uh but what i wanted in a new mac pro is a NEW mac pro...as in not a speed bump but a complete redesign
Maybe that's because the old design was just fine...what is so wrong with it?
And seriously, people don't see this as a big upgrade? Isn't this the latest and greatest chips from intel? Going from 4 to 8 cores on the base machine isn't a big jump? If this machine isn't a good deal, what's the PC equivalent that's better price/performance?
And bluray won't happen until it's the clear winner, if apple shipped a drive that ended up not winning the format war, people would just bitch about that instead. The warner announcment was just days ago, now that that happened, the momentum will FINALLY start going clearly to bluray. Apple will add bluray as an option soon, in the meantime aren't there third party drives that can be added?
One thing I haven't seen mentioned in this thread is that going to all 8 core machines widens the gap between the "consumer" machines...hopefully this bodes well for a midtower.
After all, this machine makes ZERO sense as a gaming machine. Better off with 2-4 cores in a smaller box with graphics card in a slot and maybe one open slot. Announcing this before the show sets the stage perfectly for releasing a midtower next week.
With these machines out, all the whining last month about apple being "late" by not updating to intel's interim chips seem pretty pathetic. How many companies have actually shipped those machines by now? And how many buyers are going to feel stupid for buying them instead of waiting less than a month for an even better chip?