So, wait, being like, really really really busy is an actual valid excuse for huge breaches of customer privacy? The ways AT&T's website failed on Tuesday went far beyond what should be acceptable for a company that retains that much private customer data. Logging in to my online account should never present me with the name, address, phone number, etc of some random person halfway across the country.
AT&T's site didn't just choke under volume, it blew a gasket. People wound up with multiple orders, half of which they couldn't know about. The severity of the data exposure for accounts combined with their basic response being "we have yet to see that happened!" when confronted with numerous reports? Not acceptable, no matter how overwhelmed they were. The latest round of confusing cancellations--AT&T bouncing accounts back to Apple or not bouncing them or who knows--isn't looking good, either.
But for some reason, it doesn't give me a warm fuzzy feeling to know my wireless carrier's reaction to being overly busy is playing mix-and-match with logins and account data, and the 'punish the customer' attitude that's come through with the cancellations (if you're cancelling orders as secret duplicates, for the love of god, mass e-mail the people you're cancelling with this heads-up, don't just serve random cancel notices and call it good) does make them look bad.
So really all it does mean is, should the Verizon iPhone materialize, there's a good reason to keep a close eye on how Verizon handles the added traffic.