Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
This sounds like PR talk. Apple is really expecting everyone to research safety of one of their products? Things like this are reasons why this 15+ year Apple lover have started to care less and less about Apple products and news. They might be successful and making money now, but those tides can change quickly. Yes, I know people have said that for years, but you can only throw so many stones at a glass house before it finally breaks.
 
  • Like
Reactions: timborama
That's nice and dandy, but it still offers no default detection on Android devices. Apple should have worked with Google to bake in the automatic detection on Android devices via an update. If they need to pay to have it implemented, they should be doing so.

Telling Android users that they need to download an app and proactively scan for the trackers is absurd.

They should not have released the product without this safeguard. This is not the way to attract people to switch to Apple.
What do Tile and Samsung do?! AirTag had anti tracking features from day one, they are just refining. The Irony is that a lot of people do not want this behavior as they want to use it as an anti theft device …
 
Sweet, now when I'm on the train and I get an alert that someone else on the train has an AirTag, I'll be able to precisely located the item they have which is valuable enough they put an AirTag on it. So I can take it.
No you will not get an alert, only when the owner is not in reach of it’s own AirTag you will get an alert (and only after some time not immediately). So your comment makes no sense.
 
They opened Pandora’s Box with these things. People should look after stuff.
You’re right, this is a really tricky product. And given Apple stance on privacy, Apple is going to have to be on the defense moving forward with this product to make it as secure as possible, even though that’s probably not entirely possible.

So I can certainly see some revisions coming in the future with the AirTags, but I mentioned it before in this thread already, I’m not sure how long this product will actually be in their lineup. I’d say for a few years at minimum, but long-term, is it profitable enough for them to keep the AirTag as an accessory product or are the ‘risks outweighing the rewards’ per se.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jim Lahey
So anyone who wants the full set of protections against unwanted tracking has to own recent Apple devices? Apple should give everybody, including non-iOS users, the same capabilities.
Also people without phones? How do you figure that will work? :)

Apple should have worked with Google to bake in the automatic detection on Android devices via an update.
Yeah but would Google be interested in that, though? I don't think that's at all a given.

Apple is not transparent about anything,
There are at times very transparent about things. For example, the CSAM detection system that everyone here seems to hate, was documented and described in great detail throughout many documents and even a paper.

You can opt out by using an Android smartphone.

As least that's what I'd imagine Apple and their fanboys would tell you. They'd say it's their software, that you agreed to their Terms of Use, etc.
You can also opt out on the iPhone, so...
 
AirTag is intended solely to track items that belong to you.

Whilst these updates are great for prevention of unwanted tracking of people (which is of course important), it unfortunately makes them even more useless for tracking stolen goods.

If I have an AirTag in a bag with a valuable item in, and my car is broken into and that bag is stolen, these updates will surely alert the criminal pretty immediately, and help them locate the AirTag.

So what are AirTags actually useful for? Locating you lost house keys? Locating a lost item of little value to a theft? Is that it? ??‍♂️
 
AirTag is intended solely to track items that belong to you.

Whilst these updates are great for prevention of unwanted tracking of people (which is of course important), it unfortunately makes them even more useless for tracking stolen goods.

If I have an AirTag in a bag with a valuable item in, and my car is broken into and that bag is stolen, these updates will surely alert the criminal pretty immediately, and help them locate the AirTag.

So what are AirTags actually useful for? Locating you lost house keys? Locating a lost item of little value to a theft? Is that it? ??‍♂️
yes you just answered your own question, they are for locating your own item you have lost, e.g. locating your keys in your house. unfortunately there is no way to be able to give people the power to track a thief with your stolen item without also giving them the power to stalk people without their consent.
 
If an airtag is tracking you that's not yours, Apple should make it trackable to you, so you can locate the airtag owner and...return it.
 
  • Disagree
Reactions: Vol Braakzakje
Yeah but would Google be interested in that, though? I don't think that's at all a given.
Sure they would, for the right price. Google pays apple billions of dollars per year for google to remain the default search. I'm not saying Apple needs to pay billions for this feature with google, but something could have been worked out. After all this does not affect google's bottom line.
 
AirTags are such a sad product for me. So much potential, so many ideas, all ruined by whiners crying over nonsense concerns. You can buy GPS trackers for cheap and have much better-stalking capability. Apple absolutely ruined the use of this product.

And before you respond "IT IS AN ITEM FINDER NOT THEFT DETTERANT" it barely even works like that now, say I lost my bag in the airport, after just a few hours its beeping and screaming PLEASE REMOVE ME.
A beeping unattended bag at an airport would probably result with the security going bananas.
 
