Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
This is way cool because I see where Apple is going by acquiring all these different technologies and companies. That way in the end the products they produce they all will produce in-house minimizing supply channel hiccups and maximizing profits. Go APPLE!
 
That's really cool. I've been following Liquid Metal since it was announced over a decade ago. I always thought it was strange that so few companies seemed interested in this innovative product. The material is so unique and accurate they claim you could create a razor blade via injection molding. Pretty impressive.

Interesting ball bounce demonstration:
http://www.liquidmetal.com/media/ball_bounce_DSL.mov

So now when you drop your MacBook Pro it will bounce right back at you! Love it!
 
There was a Titanium PowerBook some time ago. But when machined, that material would probably attract a premium. Aluminium is cheaper and easier to work I would think.

I had a PowerBook Titanium G4/667 for 3-1/2 years (and acquitted itself VERY well the entire time power-wise), before the hinge broke/snapped like so many others' had. That was after the pitting/discoloring/black specks appeared all over from the natural oils in my skin, and the paint bubbled/flaked off everywhere. It was a great laptop, though! I was amazed I could smoothly play Quake 3 maxed out and on battery the entire train ride downtown, LOL! Ran hot as hell (another bad thing about titanium). It also flexed way more than you'd expect titanium to flex...

I say "meh" to titanium -- it's SOOOOOO 20th century. :D ;)
 
How was it stupid? Aluminum is a lightweight metal and yet strong. It is also highly recyclable.

And from Apple's perspective, it being metal and acting as an external heatsink is a bonus for them to get things as thin as possible. :p

Aluminum is cheap not strong. Alloy and carbon fiber are light and strong.
 
Typical fanboy speaking.:) You do know that macbook is made of 'cheap China plastic' right ? and 100% of all products that Apple designs are made in China ?
and that's not the reason why Apple products are so expensive; is because Apple slaps a 200% or more profit margin on each product, and make it look like it's made out of 'magic' and they're somehow better than all other manufacturers.

I still to this date can't understand what's so 'premium' about Apple products. They use the same if not worse components and materials, but yet they cost much more.

They cost more because people buy them anyway.
 
Website said:
Permits thinner walls while providing greater strength.

Methinks all this means is they're going to use this technology to make super-thin casings, and shave 2-3mm off all of their products. .8" MacBook Pro, anyone?
 
What I would be interested in is the relative strength measurements of this material vs. aluminum. It could be more rigid per unit thickness, meaning it would be preferable over aluminum where form factor is crucial such as in iDevices.

http://www.liquidmetal.com/technology/

They have a plot of typical yield strength if you scroll down. Interestingly, they tout good strength to weight ratio, which I would think would be the more applicable plot, but they only show yield strength. I'm guessing that is because the Zr and Ti alloys they have gotten to yield strengths over 250 ksi are mostly (~50% or more) Zr, which would largely negate the strength to weight ratio advantage.

I would also hazard a guess that these are extremely brittle and have low crack propogation resistance. While high strength means you won't be able to bend it to failure, it will rely heavily on good manufacturing quality control.

You'll notice that you can't find any information out there that wasn't put out by LiquidMetals itself. It's been my experience that the amorphous metals craze since the 1980s has been probably 15% metallurgical innovation and 85% PR spin. Not saying they don't potentially have a quality product, but it's hard to figure out what the true advantages (and disadvantages are) given the limited info available ;)
 
This is quite interesting. Maybe Apple was attracted by the idea of casting small, precise shapes which won't require additional treatments? They say you can cast a razor edge. I wonder if they can cast tapped holes ready to accept screws?

If you are curious about amorphous metals most of us already have some in our possession. Those little security strips attached to DVDs and other stuff you buy at stores contain two pieces of metglas (different company from liquidmetal).
 
So, Apple finally admits that using aluminum was a stupid idea. Other companies were using alloys for laptop cases for decades, now Apple decided to join them. Better late than never, I guess.

Actually (fanboy time) it's not just an alloy, it's a totally different structure - albeit one that swordsmiths have been using for centuries...

Anyway, http://www.liquidmetal.com/ is flash-based so Steve probably has no idea what he's bought.
 
You look at the wrong places. Look at Sony Vaio Z (carbon fiber), HP EliteBook or Envy (precision-etched metal alloy case), Dell Studio XPS (magnesium alloy).

They are fine looking laptops, but the I think the majority of laptops are plastic. The lower-end ones anyway.
 
Aluminium is great for some things and useless for others.

Unfortunately, when cut into a thin shell (like a thick egg shell) for the external use of an item, one knock and it's dented.

Pretty useless for anything that get's knocked or bumped about. Plastics can be much stronger in this use.

Unfortunately we STILL have this "Plastic = Cheap" attitude rather than what's the best product for the job.

They could make 24 carat gold cases but they'd be useless.

And we shall continue to have this "Plastic = Cheap" attitude because, quite literally, it's true. Plastics are not stronger than metals, they are, however, more resilient. As you said, when certain metals, like aluminum, take a hit, you get a dent--plastics just deform and spring back. This isn't a demonstration of strength, but rather of flexibility, since an impact that would shatter the plastic would merely show a bigger dent in the metal.

The logical outcome of this, then, would be for an all-metal housing with the flexibility of a plastic, but the durability of metal. However, this hardly seems to be the only reason to choose Liquidmetal's technology. If it were, the concept of having exclusivity is somewhat weak since a stamped steel housing would have similar characteristics even if slightly heavier. The weight difference between 18gauge steel and 18gauge aluminum isn't really all that much when you're looking at about 1 square foot of the material. 8 ounces may be twice as much as 4 ounces, but that's still only a quarter pound difference overall.

No, there's probably another factor here we haven't considered yet and may not realize until Apple releases a new product with the metal. Maybe it is something like 'transparent aluminum'. Word is that one company has developed a prototype material (I don't remember who) that could meet those qualifications of weight and transparency, but then, would it work as a display for a capacitive touchscreen? What if it's something completely different, like developing a flip-back cover for the iPad screen that could also morph into a rigid stand for Landscape or Portrait display regardless of hinge point and not 'transparent aluminum' at all?

There could be many possibilities here. We can guess and deduce all we want, but until a product comes out from Apple, we really won't have any ideas.
 
Aluminum is cheap not strong. Alloy and carbon fiber are light and strong.

If aluminum wasn't strong, it wouldn't be used on aircraft with the aluminum shell having to take the stress of pressurization and depressurization( and Apple claims it is the same grade used on aircraft). Also, wouldn't be able to withstand Mach 1 and faster speeds.
 
t-1000_002.png
 
If aluminum wasn't strong, it wouldn't be used on aircraft with the aluminum shell having to take the stress of pressurization and depressurization( and Apple claims it is the same grade used on aircraft).

I HIGHLY doubt that, as much as an APPLE fanboy I am, the GIANT raw blocks of aluminum they get may be Aircraft grade, but after they cut the aluminum down to pretty much 2mm thin, and use a WAY less expensive finishing process it is lightyears away from aircraft Alu.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.