Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I understand Apple's need to bring design in-house from SOCs to modems in order to quote better "control their destiny" . But are they really in "control of their destiny" if they aren't manufacturing anything themselves? At the end of the day they are still beholden to Foxconn or TSMC or in this case Broadcom. Sometimes I wish we'd go back to the days when Apple owned and had their own manufacturing facilities in the US. In a broader sense, I was hoping that the supply chain issues of the last few years would have taught businesses to stop trying to abstratify and overly optimize everything. Just-In-Time supply chains sound great on paper, but if the country you manufacture or get parts from shuts down, then you're just stuck.
Keep in mind the size of these manufacturing companies. All they do is focus on manufacturing and they are quite large, with many many headaches to manage (staying current, regulations, waste disposal, etc). I don't see why Apple would take that on themselves. Governments would also likely block Apple from acquiring one due to anti-trust concerns.

At most I could see Apple eventually automating the final assembly with robots (just a large up front cost). Their recycling robot shows they can make a versatile operation.
 
I understand Apple's need to bring design in-house from SOCs to modems in order to quote better "control their destiny" . But are they really in "control of their destiny" if they aren't manufacturing anything themselves? At the end of the day they are still beholden to Foxconn or TSMC or in this case Broadcom. Sometimes I wish we'd go back to the days when Apple owned and had their own manufacturing facilities in the US. In a broader sense, I was hoping that the supply chain issues of the last few years would have taught businesses to stop trying to abstratify and overly optimize everything. Just-In-Time supply chains sound great on paper, but if the country you manufacture or get parts from shuts down, then you're just stuck.
Apple will not do manufacturing in house. They just diversify there supply chain to lower cost. Recently Apple has been trying to do modem and screens in house to get away from the high cost of Samsung and Qualcomm doing it for them, but only time will tell if they can achieve this.
 
Broadcom isn't Qualcomm... I think you might be mixing those two up.

Broadcom would manufacture Apple's 5G modems and related components, in the same way TSMC manufactures Apple Silicon chips.
I wonder why Apple didn’t want to use TSMC for there 5G chips 🤔
 
So they couldn't figure out how to make their own 5G modem and had to go crawling back to Broadcom.
Nothing to suggest that, Broadcom make other components that Apple use for 5G, it’s more likely they will support the manufacturing process of those associated chips and support embedding other wireless functions into the modem.
Well, I'm not sure it's the same. Is Broadcom a contract fab for competing 5G modems? TSMC doesn't design chips. Their IP is the process for chip fab.
The release specifies supporting design AND manufacturing at has several key American manufacturing and technology hubs, including Fort Collins, Colorado, where Broadcom has a major facility.
So it doesn’t sound like apple will be making its own all in one cellular modem + Wi-Fi radio + Bluetooth radio after all?

Rumors = fake news?
I think that may still ultimately be the goal, and this partnership is likely to get them there. since Broadcom have a variety of BT/Wifi and other wireless expertise + already supplying Apple, they’re the best partner to support in the non modem aspects.
I don't think Broadcom has any foundries. They're a fabless company. Broadcom could very well be using TSMC for manufacturing their chips.
They have a facility in fort collins, Colorado for design AND manufacture.
 
  • Like
Reactions: KENESS
Where is Apple getting 430 billions over 5 years? They are valued near three trillion, but thats not actual money, just valuation. On top revenue vs net income.
 
  • Like
Reactions: amartinez1660
Do you guys think before typing and trashing some one? Or is it a thing on ma rumors. Qualcomm and Broadcom or entirely different companies. The investment sounds to be in automation, probably manufacturing. Apple works closely with TSMC for its processors.
Obv I did not. I was too excited to get my stupid comment in "first," and it wasn't even accurate. I'm the world's first person to do that on the Internet.
 
They have a facility in fort collins, Colorado for design AND manufacture.
Apple will make the modems, Broadcom will manufacture them. Similar to how Apple makes the iPhone processors and TSMC manufacturers them.

Well, I'm not sure it's the same. Is Broadcom a contract fab for competing 5G modems? TSMC doesn't design chips. Their IP is the process for chip fab.

Broadcom isn't Qualcomm... I think you might be mixing those two up.

