Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Oh CoPilot in Visual Studio is an absolute dream. It can take the work out of repetitive and easy to miss small errors like lightning.

I haven’t dabbled in Xcode as much (yet) but I seen its completion feature. Still useful but not comparable to Copilot which is out there today, working right now
I think this might require internet am I right? Apple Intelligence might not since it’s on device…
 
It's really a bad era for Apple.
They miss all the opportunities, put lot of money in useless products and have lost their capacity to make people "dream" or show the future.
They have only kept the marketing language, they continue to rely on past innovations (iPhone) and earn more and more money, but they have completely lost their creativity and agility.
Apple is too big to move, they are still super good and innovative in hardware (chips) but software is nowhere and so far from agile competitors.
 
Oh CoPilot in Visual Studio is an absolute dream. It can take the work out of repetitive and easy to miss small errors like lightning.

I haven’t dabbled in Xcode as much (yet) but I seen its completion feature. Still useful but not comparable to Copilot which is out there today, working right now
There is a Copilot plugin for Xcode, not super stable (as it needs hacks to integrate with Xcode), but very useful.

 
  • Like
Reactions: wanha
I wish there were such a thing as ‘ethical investors’. No, not things like wind turbines or electric cars… actual ethical decisions like “Government C doesn’t like AI? Let’s prepare to leave that market” and “Government U wants our users data and a back door? Let’s prepare to leave that market”.

Yeah it’d cost shareholders but their ethics would see it as value for money. It’s a shame that nothing of the sort truly exists today despite some smart self appointed fund names

feels like we are still a tad immature for that as a species, but hopefully we'll get there
 
This is funny....Gruber drops his article criticizing Apple. The next day, after some moments of reflection, MacRumors authors realize they too can criticize Apple -- "Wait, we can actually say bad things about Apple that's frustrating the piss out of us? Cool!"

Yes, MacRumors, you can be upset, and you should post about it when you are.
 
We're now in the era of Apple where they've gained so much visibility in the marketplace and billions depend on their services daily that the release cycle must take longer before deploying them to the public for consumption. In theory, they should withhold their announcements until they can be released rather than staggered suggestions that fall flat.
 
The simple answer is - anyone dedicated on AI projects was fully pushing on the consumer AI side, developer tools are always an afterthought.
100%.

But dev tools are equally as important, if not even more, and Apple needs to understand that. Because developers create millions of apps, which means millions of user experiences that extend the stock iOS.
 
Ohhh so sad… then yeah not a big deal but bad for apple reputation
Technically, with current hardware, it's impossible to have a complex LLM running locally.
Apple has announced that Swift assist will rely on their "private" cloud, it's impossible to make this running locally on normal Macs (or you will need to by an M4Ultra with 512Gb of RAM).
It's not an issue, it can be secure and private.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MacCheetah3
I would love to see some actual humility out of Apple at WWDC this year. Some realistic statements, announcing things that are actually ready to be released at least in beta, things like that.

So tired of being patronized to every year. These pre-recorded formats are not good for Apple. They are already far too much in their own bubble. They need feedback, even if it's just from their carefully chosen friendly audience members.
Coming to iPhone this fall…. Wait we meant next fall.
 
We're now in the era of Apple where they've gained so much visibility in the marketplace and billions depend on their services daily that the release cycle must take longer before deploying them to the public for consumption. In theory, they should withhold their announcements until they can be released rather than staggered suggestions that fall flat.
I think the "WWDC time" every June is not something sustainable now.
It's impossible to freeze one year of announcements and development in areas where news are coming every 2 weeks.
They should got to something more agile and showcase features end technologies when they are almost ready and don't try to pack everything in a monolithic keynote with long term promises that are obsolete before they ara available.
 
I'm surprised to hear, that other LLMs are not good at Swift Code. Is there not enough code publicly available to train them on?

I'd guess it's more a case that there's a lot of dated code out there. Swift went through quite a rapid evolution, so if you look at answers on StackOverflow there's usually at least two or three new answers where the code has been updated to be compatible with the latest Swift syntax. Any AI being trained on that could miss that context and return a mishmash of code that mixes new and old syntax together (I had something similar with ChatGPT recently where it used "docker-control" and "docker control" interchangeably).
 
This whole thing is bad looking.
Same as the removal of the oxygen sensor functionality in the Apple Watch.
 
Last edited:
  • Haha
Reactions: blob.DK
Maps is an app, not the operating system. If ads start popping up in the Dock that will be a step too far.
It is part of the operating system. As I said, Apple deliberately chose to integrate their apps deeply into the OS, making them an integral part of it. They can’t even update them without updating the OS.
 
Certainly not good PR for apple. These two recent serious failings could really stick and damage apple's reputation. They need to be clear and only demonstrate features and tools that they can release. It's not a time to demonstrate ideas at such public events as WWDC. For all the hard work the teams have put in, it would be sad to see.
 
I wish apple would go back to

- not doing a full public release of features which are labelled 'in beta' to the public. (I should not be using premium consumer electronics with a warning saying 'this might not work' next to a button).

- not doing a full public release of features which are not labelled 'in beta' but are clearly not ready.

- not announcing things which aren't ready for release within 2 weeks.

Apple were at their best when they were late to the party, but the best dressed person there and owned the room. Now they still turn up late, but look an absolute mess, are already drunk and are rambling about how great they are.
 
"AI is not that big a deal..." Well, Apple made it a big deal. People have already spent money on this promise. This doesn't happen every year I don't believe.

I didn’t quite say that. But I suppose what might help clear it up, is to say: Apple makes everything a big deal, and AI being no different, it is probably overblown. And perhaps in comparison to other manufacturers their products are a big deal.

(And excluding rumors) it is perhaps not every year, but I imagine if you watched every WWDC from the last 20 years you’d encounter nearly 20 announcements that never arrived within a reasonable timeframe stated (or just never released) everything from ‘iTunes sharing’ to that 3 device charger.
 
  • Like
Reactions: sunapple
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.