But are they really in "control of their destiny" if they aren't manufacturing anything themselves?
It wouldn't be economical for Apple to own and operate their own silicon foundries.
But are they really in "control of their destiny" if they aren't manufacturing anything themselves?
Or is it a thing on ma rumors.
Keep in mind the size of these manufacturing companies. All they do is focus on manufacturing and they are quite large, with many many headaches to manage (staying current, regulations, waste disposal, etc). I don't see why Apple would take that on themselves. Governments would also likely block Apple from acquiring one due to anti-trust concerns.I understand Apple's need to bring design in-house from SOCs to modems in order to quote better "control their destiny" . But are they really in "control of their destiny" if they aren't manufacturing anything themselves? At the end of the day they are still beholden to Foxconn or TSMC or in this case Broadcom. Sometimes I wish we'd go back to the days when Apple owned and had their own manufacturing facilities in the US. In a broader sense, I was hoping that the supply chain issues of the last few years would have taught businesses to stop trying to abstratify and overly optimize everything. Just-In-Time supply chains sound great on paper, but if the country you manufacture or get parts from shuts down, then you're just stuck.
Apple will not do manufacturing in house. They just diversify there supply chain to lower cost. Recently Apple has been trying to do modem and screens in house to get away from the high cost of Samsung and Qualcomm doing it for them, but only time will tell if they can achieve this.I understand Apple's need to bring design in-house from SOCs to modems in order to quote better "control their destiny" . But are they really in "control of their destiny" if they aren't manufacturing anything themselves? At the end of the day they are still beholden to Foxconn or TSMC or in this case Broadcom. Sometimes I wish we'd go back to the days when Apple owned and had their own manufacturing facilities in the US. In a broader sense, I was hoping that the supply chain issues of the last few years would have taught businesses to stop trying to abstratify and overly optimize everything. Just-In-Time supply chains sound great on paper, but if the country you manufacture or get parts from shuts down, then you're just stuck.
I wonder why Apple didn’t want to use TSMC for there 5G chips 🤔Broadcom isn't Qualcomm... I think you might be mixing those two up.
Broadcom would manufacture Apple's 5G modems and related components, in the same way TSMC manufactures Apple Silicon chips.
Nothing to suggest that, Broadcom make other components that Apple use for 5G, it’s more likely they will support the manufacturing process of those associated chips and support embedding other wireless functions into the modem.So they couldn't figure out how to make their own 5G modem and had to go crawling back to Broadcom.
The release specifies supporting design AND manufacturing at has several key American manufacturing and technology hubs, including Fort Collins, Colorado, where Broadcom has a major facility.Well, I'm not sure it's the same. Is Broadcom a contract fab for competing 5G modems? TSMC doesn't design chips. Their IP is the process for chip fab.
I think that may still ultimately be the goal, and this partnership is likely to get them there. since Broadcom have a variety of BT/Wifi and other wireless expertise + already supplying Apple, they’re the best partner to support in the non modem aspects.So it doesn’t sound like apple will be making its own all in one cellular modem + Wi-Fi radio + Bluetooth radio after all?
Rumors = fake news?
They have a facility in fort collins, Colorado for design AND manufacture.I don't think Broadcom has any foundries. They're a fabless company. Broadcom could very well be using TSMC for manufacturing their chips.
Broadcom has end to end networking switches and expertise in 5G. Apple Engineers could leverage Broadcom’s 5 G research experience and automation.I wonder why Apple didn’t want to use TSMC for there 5G chips 🤔
Obv I did not. I was too excited to get my stupid comment in "first," and it wasn't even accurate. I'm the world's first person to do that on the Internet.Do you guys think before typing and trashing some one? Or is it a thing on ma rumors. Qualcomm and Broadcom or entirely different companies. The investment sounds to be in automation, probably manufacturing. Apple works closely with TSMC for its processors.
They have a facility in fort collins, Colorado for design AND manufacture.
Apple will make the modems, Broadcom will manufacture them. Similar to how Apple makes the iPhone processors and TSMC manufacturers them.
Well, I'm not sure it's the same. Is Broadcom a contract fab for competing 5G modems? TSMC doesn't design chips. Their IP is the process for chip fab.
Broadcom isn't Qualcomm... I think you might be mixing those two up.
Broadcom would manufacture Apple's 5G modems and related components, in the same way TSMC manufactures Apple Silicon chips.
You may be confusing Broadcom with Qualcomm?So they couldn't figure out how to make their own 5G modem and had to go crawling back to Broadcom.
I think you may be thinking of another company, Qualcomm (completely different company than Broadcom)?So they couldn't figure out how to make their own 5G modem and had to go crawling back to Broadcom.
make, manufacture.... those 2 words mean the same thing.Apple will make the modems, Broadcom will manufacture them. Similar to how Apple makes the iPhone processors and TSMC manufacturers them.
The original Apple press release provided a bit more context.Where is Apple getting 430 billions over 5 years? They are valued near three trillion, but thats not actual money, just valuation. On top revenue vs net income.
These investments are part of the commitment Apple made in 2021 to invest $430 billion in the U.S. economy over five years. Today, Apple is on pace to meet its target through direct spend with American suppliers, data center investments, capital expenditures in the U.S., and other domestic spend.
Broadcom is not fabless.I don't think Broadcom has any foundries. They're a fabless company. Broadcom could very well be using TSMC for manufacturing their chips.
We use our internal fabrication facilities for products utilizing our innovative and proprietary processes, such as our FBAR [film bulk acoustic resonator] filters for wireless communications and our vertical-cavity surface emitting laser and side emitting lasers ... based on GaAs [gallium arsenide] and InP [indium phosphide] lasers for fiber optic communications, while outsourcing commodity processes such as standard CMOS [complementary metal-oxide semiconductor]. By doing so, we can protect our IP [intellectual property] and accelerate time to market for our products.
The multi-year agreement with Broadcom will see Apple use 5G radio frequency and wireless connectivity components, including FBAR filters, that are designed and manufactured in the U.S.
Diversification.I wonder why Apple didn’t want to use TSMC for there 5G chips 🤔
So they couldn't figure out how to make their own 5G modem and had to go crawling back to Broadcom.
make, manufacture.... those 2 words mean the same thing.
Apple will design the modems. Broadcom will make/manufacture them using Apple's designs.
Remember when Broadcom tried to buy Qualcomm?You may be confusing Broadcom with Qualcomm?
Rumors aren't fake news. That's why we call them rumors.So it doesn’t sound like apple will be making its own all in one cellular modem + Wi-Fi radio + Bluetooth radio after all?
Rumors = fake news?
All the manufacturing will be back in the US once the TSMC fab in Arizona is up. I think it's Arizona. Eitherway, more manufacturing will be in the US. Which will limit (at the least) the supply chain issues we have seen.I understand Apple's need to bring design in-house from SOCs to modems in order to quote better "control their destiny" . But are they really in "control of their destiny" if they aren't manufacturing anything themselves? At the end of the day they are still beholden to Foxconn or TSMC or in this case Broadcom. Sometimes I wish we'd go back to the days when Apple owned and had their own manufacturing facilities in the US. In a broader sense, I was hoping that the supply chain issues of the last few years would have taught businesses to stop trying to abstratify and overly optimize everything. Just-In-Time supply chains sound great on paper, but if the country you manufacture or get parts from shuts down, then you're just stuck.