Is there an easy way to tell if your iPod touch has this problem?
You know, I was thinking about the quality issues Apple has been having as of late. Yellow screens, dead pixels, bleeding pixels, heat problems, negative black issues...
And I thought to myself... doesn't anyone look at any of these things before they make (or ship) a bazillion of them?
And then I saw the new ad for the Nano. "1, 2, 3, 4..." white Nano, red Nano, green Nano, gray Nano, blue Nano, black Nano, white Nano, red Nano, blue Nano, black Nano, white Nano, blue Nano, green... WAIT!
An UPSIDE DOWN green Nano!
How the hell does THAT that past QC?! They can't even quality control their TV ad!![]()
Ive been running OS X on my *gasp* AMD processor for about 6 months now... now that is the real monster here...
Arisian
If the screen issue is fixed then I may not be afraid to get one anymore. But is it still a bad idea to buy a 1.0 product? Should the iPod touch be treated as a 1.0 product?![]()
Techno: that's a horrible example. It is obvious from the picture that you are viewing the iPhone screen at an angle that distorts the colors on an LCD. I bet if you take a picture of the iPhone screen looking at it straight on, it would look fine.
Uhm, I'm the one who owns this phone. Thank you for your conjecture, but I think I know what I see every day when I play videos.
I'm return this one to BB this weekend anyway, I can always get a new one later. Not interested to exchange it at apple store, last time did exchange, the guy just run in and out of their storage, holding one without box, didn't even know if its a refurb unit.
Unless someone can tell me that I will be offerred a new box![]()
you are the only one to report it happening on the iPhone. But why not post a proper picture and remove all doubt?
Ouch dude. What model and when did you get it? I got my 4Gig last week and it's flawless. I assume the 4Gig are the left-overs from launch that no one wanted. Interesting how the one "no one wants" is the one that works just fine...
Then why did you post the picture of the phone at all? Obviously you felt you needed to post a photo to back up your claim at the time, so why do you now feel that "Uhm, I'm the one who owns this phone" is enough to support your claim?
I find this a bit over the top...........right, maybe compared to all of the touch units they every plan on selling, but from posters on this board it seemed greater than, say, 80% (although those with defective ipods are probably more likely to post)....
I was at an apple store this evening returning my 16gb. The "genius" (the way he handled an airport thingy before hand made me wonder) said apple has acknowledged it, like above. and that it was a contrast problem that they should be updating soon. I told him i wasn't very confident in that and would still like to return it. He said there would be a restocking fee and i told him that i feel like i should have to pay it. Then i talked to maybe the manager i dunno, who had no idea what the problem was but still got me a full refund which was nice. I was gonna get a nano as an exchange/surprise for someone but they came in while i was there. but anyways. seems like the problem should be fixed soon. So i had a little bit of grief but just persisted.
I get frustrated by Apple's poor customer service policies. What kind of clod tries to charge the customer a restocking fee for returning a defective product? Apple, pull your head out of your arse.
I get frustrated by Apple's poor customer service policies. What kind of clod tries to charge the customer a restocking fee for returning a defective product? Apple, pull your head out of your arse.