They only got in touch with him because his public statements got huge attention. They should've just contected him and resolved the issue without him needing to go public. And he's not alone in this, other developers expressed the same frustration.
It's already been done and still is.It’s actually crazy that they ignore any of these. They could be sold and exploited in horrible ways.
People need to stop being so selfish with IT security. I want Spam to stop. I want DDoS to stop. Zombie systems are the cause of these issues.Quote: "Apple CEO Tim Cook said earlier this year that the upcoming rules could "destroy the security" of the iPhone"
Timmy, boy, it's already destroyed, theres no reason not to allow 3rd party app stores, if i want to destroy my iphone security I should be able to, it won't get any worse then it is now.
and maybe, just maybe, apple would invest much more in security if sideloading was allowed?
Trying the only way I know how to get Apple to realize their mistakes, to get Apple to change, and therefore to get Apple to do something (or maybe anything) to keep me from migrating away. It seems that lovefests don't cause change.Hot take! If that’s how you feel, I don’t understand why you are spending time on an Apple rumor web site![]()
I do. Exploits can put a lot of people in danger.
Just wanted to quote this in bold, since it's the sort of thing people keen on criticizing tend to tune out:
I'm not saying Apple did everything right here, but I think this does put things in perspective.
Furthermore the security teams at Google are really good at finding and patching security issues.What you indirectly suggest here is dangerous and a common mistake.
When a person, company or nation benchmarks against a lesser performing competitor and takes comfort and complacency in that as opposed to holding itself to a standard of excellence and continuous improvement (based on what is reasonably doable), decline and adverse events and publicity are possible.
As recent history has shown here.
It's also worth noting that despite you downvoting me, Tokarev themselves has written a blog post saying that the App Store review process will not catch an app using this exploit, and the characterisation in the Macrumours article that he does not think it's a big deal seems... entirely false?
![]()
How malware gets into the App Store and why Apple can't stop that
Only after I had published a post detailing three iOS 0-day vulnerabilities and expressing my frustration with Apple Security Bounty Program, I received a reply from Apple: We saw your blog post...habr.com
Now here is what happens when you submit your app for the App Store review. You can read it in more detail in this and this article but basically, a random reviewer downloads the app onto their iPad, taps through all the screens and makes a decision whether to allow it or not based on their own understanding of the App Store Review Guidelines biased by their own subjective opinions and attitudes.
I do. Exploits can put a lot of people in danger.
Isn‘t it a bit extreme to hold a congress hearing over how a company handles a bug bounty program?
Apple or the Unicode consortium?
Hot take! If that’s how you feel, I don’t understand why you are spending time on an Apple rumor web site![]()
It doesn't help when the world is living thru a pandemic for the past year and a half as well.There is definitely room for improvement in Apple's bug bounty program. That being said other software companies have similar problems with their bug bounty programs as well. I don't envy them trying to triage bugs and making sure things don't get lost in the process.
Someone posted it further upthread. Probably deserves its own article.I’m surprised I haven’t seen a post here about his other accusations against apples privacy and security- https://habr.com/en/post/580272/
Quote: "Apple CEO Tim Cook said earlier this year that the upcoming rules could "destroy the security" of the iPhone"
Timmy, boy, it's already destroyed, theres no reason not to allow 3rd party app stores, if i want to destroy my iphone security I should be able to, it won't get any worse then it is now.
and maybe, just maybe, apple would invest much more in security if sideloading was allowed?
Except mathematical principles disagree with you, and say that allowing sideloading destroys the security of even those who do not sideload anything.
But don’t allow the laws of math, cryptography and information theory to get in the way of an entitled complaint.