Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

gadgetfreaky

macrumors 65816
Original poster
Oct 28, 2007
1,373
507
Check out the talk time, and audio playback etc....battery life is actually worse.

I was expecting an improvement in battery life since it's the single most valuable feature rated by users. Who cares if I can play Flappy Bird at 1000 FPS if my battery is dead?
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2016-09-07 at 1.10.01 PM.png
    Screen Shot 2016-09-07 at 1.10.01 PM.png
    145 KB · Views: 183

M5RahuL

macrumors 68040
Aug 1, 2009
3,410
2,030
TeXaS
Check out the talk time, and audio playback etc....battery life is actually worse.

I was expecting an improvement in battery life since it's the single most valuable feature rated by users. Who cares if I can play Flappy Bird at 1000 FPS if my battery is dead?

Well, wireless will obviously eat more battery.
 

techiebug

macrumors 6502a
Oct 20, 2013
730
259
It's actually better. Except the ones with "wireless", everything else is better. If you use regular wired headphones, the battery will last just as long if not longer
 

AdamA9

macrumors 65816
Feb 2, 2010
1,232
355
I did notice the battery life was skipped over very quickly in the keynote and completely left out of the Watch 2.

You'd have thought with all the billions Apple holds in cash they'd have come up with a decent battery solution by now.
 

EM2013

macrumors 68020
Sep 2, 2013
2,480
2,309
I don't think it'll be worse but I don't think it'll be better either.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.