Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

FilmIndustryGuy

macrumors 6502a
Original poster
May 12, 2015
612
393
Manhattan Beach, CA
I started off with the i3 and it works well for Lightroom and FCPX but once I started piling of audio tracks in a 4k project adn i did notice some stutters. I also noticed adjustments in Lightroom fully using CPU but not the 630. WHen I plugged in the Blackmagic eGPU all of a sudden sliding adjustments used the eGPU 100% so this left me confused. Due to seing how effective these programs are using CPU im thinking of changing my stance on media use and going with i7.

Anyone see a huge performance jumb upgrading? its not a must but im questioning workflow in the near future when using something like Red code footage
 
Anyone see a huge performance jumb upgrading? its not a must but im questioning workflow in the near future when using something like Red code footage

Adobe has support pages that specifically address how its applications use a GPU.

If “Red code footage” is a typo for Red camera footage, it seems to me that using an i7 is the obvious thing to do.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ixxx69
I started off with the i3 and it works well for Lightroom and FCPX but once I started piling of audio tracks in a 4k project adn i did notice some stutters. I also noticed adjustments in Lightroom fully using CPU but not the 630. WHen I plugged in the Blackmagic eGPU all of a sudden sliding adjustments used the eGPU 100% so this left me confused. Due to seing how effective these programs are using CPU im thinking of changing my stance on media use and going with i7.

Anyone see a huge performance jumb upgrading? its not a must but im questioning workflow in the near future when using something like Red code footage
Agree with @F-Train, and especially if you're doing a lot of FCPX and/or 4K footage, the i7 is absolutely recommended.

(btw, not saying i7 will "fix" whatever stutters you've seen - that could be related to any number of things including the CPU, RAM, GPU, or occasional system hiccups... but i7 should benefit your usage).
 
I suppose an i3 could work if you used proxies throughout, but it sure doesn’t sound ideal. I’d want at least the i5, which I have owned and which will work for most 4K purposes, although I haven’t tried it with multi-camera editing.

When you export, and if you are using Compressor, the new 64-bit version is wickedly fast, but performance/speed is very much tied to processor power.

If I was editing RAW 4K footage, I wouldn’t think twice about getting the i7.
 
I’d want at least the i5, which I have owned and which will work for most 4K purposes, although I haven’t tried it with multi-camera editing.

Did you find the i7 noisier than the i5 during constant medium/high load (Resolve with 4K HEVC and RED R3Ds)?
 
Did you find the i7 noisier than the i5 during constant medium/high load (Resolve with 4K HEVC and RED R3Ds)?

I don’t keep my ear 2” from the computer and I certainly didn’t try to do some kind of comparitive noise test between two computers owned at different times.

I don’t spend time trying to listen to the external video card either :)
 
Last edited:
I don’t keep my ear 2” from the computer and I certainly didn’t try to do some kind of comparitive noise test between two computers owned at different times.

I don’t spend time trying to listen to the external video card either :)

mmm...ok...thanks anyway ;-)
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.