Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Not when it come to maintaining updates and keep everything working smoothly on all the different flavors for android. Its not like you just convert and release on Google play and your done.

Plain and simple there is just a better ROI with the Apple Store.

Its still a 7 billion market even if it would require more work.
 
It's amazing this is still the case. Considering Google over took them on number of apps and downloads, Apple keeping their lead in revenue despite their being (relatively) such few iOS devices is impressive.

LOL. did you even stop for a moment and think that, it might be because most of the iPaid apps are free or cheaper in Google Play. Never mind, iSheep baaa..

why am i in macrumors ? i like both the worlds and each have their pros and cons.
 
To a developer...this is old news. Makes converting apps to work with Android not worth the time and effort.

I'm hoping more people switch to iOS so we don't have to worry as much about making stuff for Android.

----------

LOL. did you even stop for a moment and think that, it might be because most of the iPaid apps are free or cheaper in Google Play. Never mind, iSheep baaa..

why am i in macrumors ? i like both the worlds and each have their pros and cons.

Well yeah, that's exactly why. The developers don't seem to think people on Android are willing to pay as much. That makes it a worse market for developers (and better for consumers in a way). It's impressive that the iOS market is that much different. I don't know why you're calling him an "iSheep" for pointing it out.
 
LOL. did you even stop for a moment and think that, it might be because most of the iPaid apps are free or cheaper in Google Play. Never mind, iSheep baaa..

why am i in macrumors ? i like both the worlds and each have their pros and cons.

Or it could be that iPhone customers tend to earn more money and spend more money, making developing on that platform more profitable for developers.

You might not think this matters, but it means iPhone and iPad gets higher quality apps, because developers can afford more resources to make them.

You're hardly balanced if you're using terms like "iSheep". Go away.
 
Last edited:
It really depends on how the revenue is measured. Android apps are more commonly free since they are easier to pirate. Making them free and ad supported means that there isn't any reason to pirate and the developers can get some revenue from the ads.
 
I'm gonna tell all of mine too.


Wait a second I don't have any friends.. Well I did, but then I started talking about marketshare, profit margins and taptic feedback and then they all just stopped calling.. Strange.. Where are they..?

Anyway, one of them had a really cute nickname. We called him Applescruff because when he ate fruit he'd get it all over his facHEY WAIT A MINUTE IS THAT YOU??! YOU BETRAYED ME! YOU BETRAYED MMMEEEHHHHHHH!!!!!!

;)

It wasn't me. I didn't get fruit on my face. :D.
 
I continue to be amazed how the Apple model churns out so much money compared to the Google model. I know the explanation that fragmentation of the OS and all the competing hardware that make them commodities and all that. Still, we really need to stop and question why no one else is following the Apple model given no one else is making anything close.
 
Tell my friends? Hell I'm selling my phone to get an iPhone so I can contribute to the profits. Bragging rights son. ;)


I'm going to the Apple store right now and giving them all of my money. And I'm not going to buy anything. I'm just gonna give them my money. :p
 
Its still a 7 billion market even if it would require more work.

The question is then whether the extra work is worth entering that market, and that might not be the case for some developers. It is less likely to be worth it for small developers.
 
It's amazing this is still the case. Considering Google over took them on number of apps and downloads, Apple keeping their lead in revenue despite their being (relatively) such few iOS devices is impressive.

My guess is that 2 things weigh in here:
1) There's multiple Google stores and IMO you'd get a high percentage of people using the dodgy ones where you can download cloned/pirated apps. Even the official store has less regulation and you see that kinda stuff goong on. Apple's bans often seem weird but they encourage people to make apps that are worth selling.
2) 2 Different sets of customers. How do I say... Apple customers are probably more likely to accept that some things cost money.
 
In other words, Android users get more things for free while Apple users have to pay more often. When you keep your customers in a walled barrel the shooting is easy...

----------



Right. That's why Android users had 70% more app downloads that Apple users.

You make it sound like the average Android user experience is much different than the Apple's "walled barrel" approach. It isn't. In fact, due to malware and the generally crappier apps, the experience is worse. There's a reason why Google recently copied Apple's approach to app curation.

70% more app downloads and yet devs make a lot less money. Doesn't sound like a very good business model.
 
In other words, Android users get more things for free while Apple users have to pay more often. When you keep your customers in a walled barrel the shooting is easy...

----------



Right. That's why Android users had 70% more app downloads that Apple users.

Where did you come up with these conclusions? Android has a much high market share, so they will win the downloads game by sheer volume of users. The revenue difference highlights make up of iOS vs Andriod devices and ultimately their user base. The majority of Andriod users are on sub-$200 handsets. Someone on a cheap $50-$100 Andriod smartphone from Alcatel isn't going spend $5-$10 on an advanced featured productivity app, nor are they likely to buy apps in general. They WILL download plenty of free apps, however. Nothing wrong with the people on those devices, I'm just telling it like it is.

