Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

MacRumors

macrumors bot
Original poster
Apr 12, 2001
68,532
39,368


Apple has apologized to the developer of an app meant to promote the Indigenous language Sm'algyax after he was falsely accused of dishonest and fraudulent acts, and as a result, had the app removed from the App Store.

appstore.jpg

Brendan Eshom, a member of the Ts'msyen First Nation community, developed and published "Sm'algyax Word" on both Google Play and the App Store this past July. The app serves as a dictionary for phrases and words from Sm'algyaxm archived from FirstVoices.com, and at its core is meant to preserve the language for generations to come.

However, the app was unexpectedly removed from the App Store when it acquired around 600 downloads, pushing it to the top charts in the Education category. Eshom says that he received an automated email from Apple informing him that his developer account would be terminated due to "dishonest and fraudulent" acts that go against Apple's terms and conditions.

Eshom told Global News that it's "definitely concerning when Apple is accusing you of committing fraud" and said that he attempted to reach out to Apple for an explanation for his termination, but his attempts were unsuccessful. The freshmen college student ultimately decided to contact Consumer Matter, a segment from Global News in which companies and corporations are pressed for answers, to try and get Apple to respond to the situation.

Apple responded in a statement to Consumer Matters, explaining that the termination of Eshom's developer account was a mistake and that his app about the Sm'algyax language showcased "how technology can be used to bridge cultural understanding." Apple goes on to apologize to Eshom and promises to improve its processes to ensure it does not happen again.
Maintaining the integrity of the App Store is a responsibility we take seriously to ensure the safety of our customers and give every developer a platform to share their brightest ideas with the world. Unfortunately, this developer's app, which is a great example of how technology can be used to bridge cultural understanding, was mistakenly removed from the App Store.

We regret this error and apologize to Mr. Eshom for the inconvenience this caused him. We have since reinstated his developer account and app, and will continue our efforts to improve our processes to ensure this does not happen again.
Just this week new questions started to circulate following the revelation that scam apps on the App Store continue to enjoy millions in revenue. Apple states that apps that attempt to trick users or engage in "scam practices" will be removed from the App Store, however many still remain.

The contrast between Eshom's case, where a completely innocent app was removed from the App Store, and the case of scam apps roaming rogue on the platform highlights recent concerns that Apple's losing grip with implementing and maintaining an effective moderation policy.

Article Link: Apple Apologizes to Developer After Indigenous Language App Wrongly Removed From App Store
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mike_Trivisonno
Umm why? Mistakes like this happen all the time.
The mistake was automatically removing the app and then also terminating his developer account.

The apology (and advice above to give the guy something) was because after doing this, Apple refused to engage with him at all until some consumer organisation dumped bad publicity on them.
 
The mistake was automatically removing the app and then also terminating his developer account.

The apology (and advice above to give the guy something) was because after doing this, Apple refused to engage with him at all until some consumer organisation dumped bad publicity on them.

And they apologized and gave him access back...? Why is everyone always after free stuff.
 
Having an App Review system that makes no mistake is not possible. But this really should not have happened. He should not have been ignored after the removal of the app. If Apple doesn't take steps to fix the App Store problems soon, they risk losing the right to be the only App Store on iOS, iPadOS, etc.
 
And they apologized and gave him access back...? Why is everyone always after free stuff.
It's how you make people feel better rather than bitter, and in a small way make the company which made the mistake realise there's a financial cost to making them.

it's like giving people a free coffee or dessert in a restaurant when they messed up part of the order. They don't have to, but it's often seen as a win-win. Customer happy, and more likely to come back and hence earn you more profit than you lost in giving away the freebie.

Plus, everyone loves a freebie! Well, I do, so I'm on the side of the freebies.
 
It's how you make people feel better rather than bitter, and in a small way make the company which made the mistake realise there's a financial cost to making them.

it's like giving people a free coffee or dessert in a restaurant when they messed up part of the order. They don't have to, but it's often seen as a win-win. Customer happy, and more likely to come back and hence earn you more profit than you lost in giving away the freebie.

Plus, everyone loves a freebie!

He was still earning on other app stores. A mistake was made, get over it. They apologized and its back.. move on!
 
This is the problem with Apple: they pass judgement with no way for the “defendant” to explain anything or ask for evidence of what they’re alleged to have done wrong. He tried to reach out for more info and they just ignored him. I’m getting very tired of Apple’s behavior with regards to third-party developers who make them a mountain of money.
 
It would be nice to see an explanation as why the account was treated like this. Was it a bad automated action or a bone-headed human decision? Given the attempts by companies to rely on automated decision-making processes as a cost-saving measure, I’d suspect it was flagged automatically and then confirmed by someone overly trusting of an algorithmic decision who had just a few seconds to evaluate the outcome.

It would help then to have a better appeals process that gives a clear path to escalate decisions to someone who can take the time and actually look at it and dispassionately weigh the evidence. Otherwise this may be but one all great example of why delegating to machines leads to bad decisions made by nobody and corrected by nobody without leverage from the media.

As far as those claiming “no harm, no foul”, it is often the best policy to do something more than a belated “sorry” when a company messes up. Note that the developer hasn’t himself asked for any freebies, but others saying it would be nice if Apple were to bear some actual consequence of its policies and recompense the developer for his time and effort expended in fighting Apple’s mistake. It’s not an unreasonable wish because it would demonstrate that Apple realized it was at fault rather than just saying “sorry, these things happen and that’s the way the cookie crumbles but we didn’t really do anything wrong, so be glad we finally did the right thing after you spent eight months to get us to notice the problem.”
 
Last edited:
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.