the only good thing for me is that my FAN is applied to the older plan, I never used hotspot so is there any reason to move to the new unlimited plus ? What is everyone else doing ? Will I still get high speed lte on the grandfathered plan ?
the only good thing for me is that my FAN is applied to the older plan, I never used hotspot so is there any reason to move to the new unlimited plus ? What is everyone else doing ? Will I still get high speed lte on the grandfathered plan ?
I have been on the grandfathered plan since the beginning as well (3 lines). I also said AT&T would have to pry it away from me in order to get me off of it, but I switch. We were paying $185 for 550 minutes, unlimited text and 3 UDP plans with a 21% FAN. That was going up to $200 because of the data line increase. My bill is now $194 but will be dropping down to $184 once auto-pay kicks in. So I am getting tethering (much wanted), unlimited talk + unlimited Mexico & Canada all for $1 dollar less a month, even without FAN.
I dropped my old grandfather UDP to the (now retired) DTV UDP. I haven't switched to the new "plus" plan because my FAN discount of 25% will not apply and I'll end up paying roughly $20 more if I go to the plus plan.
But we lost the subsidies with 2 year agreements. $450 worth of devices per line times 3 for you
I know it appeared that you only had to pay $199 for a $650 phone... but you were paying the other $450 one way or another.
It was built into your monthly payment.
The carriers weren't giving you a gift.
I never understood why the word "subsidy" was used to describe this practice anyway. Seems like a misnomer.
Call it what it is: $199 down payment... with the remainder tucked in your bill every month.
Sure... they got rid of "subsidies" but they replaced them with payment plans. And it actually makes more sense now because you actually know what it costs for service and how much it costs for the phone itself.
The real crime was letting people believe the iPhone only cost $199. That should have never happened.
I know it appeared that you only had to pay $199 for a $650 phone... but you were paying the other $450 one way or another.
It was built into your monthly payment.
The carriers weren't giving you a gift.
I never understood why the word "subsidy" was used to describe this practice anyway. Seems like a misnomer.
Call it what it is: $199 down payment... with the remainder tucked in your bill every month.
Sure... they got rid of "subsidies" but they replaced them with payment plans. And it actually makes more sense now because you actually know what it costs for service and how much it costs for the phone itself.
The real crime was letting people believe the iPhone only cost $199. That should have never happened.
It only came out to be a good deal because the carriers charged the same for service whether or not you got subsidized equipment and were on the contract. So those who got the cheaper phones were just paying them off via the payments that were accounted for the subsidy in the price of their service, but those who kept their devices after their contract was up or brought their own devices were actually essentially being overcharged by also still paying for that subsidy that they basically weren't using at all.I know it appeared that you only had to pay $199 for a $650 phone... but you were paying the other $450 one way or another.
It was built into your monthly payment.
The carriers weren't giving you a gift.
I never understood why the word "subsidy" was used to describe this practice anyway. Seems like a misnomer.
Call it what it is: $199 down payment... with the remainder tucked in your bill every month.
Sure... they got rid of "subsidies" but they replaced them with payment plans. And it actually makes more sense now because you actually know what it costs for service and how much it costs for the phone itself.
The real crime was letting people believe the iPhone only cost $199. That should have never happened.
I'm sorry, but you're wrong.
The carriers were giving us a gift, it was not buried in the bill. Similar to what they are doing now, the carriers were fighting for market share and deeply discounting the iPhone as a result. They figured that the cost of acquiring a customer to drive up their stock prices was worth the $400 hit. And they were right. An industry was born.
The shell game you refer to- small monthly payments or leasing- that came about last year when the carriers colluded and shut off the subsidy spigot. "Pay $650 cash or $29 a month!" that's brand new baloney, didn't happen back in 2006 through 2015.
BJ
The carriers were giving us a gift, it was not buried in the bill.
The shell game you refer to- small monthly payments or leasing- that came about last year when the carriers colluded and shut off the subsidy spigot. "Pay $650 cash or $29 a month!" that's brand new baloney, didn't happen back in 2006 through 2015.
Yeah, except the monthly rate did *not* go down if you chose not to take advantage of an upgrade offer. So if you stayed off contract, you were basically forfeiting $450 every 2 years per line. Or sometimes as much as $450 every year if your plan cost >$100/month (which was usually the "main" line on a family plan). If you did not anticipate changing carriers, there was no reason not to take advantage of those offers.I clearly remember, even back in the old flip-phone days, that phones were "cheap" or "free" to get you to sign the contract. Were those gifts too?
The whole point of the contract was to keep you paying for two years... since the actual cost of the device was inside your monthly bill.
The "free" flip-phones and $199 iPhones were a myth.
Right, it wasn't so much as a gift for staying on, it was almost more of a penalty for not taking advantage of it since you'd be paying for it whether or not you took advantage of the subsidy.Yeah, except the monthly rate did *not* go down if you chose not to take advantage of an upgrade offer. So if you stayed off contract, you were basically forfeiting $450 every 2 years per line. Or sometimes as much as $450 every year if your plan cost >$100/month (which was usually the "main" line on a family plan). If you did not anticipate changing carriers, there was no reason not to take advantage of those offers.
If You use tethering then it may be worth it otherwise new plans show no value and FAN discount is not even applicable. Att giving ice in the winter once again. When we see how many customers they lost this quarter maybe they'll get the message
No discount once phone is paid off but new plans ( unlimited or unlimited plus)
Cost more. If You use tethering then it may be worth it otherwise new plans show no value and FAN discount is not even applicable Att giving ice in the winter once again. When we see how many customers they lost this quarter maybe they'll get the message
I'm still sticking with the original unlimited plan on my iPhone 5. No value add in downgrading to the newer plans.
the only good thing for me is that my FAN is applied to the older plan, I never used hotspot so is there any reason to move to the new unlimited plus ? What is everyone else doing ? Will I still get high speed lte on the grandfathered plan ?