Let's stop pretending that every Andriod user is using a Galaxy S6, Galaxy Note 4, HTC One, LG G3, or a Moto X.
 
I think the biggest reason for the disparity is competition. The App Store has none. GP Store has competition from multiple sources.

It's funny how some in this forum like to say iPhone users have & are willing to spend more money but will complain like tightwads about spending more than $0.99 on an app.

Either way. Neither company is hurting.
 
That might be because most popular apps on Android are actually free :p. Just saying, I know because I have to usually download apps from the ipad for my nephew and I noticed that quite a fair bit of apps are actually free on Android, and cost money on iOS..

Anyway I'm sure there are many other factors, but I suspect that certainly has a bit to do with it..

Plus I downloaded many free songs and Albums from Google Play store as well, occasionally they are given for free. I bought ColdPlay's latst album completely free for a limited time of course :p

Is revenue low because the apps are free, or are the apps free because revenue is low? That's the question. Tbh in my experience (which may not be universal, of course) it seems that Android users are far less able and/or willing to pay for apps, which will impact whether or not developers decide to charge or not.
 
You might want to re-learn facts. Reported September 2014 Android had 52% of users; Apple had around 40+%. That's hardly a "LOT more users" and certainly not enough to account for the difference in downloads.



The article you linked is numbers for the United States.

The difference in iOS and Android is larger worldwide, so you cannot compare the too.

Also, why do you sound bitter about this article?
 
Last edited:
I'm going to the Apple store right now and giving them all of my money. And I'm not going to buy anything. I'm just gonna give them my money. :p
Let's face it you already are remember, Android sells way more apps, yet Apple makes way more money, which means you're donating to Apples coffers.
Damn, that means I am too, but hey, I'm not happy about it. Well at least I'm donating to both, I have a crappy HTC M8, I hate that it never has any crashes on it like I do on my iPad Air.
 
Tell my friends? Hell I'm selling my phone to get an iPhone so I can contribute to the profits. Bragging rights son. ;)

Bragging rights to what? Every monkey and their uncle has an Apple-something-or-another. No one cares you have an new iPhone. It used to be a status symbol, now it's just a sign of an expensive gadget.

If I had a way to connect something other than iPhone to my car audio system (no BT), I would ditch mine, but right now, that is most important to me so I live with all the bugs I have endure every day.
 
Bragging rights to what? Every monkey and their uncle has an Apple-something-or-another. No one cares you have an new iPhone. It used to be a status symbol, now it's just a sign of an expensive gadget.

If I had a way to connect something other than iPhone to my car audio system (no BT), I would ditch mine, but right now, that is most important to me so I live with all the bugs I have endure every day.

Was just joking with Scruff dude. IBS?

----------

I'm going to the Apple store right now and giving them all of my money. And I'm not going to buy anything. I'm just gonna give them my money. :p

All your money? Pssh, rookie. I'm giving all my money , taking my neighbors money AND selling my grandmother's Hummel figurines. Profit4life.
 
Yeah google has a what? 7 billion $ market? "If it aint got double digit in billions it aint worth it" , am I right or what?

Look At The graph. With Google, Developers compete with more people for less money.
 
Where did you come up with these conclusions? Android has a much high market share, so they will win the downloads game by sheer volume of users. The revenue difference highlights make up of iOS vs Andriod devices and ultimately their user base. The majority of Andriod users are on sub-$200 handsets. Someone on a cheap $50-$100 Andriod smartphone from Alcatel isn't going spend $5-$10 on an advanced featured productivity app, nor are they likely to buy apps in general. They WILL download plenty of free apps, however. Nothing wrong with the people on those devices, I'm just telling it like it is.

Let's stop pretending that every Android user is using a Galaxy S6, Galaxy Note 4, HTC One, LG G3, or a Moto X.

You're exactly right... if you buy a cheap phone you're probably not spending a lot of money on apps.

Those popular flagship phones you mentioned make up a tiny percentage of Android phones.

"Android" is actually made up of over 60 manufacturers... most of whom we never talk about on tech forums.

"Android" is also installed on over a billion phones sold every year. So yeah... the sheer volume of users certainly leads to a high number of downloads.

But money made from those downloads isn't that high at all.

Overall... "Android" users simply don't spend money on apps. There could be 5 times as many Android phones on Earth... yet Apple phones earn more app revenue with fewer phones.
 
What's new? We all know android users have less income(on average) than the iOS users.

Or the fact that many apps on android are free. Having had both android and iOS. There are apps that were free on android that I had to pay for on iOS. Since I got my iPhone 6+ I find myself spending more money on apps then I normally would have spent when I had my gs4 and note 4.

I get so tired of the elitist attitude that android is for poor people.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.