Hi, apologies for the quick post but would appreciate some quick advice between these two secondhand monitors. Assume they're roughly the same price. Both are roughly 2 years old (so the ACD will be the post-2006 "silent update" with the higher contrast and hopefully no pink cast) and minimal use, excellent condition. I'll be using this mainly for Lightroom, Photoshop, InDesign & Illustrator and some FCE work; I'll be home printing and using lab prints for the photo work and litho and digital printing for the ID & Illustrator work. Plus the usual web & office stuff. The 23in ACD specs you probably know. I have a strong personal preference for a matte screen, hence I'm not looking at the new ACDs. The Eizo was from their second-tier "Flexscan" range rather than the top-tier "Colour Edge". It has a 24in 1920x1200 screen, 14 bit internal processing, hardware calibration, 450cd brightness (not that I'll be using it that bright for editing), 1000:1 contrast, using a PVA panel (as do a lot of the mid-range Eizos). Brochure link here. I've looked at a few new monitors and the Dell u2410 and others from NEC and HP look nice, but I'm wary of the pink/green tint issue on the Dell and I'm not convinced a wide gamut monitor is the right choice just now. Would really appreciate any first hand views, especially on the Eizo, and all advice welcome. Many thanks.