Apple has a good trust relationship with its customers. Goldman Sachs on the other-hand has a proven track record of sleaze. Apple partnering with them totally ridiculous. 
Apple has had a credit card for years.Oh God please no.. please don’t make a flipping credit card Apple, it’s so not your line of business..
Apple has had a credit card for years.
[doublepost=1550764064][/doublepost]MC? Not much interested in picking up Costco customers I guess.
https://www.apple.com/shop/browse/financingReally? Where? Must be in the US only?
Goldman Sachs? Of all the companies to partner with. Goldman Sachs.
But this is probably for all your cards!In other words, like every other credit card in my actual wallet. Spending goals, tracking rewards, and managing balances are already done in every credit card app on my iPhone.
So innovative.
https://www.apple.com/shop/browse/financing
Apple has had an arrangement with Barclay for a long time. I don't know if it actually says Apple on the card itself though.
No, no credit card in the UK has Apple or its logo on it so far as I know.
Plus all that link does is provide rewards from Apple, it is not an actual credit card by Apple.
The card does exist for US only as far as I know, but they do offer financing through Barclay in the UK. Not sure if they will send you an actual card after checkout but you do have to run a credit check for it. The US card is Apple branded though. https://www.apple.com/shop/browse/financing
It does.https://www.apple.com/shop/browse/financing
Apple has had an arrangement with Barclay for a long time. I don't know if it actually says Apple on the card itself though.
It seems they are trying to enter the retail banking business. They recently launched a savings and loans online banking service called "Marcus".This is odd...Goldman Sachs, at least in the US, doesn't have a large credit card business.
Your “garbage organization” has fully one third of its employees working on a new financial services platform set to revolutionize banking when they roll it out in 2020. Apple is playing it smart on this one.Goldman Sachs? Of all the companies to partner with. Goldman Sachs.
/walks away slowly shaking head in disappointment
Goldman Sachs is a literal hot garbage organization.
Good catch, “Marcus” is their pilot program and test vehicle for devs working on the new services platform.It seems they are trying to enter the retail banking business. They recently launched a savings and loans online banking service called "Marcus".
Goldman Sachs? Of all the companies to partner with. Goldman Sachs.
/walks away slowly shaking head in disappointment
Goldman Sachs is a literal hot garbage organization.
GS is a hot garbage organization. What they are working on doesn't matter. No amount of revolutionizing financial services platform is going to make them any less despicable. For a company that likes to project a morally upright image, Apple surely chose the worst company to partner with on this venture.Your “garbage organization” has fully one third of its employees working on a new financial services platform set to revolutionize banking when they roll it out in 2020. Apple is playing it smart on this one.
You need to learn how to interpret context.1. You need to learn what the word “literal” means.
2. If you think Goldman is a garbage organization you need to diversify your news sources.
He knew how to interpret your post. Your use of the word was still incorrect.GS is a hot garbage organization. What they are working on doesn't matter. No amount of revolutionizing financial services platform is going to make them any less despicable. For a company that likes to project a morally upright image, Apple surely chose the worst company to partner with on this venture.
Whatever you think of GS is your business. I think GS is straight doo doo.
[doublepost=1550769123][/doublepost]
You need to learn how to interpret context.Why do you think the word literal is bolded? It's a play on the corruption of the oft used literal when people actually mean figurative. I mean, I even put emoji there for additional clues.
I might need to diversify my news sources. But one of those sources surely won't be a snark infused, information deficient comment from some random guy on the internet. Present an opposing viewpoint. Otherwise, I'll continue to hold my viewpoint that Goldman is crap.