Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
now can they do the quiet upgrade fro the original display where they just update 60hz to 120hz?
 
Still costly but this price updation/correction is good. Both stands should not have been priced similarly.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mganu
I just got an email from Apple:

Thank you for your recent online purchase at the Apple Store.

Apple recently lowered the price of the Studio Display XDR - Nano-texture glass - VESA mount adapter configuration you ordered.

We are pleased to inform you that we will provide you with a refund for the difference between the price you paid and the new, lower price.
 
Still overpriced for a monitor that has only *1* input. HDMI 2.1 and DP2.1 are a thing. Apple own Macs come with HDMI 2.1. So why does their expensive monitor not have at least HDMI 2.1 as well?

Why should it?

People here have been screaming about the usefulness and versatility of usb c for years.

Frankly, I don’t see a reason for any laptop to contain any port other than usb c.

And while the manufacturers are at it, can they start including usb c ports in televisions already? I would like to be able to connect my switch directly to it with a single cable without the need for a dedicated dock setup.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Nugget
Why should it?

People here have been screaming about the usefulness and versatility of usb c for years.

Frankly, I don’t see a reason for any laptop to contain any port other than usb c.

And while the manufacturers are at it, can they start including usb c ports in televisions already? I would like to be able to connect my switch directly to it with a single cable without the need for a dedicated dock setup.
PCs for example with discrete video cards don’t have usb-c video outputs… the thunderbolt/usb-c outputs on PC motherboards are usually connected only to the integrated graphics, not the discrete GPU. So for gaming, that’s problematic.

Also, Apple calls it a “Studio” display. But in a Studio or even a home office, a user might have more than one computing device. It’s very common. A user might have a Mac for some tasks, and a Windows PC or laptop for other tasks and/or for gaming. Having only 1 input on a monitor will make it difficult and annoying to use with multiple devices. Having multiple video inputs on the other hand makes makes this process much more seamless. Given the cost of the monitor, it’s a shame it has one input, in my opinion.
 
PCs for example with discrete video cards don’t have usb-c video outputs… the thunderbolt/usb-c outputs on PC motherboards are usually connected only to the integrated graphics, not the discrete GPU. So for gaming, that’s problematic.
I think it's unreasonable to be grumpy at Apple for not catering to the PC and gaming market with their displays. If they had extra ports I might find a use for them, but I am comfortable with the reality that Apple have no real reason to spend development time and money trying to address those markets. Even if these displays had an HDMI or DP input, then you'd just be complaining that there's no built-in support for settings or adjusting brightness or any of the other UI affordances and controls that general monitors need to provide in order to work well with every possible input source imaginable.
 
Could you recommend a 5K mini-LED monitor with 99.7% P3 and 99.5% Adobe RGB coverage, true 10-bit color, HDR, 120 Hz, Thunderbolt 5, and a built-in webcam for around $1,500?

Not to mention that it gets up to 1,000 nits in SDR and 2,000 in HDR. Good luck finding an OLED that does that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: slatina
Embarrassing...

drake-embarrassing.gif
 
I don’t think the original iPhone from almost 20 years ago is a fair comparison in the slightest, but I hear your point.

I don’t agree with it being “smart business” since we’re talking about a multi trillion dollar company. Whether they do it or not, it won’t hurt them. And I think we all know their customers are going to be loyal regardless.

My point is leaning into the post 14 day area. If I make a purchase that I’m no longer able to return and Apple then brings down the price, they don’t owe me anything at all.

I don't disagree that they technically owe you nothing. Nor did they owe anyone anything back in 2007, although I understand you deem that a moot point. Certainly the company was in a very different place back then, and that sacrifice was probably more important with a more mass market product for a company that was not yet the behemoth it would become.

But I suppose we can agree to disagree on whether it's smart business to not embitter some subset of customers, even if the rules were laid out explicitly for everyone to see. It sounds like Apple decided it was the smart thing to do, given they have now proactively contacted customers to provide that refund.

I personally think there is a balance between extracting every last dollar you can from a customer on any given transaction vs. how you think about customer lifetime value, which can very much be affected by someone's perception of that company's treatment of its customers.
 
Could you recommend a 5K mini-LED monitor with 99.7% P3 and 99.5% Adobe RGB coverage, true 10-bit color, HDR, 120 Hz, Thunderbolt 5, and a built-in webcam for around $1,500?

FYI, per the discussion over here (https://forums.macrumors.com/thread...-low-prices-on-expercom.2480979/post-34544199), LG finally released their pricing of their version of the panel the XDR uses. Not quite the same specs, and monitor only, but $1200:

 
  • Love
Reactions: slatina
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.