A good point, but I think it’s a bit of a false equivalence. Not really the same thing as billions of tech consumers suddenly being romanced by a tech giant into buying shiny new tech products that allow them to lose their car keys without consequence and that also just happen to be covert digital surveillance tech.

The point wasn't equivalence - the point was that Pandora's box was wide open before AirTags were released.

Stuff like T-Mobile's SyncUp Tracker or Verizon's SmartLocator aren't exactly unheard of products from tiny unknown companies.

... and there's no means to detect if being tracked with one of these.

People warned about unforeseen consequences and repercussions with these things long before they were released. They were largely dismissed, and yet now here we are with Apple scrambling to add mitigations. Some will disagree, of course, and that’s fine, but personally I think these kinds of devices are a slippery slope. Full Pandora‘s Box.
That's a mischaracterization. Mitigations were present the day AirTags launched. They're being enhanced/adjusted as would be anticipated.

Care to discuss what mitigation strategy Tile has or Samsung has with their SmartTags and how they compare to Apple's?
 
Last edited:
Shouldn't you want the thief to be tracked, and shouldn't the thief find you tracking them to be "unwanted tracking"?

If the thief riding your bike away or carrying your Nintendo Switch carry case with a tag in it gets alerted then what's the point of these tags. If your bike is where you last left it then why would you need to track it.

AirTags aren't marketed as theft-recovery trackers. They're intended for you to find stuff you've lost/misplaced, or alert you that you've left something behind. They're not marketed as a device to track stuff that's been stolen.

Product page might help you better understand the intent: https://www.apple.com/airtag/
 
AirTags aren't marketed as theft-recovery trackers. They're intended for you to find stuff you've lost/misplaced, or alert you that you've left something behind. They're not marketed as a device to track stuff that's been stolen.

Product page might help you better understand the intent: https://www.apple.com/airtag/
Right, so they are useless for anything except saving you 2 minutes of finding your keys you left at home. This is such a dumb take I wish people would stop posting it. When apple first released it, it was a wonderful product that could be used to track stolen items and do so much more. I was going to buy 4 of them, 1 for my laptop bag, 1 for my car, 1 for my bike, and 1 for my keys. Same with my wife.

Apple then began nerfing it, so now its useless for us and for many other people in the name of whiney people who complain about literally nothing (given there are far better-stalking tools).

Apple could have easily made it so the airtag goes into lost/stolen mode after 8 hours or whatever and only the police or whatever can track it from there. That way it would have been an antitheft and antilost device.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Vol Braakzakje
Care to discuss what mitigation strategy Tile has or Samsung has with their SmartTags and how they compare to Apple's?

For me it’s not about Apple vs. anyone. I think the whole concept is opening Pandora’s Box. You don’t have to agree. I’m not arguing, I just don’t like ‘em.
 
For me it’s not about Apple vs. anyone. I think the whole concept is opening Pandora’s Box. You don’t have to agree. I’m not arguing, I just don’t like ‘em.

Ah, okay. Seemed like you were merely referring to AirTags - the one product with a real mitigation strategy - rather than all the other devices with similar capabilities.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Jim Lahey
Right, so they are useless for anything except saving you 2 minutes of finding your keys you left at home. This is such a dumb take I wish people would stop posting it. When apple first released it, it was a wonderful product that could be used to track stolen items and do so much more. I was going to buy 4 of them, 1 for my laptop bag, 1 for my car, 1 for my bike, and 1 for my keys. Same with my wife.

Apple then began nerfing it, so now its useless for us and for many other people in the name of whiney people who complain about literally nothing (given there are far better-stalking tools).

Apple could have easily made it so the airtag goes into lost/stolen mode after 8 hours or whatever and only the police or whatever can track it from there. That way it would have been an antitheft and antilost device.

My understanding - based on reading posts in the Airtag subforum - is that it's several hours (or longer) before there's any notification. Thus you'd have a window of time for recovering something if that's your use case. I see nothing in the article suggesting that delay would be shortened.

Might be worth reading some of people's actual experiences with the devices before passing judgement on something you've not actually used?
 
Looks like Apple put as much deep thought into AT as it did into the CSAM spying software. I think AT might be fixable. The CSAM spying software is not.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dk001
I feel like the airtags I bought to help prevent theft of my bikes just became useless. They already notified a thief of something following with them, now they're easier to find and remove. Not a great solution for my situation to be sure. Anyone else in the same situation?
 
  • Like
Reactions: VulchR
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.