Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I have both PS and LR open, Adobe Apps are killing RAM

1732286791803.png
 
I had a base model M4 Mac Mini. Great the 1st day.
Overheating on the 2nd day. Av temp around 70c.
I returned it. Very disappointed.
Honestly, 70 degrees Celsius is not overheating if you’re using it. The chip temperature can surpass the 100ºC. In fact, for the M2 chip on the MBA, it was quite common to reach 108ºC under load.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ruftzooi
Honestly, 70 degrees Celsius is not overheating if you’re using it. The chip temperature can surpass the 100ºC. In fact, for the M2 chip on the MBA, it was quite common to reach 108ºC under load.
According to Apple's tech support, the Mac Mini should not be at that temp at idle. It never dropped below 70c. Which caused it to throttle. What's the point of having an M4 if the throttling causes it to run like an Intel chip? The day it arrived the system temp was around 40c and there was no throttling. I took the advice of tech support and returned it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Populus
According to Apple's tech support, the Mac Mini should not be at that temp at idle. It never dropped below 70c. Which caused it to throttle. What's the point of having an M4 if the throttling causes it to run like an Intel chip? The day it arrived the system temp was around 40c and there was no throttling. I took the advice of tech support and returned it.
Either you got a faulty device, or something you installed was cooking it.

Mine gets hot, but TBH only when I benchmark it!
 
Either you got a faulty device, or something you installed was cooking it.

Mine gets hot, but TBH only when I benchmark it!
Activity monitor showed nothing unusual. After exhausting all possibilities, both he and his superior came to the conclusion that the Mac was faulty. At this stage it appears I simply got a dud. It happens.
 
Activity monitor showed nothing unusual. After exhausting all possibilities, both he and his superior came to the conclusion that the Mac was faulty. At this stage it appears I simply got a dud. It happens.
So did you order another?
 
I’ve seen mentioned a few times around these forums that Macs will use RAM just because it’s available, not necessarily because it’s needed, so the yellow pressure doesn’t always indicate a lack of RAM. No idea if that’s true, but of course the real evidence of RAM shortage is when it actually affects usage.

That is true. For everyday computing, there's very little need to get anything more than whatever RAM is in the base model. You memory pressure will be yellow, but it won't have any real world impact on the vast majority of people. My 16GB M1 Pro has been yellow for almost the entire 3 years I've had it and with the exception of when I'm trying to run something severely resource heavy like a 2nd instance of MacOS inside a Parallels VM, it just works.
 
  • Like
Reactions: eltoslightfoot
I've had my base model M4 Mini for over a week and I have yet to use any swap memory in my day to day usage which includes running, my day trading software, Discord app, streaming live TV and watching YouTube videos in between live TV shows. All this with only 16gb of memory and 256GBs of storage. Although I have ordered an OWC Thunderbolt 4 enclosure to be used with a 2TB NVMe SSD. I plan on booting and running my OS from my external storage which should be a piece of cake.
 
I would keep my base model for long-term use. I worried about the RAM and SSD (256G) but convinced myself I could live with that.

1) The RAM pressure has no noticeable impact to use
2) I hooked an external 1-TB SSD, and moved most of APP data (LR, Capture one, Chrome, FCP, PS) to the external SSD, so I believe I don't need to worry about the 256G internal SSD.

I am satisfied with the performance of the base model so far.
 
Just finished migrating my M4 Mini with 512gb to my base M4 Mini Pro.

Happy with the change. I have everything i want open and no memory pressure.

helps that i got it for 200 off at microcenter, else i probab wouldn’t have done it.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Miles Fu
Actually returning the M4 Pro even though it’s significantly faster for my workflows I cannot justify the extra $1300 for the base M4 Pro…
 
  • Like
Reactions: eltoslightfoot
Actually returning the M4 Pro even though it’s significantly faster for my workflows I cannot justify the extra $1300 for the base M4 Pro…
So you’re going back to the M4 mini? Was it fast enough? What configuration are you going with? 512/24?
 
So you’re going back to the M4 mini? Was it fast enough? What configuration are you going with? 512/24?
The M4 is blazing fast enough. The only thing I will miss is the M4 Pro exports video at about 33% - 50% faster but that is not worth an additional $1200 right now.

I am sticking with the 16 GB, 256 Gb and using a 1M2 OWC with 4 terabytes externally.
 
Exactly ... it was the ”Unless you're only doing e-mail and word processing, there is little point considering the vanilla M4.” comment.

I just loaded up Logic 11 and played the Beck/Colours demo while doing a shedload of other stuff on my M4 mini and it didn't skip a beat.

Yes, the Pro is clearly better, but lets not pretend the non-pro is a typewriter.
Plus there have been some complaints of fan noise with the M4 Pro Mac Mini…so, if you don’t actually need it? There are some advantages to the base model.
 
I tried to push the base Mini; the RAM pressure is as follows. It can still work well and switch from apps.

I thought 16GB RAM should be enough for me, I'd not struggle if I need to change to the 24GB version.


02.png
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.