How did cnet and the Verge not notice this? cnet gave mini editors choice rating and the Verge rated it the same as the Air - 9.3/10.
When the iPad 2 and the first mini were released did people complain about color gamut and washed out screens? I have family and friends who own the first mini and never once have they complained about the screen being washed out.
Perhaps because they aren't as susceptible to wild hyperbole as that gent from reviewed.com was.....
Good grief. I don't see any aliens when I look at photos on my iPad mini. Sure its a litte understaurated and washed out - but as I've been saying in numerous other threads, Apple either gives the mini the iPad 3 treamtent, giving us the perfect display but making the device thicker, heavier and run hotter with less battery life.
OR
They keep what makes the mini so great, and step the display up over two years. This year they give us the sharp retina goodness. Next year they fix the color reproduction.
At some point, its just not possible to make the perfect device. These rMini displays are FIRST generations.....they could never be PERFECT. Apple decided to compromise in ONE area this time rather than several like the iPad 3 and I, for one, am glad they did it this way....
Especially since I don't constantly compare my rMini side by side with anything. When simply looking at the display independent of anything else, it looks just fine. Hell even when I DO compare, "ALIEN" and "ABSURD" are WAY over the top in comparing the difference. Washed-out is all that's needed.
EDIT: FYI - compared with the first gen mini, the rMini is better across the board in saturation, white balance and obviously sharpness. Seems the color gamut stayed roughly the same.