You can't claim that without knowing how much Apple will pay to Qualcomm.
Sure I can. I can do whatever I want.
And since I know patent law, readers can choose to believe me or not, as they wish.
You can't claim that without knowing how much Apple will pay to Qualcomm.
Yeah, there is also such thing as the law. The company that violates the law usually is the one who pays regardless of who may lose more.What he is saying is the side that has more to lose will will offer the biggest gain or loss in market price, compared to the stable company.
What is so difficult to understand?
I am not sure many people will believe you after statements like thatSure I can. I can do whatever I want.
And since I know patent law, readers can choose to believe me or not, as they wish.
The fact that Qualcomm stock is up more than Apple shows exactly the opposite of what you say. Markets in this case wouldn’t reward the “winner” but the company that had more to lose, because if Qualcomm stock goes up it means that now their outlook is more positive than it was before the settlement. Clearly not a lot changed for Apple if their stock didn’t move, in the eyes of investors.
Lol. Qualcomm caved because under exhaustion law their business model would have been toast.
Seriously, after all these years of growing romantic tension…Get a room guys.
If the agreement includes a patent license, as it must, Apple is free to make their own devices. Given that Qualcomm is under antitrust scrutiny they couldn’t have required apple not to compete against them.I wonder if the licensing agreement includes Apple's modem plans. We know they want to build their own and are rumored to build their own. Call it the B1 or whatever when it comes out. B for baseband.
Yeah... no.
If Apple’s stock jumped 15% at nearly a trillion dollar value you’re talking BILLIONS of dollars just got bought worth of stocks.
If Qualcomm goes up 15% on an 84 billion dollar value you’re talking millions of dollars were invested. They were also down considerably because the FTC case isn’t looking so hot and they’re trying to settle that one out of court as well.
TLDR: Qualcomm won the war!
Apple and Qualcomm just kicked off a legal battle over unpaid royalty rebates in a San Diego court, but the case will be cut short as the two companies have reached a settlement.
Apple announced the news in a press release this afternoon. Apple says the settlement includes a payment from Apple to Qualcomm and a six-year licensing agreement for Qualcomm's technologies.
The settlement ends all ongoing litigation between the two companies, including with Apple's contract manufacturers. All companies involved have reached a global patent license agreement and a chipset supply agreement, suggesting Apple may be planning to once again use Qualcomm chips in its devices going forward.![]()
The legal battle dates back to 2017, when Apple sued Qualcomm for over $1 billion in unpaid royalty rebates, accusing the San Diego chip company of anticompetitive patent licensing practices.
Apple in its lawsuit claimed that Qualcomm had "unfairly insisted" on collecting royalties for "technologies they have nothing to do with," while Qualcomm said that its technology is "at the heart of every iPhone. The original lawsuit spawned a bitter legal battle between the two companies, which led to patent disputes and import bans in multiple countries, all of which will now be resolved.
Apple had also stopped using Qualcomm chips in its devices due to the ongoing legal troubles, opting for an all Intel chip lineup in 2018. Recent rumors have, however, suggested that Apple's plans to use Intel's 5G chips for its 2020 iPhones may fall through due to Intel's production delays, which may have been a factor in Apple's decision to come to an agreement with Qualcomm.
Article Link: Apple and Qualcomm Reach Settlement, Agree to Drop All Litigation
Yeah, there is also such thing as the law. The company that violates the law usually is the one who pays regardless of who may lose more.
That’s nonsense. They didn’t fight it because Qualcomm caved, and the new license is no longer unfair. Any lawyer will tell you that Qualcomm charging a patent license fee when you already buy their chips violates Supreme Court precedent.
It looks like, unlike many posters on MR, Apple realised that they were in serious trouble with the delay of 5G till 2021. Hence the quick settlement. Now they have enough time to put Qualcomm's 5G modems in the 2020 models.
Apple caved.
If Apple really believed Qualcomm's patents were unfair, they would have fought this to the end. Instead, Apple just signed a 6 year licensing deal with Qualcomm, "including a two-year option to extend, and a multiyear chipset supply agreement."
Lol. Qualcomm caved because under exhaustion law their business model would have been toast.
Qualcomm sells the license first, then sells the hardware. Not the other way around.