Broadcom would manufacture Apple's 5G modems and related components, in the same way TSMC manufactures Apple Silicon chips.

Everyone listen up. Broadcom has a few small fabs but those are old and outdated.

Broadcom does not possess 5nm and 3nm fabs needed to make advanced modem chips. Period.

Broadcom is largely fabless. They will not make any modems for Apple with their own fabs.

Stop spreading misinformation so confidently.
 
Nice Tim. Glad to hear you talking more about America. Keep moving as many components here as you can!
 
Apple will make the modems, Broadcom will manufacture them. Similar to how Apple makes the iPhone processors and TSMC manufacturers them.
make, manufacture.... those 2 words mean the same thing.

Apple will design the modems. Broadcom will make/manufacture them using Apple's designs.
 
  • Like
Reactions: krakenrelease
Where is Apple getting 430 billions over 5 years? They are valued near three trillion, but thats not actual money, just valuation. On top revenue vs net income.
The original Apple press release provided a bit more context.

These investments are part of the commitment Apple made in 2021 to invest $430 billion in the U.S. economy over five years. Today, Apple is on pace to meet its target through direct spend with American suppliers, data center investments, capital expenditures in the U.S., and other domestic spend.

Basically Apple will spend $430 billion in the US over 5 years. Not so much a true investment.
 
I don't think Broadcom has any foundries. They're a fabless company. Broadcom could very well be using TSMC for manufacturing their chips.
Broadcom is not fabless.


Can Apple really ditch Broadcom?

Besides providing a multitude of components, there's another very important reason Apple may not be able to completely part ways with Broadcom. Broadcom is often referred to as a "fabless" chip company -- meaning it only designs silicon, and leaves the actual manufacturing of chips to third-party partners like Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing. Of chip wafers used by Broadcom's manufacturing partners, 90% came from TSMC last year.

But calling Broadcom "fabless" is a bit of a misnomer. Buried in its 2022 annual filing is the fact that it has retained a few small chip fab plants of its own -- one in Singapore; one in Breinigsville, Pennsylvania; and one in Fort Collins, Colorado. These fabs were a very small part of its business, but an important part. According to Broadcom:


We use our internal fabrication facilities for products utilizing our innovative and proprietary processes, such as our FBAR [film bulk acoustic resonator] filters for wireless communications and our vertical-cavity surface emitting laser and side emitting lasers ... based on GaAs [gallium arsenide] and InP [indium phosphide] lasers for fiber optic communications, while outsourcing commodity processes such as standard CMOS [complementary metal-oxide semiconductor]. By doing so, we can protect our IP [intellectual property] and accelerate time to market for our products.

The Fort Collins fab is of particular interest here, since Broadcom says it is the sole supplier of FBAR components used in its wireless devices, like those WiFi and Bluetooth components.

The takeaway? Apple has done some impressive silicon work, but designing chips is only part of the battle. It will also need to find a way to manufacture some of these wireless components, and like-for-like replacement fab technology for Broadcom simply may not exist -- at least not without the risk of running afoul of Broadcom's intellectual property rights.



FBAR... that's what Apple is using Broadcom for.

The multi-year agreement with Broadcom will see Apple use 5G radio frequency and wireless connectivity components, including FBAR filters, that are designed and manufactured in the U.S.
 
Last edited:
I understand Apple's need to bring design in-house from SOCs to modems in order to quote better "control their destiny" . But are they really in "control of their destiny" if they aren't manufacturing anything themselves? At the end of the day they are still beholden to Foxconn or TSMC or in this case Broadcom. Sometimes I wish we'd go back to the days when Apple owned and had their own manufacturing facilities in the US. In a broader sense, I was hoping that the supply chain issues of the last few years would have taught businesses to stop trying to abstratify and overly optimize everything. Just-In-Time supply chains sound great on paper, but if the country you manufacture or get parts from shuts down, then you're just stuck.
All the manufacturing will be back in the US once the TSMC fab in Arizona is up. I think it's Arizona. Eitherway, more manufacturing will be in the US. Which will limit (at the least) the supply chain issues we have seen.

Plus manufacturing it themselves, meaning they own the fabs. Would be costly. Maybe in 10 more years it would be justifiable if the rest of the world goes to $..T.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.