Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Just noticed that The Digital Picture has published a comparison of the 70-200mm f/4L IS versus the 70-300 f/4-5.6L IS.

It paints a different picture than that blog review posted above. Their tests put the 70-200 f/4L IS ahead in resolution at just about every focal length and aperture combination:

http://the-digital-picture.com/Revi...mp=738&CameraComp=453&SampleComp=0&Camera=453

Interesting difference. Possibly due to differences in individual lenses. That is something I always worry about. Unless a lens is really bad how do you manage that?

In one of the comments I recall reading that the 70-200mm lens did not perform as well at shorter distances. Perhaps a difference in these two tests was the distance to the object imaged?

It will be interesting to see what sort of charts slrgear.com produces when they do their detailed test.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.