The Republican front runner for 2024 presidential election just met with a white nationalist and antisemite. You don’t really have to try too hard to see which party is “pro white supremacy”.
Give the full information. It was a bill about same sex marriage and interracial marriage. The former was and is the item of contention, not the latter. Your post is biased and misleading.
Thanks for the laugh, better chance they get their podcast taken down.
Every single time too. You'd think with all the horror they claim is going on, they wouldn't have to resort to misleading info.
It takes them 2 seconds to call you a racist, fascist, nazi, etc if you just say you have a different opinion than them on anything. Speaking of liberals in general, not just the person you replied to.
Interracial marriage was voted on a few weeks ago and 37 republicans voted against it. It is not misleading in the slightest.
Was interracial marriage voted on last month or no? It was and 37 republicans voted against it.
Yes it’s misleading. The Respect for Marriage Act included two items: interracial marriage and same sex marriage. By mentioning only interracial marriage you’re implying that that’s what they voted against, which is false since it was an all-or-nothing bill.
Perhaps your problem is that you immediately view everything through a partisan lens. Has it occurred to you that this might be just a well-researched and well-presented podcast? I haven't listened to this season yet, but the ones about Watergate, the origins of the Iraq war and the LA riots were excellent.
There has never been and will never be a bill on protecting school funding and legalizes rape lol so you’re reaching pretty far to make a terrible point.
“I’m offended by your award because I hate your politics”
I’m a conservative. Do you think I’m a white Supremist? I don’t assume that you’re a rioter, looter or Antifa thug. Why do you assume the worst of me?
All of the above doesn’t affect my observation about you leaving out a vital piece. As a matter of fact NPR refers to gay marriage and not interracial marriage in their title.
www.npr.org
Where did he say it makes it ok?Because THAT makes it ok...
He didn’t say that they didn’t vote against interracial marriage. He said that they voted against interracial marriage and same-sex marriage. If I had a bill that would protect interracial marriage and kill 10,000 puppies and you voted against it because of the puppies, would you like it if I started accusing you of voting against interracial marriage? Your vote was entirely dependent on the puppy part of the bill, and by not mentioning that I‘m not being fair to you.
It's a fetus, not a child. Until people stop with the hysterics, false medical information and theatrics to play upon emotions, they are not arguing in good faith. Also, if there's a religious angle (there always is) to a pro-life argument, they've already admitted defeat in any nation where there is a separation of church and state.
I hope it's biased. We listen to and watch documentaries and podcasts for points of view from passionate people, not teleprompter readers. So long as they don't identify as unbiased news (Fox/CNN looking at you) and deliver opinions disguised as news, I don't care how biased they are.
Art contests are all meaningless...except to those involved and audiences of those contests. So pretty much everyone in this forum commenting and beyond.
