time of purchase.
That means that they couldn't use any inspection to deny a repair. THAT's what I'm saying.
I really do not get what is so hard to understand about that? There's only one person here who's arguing for no reason. Especially as I believe you are not from the UK, yet are arguing that you know more about UK law than someone from the UK.
http://www.tradingstandards.gov.uk/cgi-bin/brent&harrow/con1item.cgi?file=*adv0043-1011.txt
Read the section "Proving the fault". It's pretty clear. Edit: In fact, I'll paste it here for you:
"If you have accepted the goods and are seeking repair or replacement within the first six months after purchase, it is for THE TRADER to prove that the goods conformed to the contract (were not faulty) at the time they were sold to you. If you are claiming repair or replacement more than six months after purchase, the burden of proof is back to YOU, the consumer."