Just noticed that The Digital Picture has published a comparison of the 70-200mm f/4L IS versus the 70-300 f/4-5.6L IS.
It paints a different picture than that blog review posted above. Their tests put the 70-200 f/4L IS ahead in resolution at just about every focal length and aperture combination:
http://the-digital-picture.com/Revi...mp=738&CameraComp=453&SampleComp=0&Camera=453
Interesting difference. Possibly due to differences in individual lenses. That is something I always worry about. Unless a lens is really bad how do you manage that?
In one of the comments I recall reading that the 70-200mm lens did not perform as well at shorter distances. Perhaps a difference in these two tests was the distance to the object imaged?
It will be interesting to see what sort of charts slrgear.com produces when they do their detailed test.