You present your opinion as fact often, as I have seen repeatedly. You repeatedly tell people they must have no experience of any other versions of windows, you even tried to shoot down a guy that had used windows for over 15 years or so, just because you didn't like his opinion.
A terrible UI does make for a terrible OS, you cannot separate the two. As much as you say 'don't judge a book by it's cover', first impressions count, the UI gives the first impression.
The fact Microsoft have brought windows 9 forwards (as it was going to be 8.2), means they know it's a tarnished OS.
Again, the fact they're bringing back a start menu at all, means they know they screwed up. Look at all the people that got excited when they said the start button was coming back, but then slammed Microsoft as it just took people to the metro start screen. Even microsoft can acknowledge they screwed up with windows 8, but you can't admit it's failings for other people.
Again, you can tell when you're flailing in a debate as you drag other OS's into your responses, as usual. Surprised you didn't go to your usual stable of bringing Linux into your post. Other OS's were not the point of the debate. It was on Windows 8. You can't defend an OS by saying that other OS is worse. If you can't defend the OS based on it's own merits, then you've lost any sense of credibility in the faith of your opinion.
