Apple doesn't have dominant control over any market. They control 6% of the handset market, and that is all. If 10% of the total handset market uses IOS, Apple video, Ibooks, etc, it doesn't come close to constituting a Monopoly. Furthermore, Apple doesn't direct traffic to Apple =)
Also, Apple uses legitimate advertising to win customers. Unlike Samsung, Apple doesn't win customers based primarily on advertising. Samsung uses Googles operating system. Google has a huge conflict in supporting its own profit, and pushing its own services. Since Google controls the majority of the flow of information through searches and is prioritizing its own services, it effectively has created a monopoly. Doesn't mean advertising is wrong. The problem comes from them owning the mechanism that lets people find services, prioritizing its own services to direct traffic to their services, and controlling the mechanism for sales from those purchases. Seems the FTC agrees with my logic. This hurts consumers, and is very anti-competitive.
http://wallstreetpit.com/97572-searching-for-a-real-antitrust-problem/
IOS is a better product. It doesn't require tactics like this to win customers. People buy IPhones as a conscious effort. Buying an Android phone is equal to saying "I don't care about these things, and will buy whatever the store tells me to". It's also equal to saying "I don't care if open means less secure". In short, Android device users, are low energy, low motivation, low engagement customers. Should come as no surprise that Apple is controlling 90% of web traffic on Tablets. Android tablet owners likely rarely use for anything data intensive. Not saying this is true for everyone, although I'd wager it is for the majority.
