Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Really? I doubt it, and 640K is enough RAM for everyone...gimme a break, Apple had a big opportunity and wasted it.

Most likely top end CPU; Core i7-4578U Passmark 5,204
Intel Iris 5100 Passmark 756 (nVidia 750M Passmark = 1505)

Good enough for Solitaire but not for FPS or "real games". Ugh...

The poster said everyday tasks. 99% of the consumer wold games on their iPads and iPhones now via casual games and the rest on consoles. If you think PC gaming has any significant impact on the industry you are delusional.
 
i7 is BTO now.

Capture.png


Even the i7 are dual cores? :confused:
 
probably, but for the same price you could build a nice little mini-itx hackintosh which much better hardware.

Did that, and a discrete GPU puts it over the $500, and I built mine with a Core I3. If I were to go to a desktop again and was on a budget, I'd rather do the Mini than roll another Hackintosh.. not that I don't like rolling my own, but I've done that for 20 years with Linux. Tired of doing that at home.

I have my MBA that I can use as a desktop, so when I get Yosemite installed, I'm pulling my hackintosh down, so I'll finally be legit and mobile.

BL.
 
ahhhhh no quads diapoinment

have been waiting for this for literary a year, really disapionting...
 
I am going to bet this has soldered RAM like the MBA too. So you'll be stuck with whatever amount it comes with after purchase.

it notes a max ram capacity of 16gb. Im sure the interior design is unchanged
 
Then don't purchase the base model ??

We all can't have top end specs at rock bottom pricing, sure you want that, hell so do I but it has never happened and it won't start today.
We all have to pay to play on better, faster equipment.

I see what you're saying, however 8GB is not top-end by a long shot.

Other than that, 4GB is barely passable, guess they're off the hook for that.

Glassed Silver:mac
 
Nope...you are mistaken...dual-core ONLY. Apple is officially dead to me. I'm tired of being let down over and over by Apple over promising and under delvering. (ref to "best product pipeline in 25 years" comment then only iMac is impressive).

Phrase "Officially dead to me" with regards to the cheapest Apple computer on the market IMHO = Officially overdramatic.:rolleyes:

Where are those promises you speak of, especially promises concerning Mac Mini?
 
Stop the insanity, are they going to put that 1.4 i5 chip on all macs now?
It's going to be overpowered by the iPad soon enough. Why does it exist?
 
The previous quad core model was too close to the entry Mac Pro in CPU power for dramatically less money. I'm now looking for the previous gen quad core on eBay since it'll be the last respectable mini anytime soon...this makes me so sad. I'd rather them had not update it at all than take it down several notches in power in this way. Argh! #
 
WTH Apple?? No quad core anymore?? That's really lame. We waited 2 years for you to cripple the Mac Mini with a dual core?
 
Last edited:
I see what you're saying, however 8GB is not top-end by a long shot.

Other than that, 4GB is barely passable, guess they're off the hook for that.

Glassed Silver:mac

No, it isn't but we both know that the true majority of people that buy the base model, just like the base model iPhone, etc. Those specs will work for them and that is what base models are built for.

I hate using the reference but base model vehicles, companies sell a ton of them and those that want better equipment have to pay for better equipment. This world isn't going to give away upgrades when there is more money to be made in charging for upgrades.
 
They never said anything about RAM.

4 in the low end, 8 in the other, BTO up to 16. Disappointed they didn't upgrade to allow more than that.

After this update, Apple needs an xMac more than ever. Or at least a reasonably priced entry level Mac Pro.

I wonder if the ram is soldered like the imac.

Hopefully we'll have clarification soon but it doesn't sound like it from the online store.

I also wonder if there are still SATA slots.

There must be if there are versions with hard drives.

Doesn't look like it will be the same as before. LPDDR3 is soldered on so not upgradeable. :mad:

Source?
 
A quick perusal of the likely cpu configurations in the new top end vs the old top end indicates a perforamnce drop of 30-40% on multi-threaded workload (like transcoding)

I hope my limited understanding of things is wrong, but I suspect that the new mini is a bad replacement of the old mini as a pro-sumer server / high-end media box.
 
So, which one would be faster:
  1. my current Mac mini with a 2.4GHz Core 2 Duo and 8GB of RAM
  2. a new Mac mini with a 1.4GHz dual core i5 and 4GB of RAM

:rolleyes:

edit: the Macbook Air page says "4GB of 1600MHz LPDDR3 onboard memory" while the Mac mini page says "4GB of 1600MHz LPDDR3 memory", so I guess it's not soldered on the motherboard.
 
Last edited:
The previous quad core model was too close to the entry Mac Pro in CPU power for dramatically less money. I'm now looking for the previous gen quad core on eBay since it'll be the last respectable mini anytime soon...this makes me so sad. I'd rather them had not update it at all than take it down several notches in power in this way. Argh! ��

I don't think it will be that bad.. The dual core i7 still clocks in at 3.0ghz (3.5 with turbo boost), That and being a newer generation CPU means it should still return decent benchmarks. Perhaps not as good as the higher end models of the previous generation, but likely not so far off either..
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.