I know several Samsung phone users that have AirPods. They have no intention of getting an iPhone, though.I don't get why you'd get Galaxy Buds or AirPods and get the opposing smartphone for it. I mean, it doesn't make a huge difference, but a consistent eco-system is better than a fractured one.
I do not like many Bluetooth earbud designs for a simple reason - the Bluetooth block and battery need to be embedded into the units themselves, making them heavier for the ears and easier to lose. My current personal favourite is these ones - sound good, the battery life is around 8 hours on a charge, splash-friendly and virtually unbreakable. All for a friendly price of 29$!
You have been trained by apple not to understand the freedom of using a headphone on w/e device you want because at the end of the day it's just a headphone. Only apple makes it difficult to play nice with others.
I wonder if you have used the AirPods for more than 5 minutes. For all the complaints of AirPods that may arguably be true, weight is NOT one of them. Especially when you are comparing to the ones in your post. After using AirPods, it seems borderline barbaric to have that wire around the neck and that extra weight on my shoulders. Sure you *could* lose an AirPod - I haven’t...and $29 is not bad. However, the standard AirPods at their discounts to around $129 is, in my opinion, a far greater VALUE than the ones you suggested.
thats the thing you wouldn't.I don't get why you'd get Galaxy Buds or AirPods and get the opposing smartphone for it. I mean, it doesn't make a huge difference, but a consistent eco-system is better than a fractured one.
You have been trained by apple not to understand the freedom of using a headphone on w/e device you want because at the end of the day it's just a headphone. Only apple makes it difficult to play nice with others.
Only apple makes it difficult to play nice with others.
Exactly. They're hoping that you love your Galaxy Buds so much that your next phone will be a Galaxy.
Mostly for the fit, I guess. There are some folks for whom airpods fit just doesn't work. Always good to have alternatives. Wonder whether they will be as seamless as AirPods though. It's not as if other bluetooth devices don't pair with iPhones. But you are correct, if you don't have an issue with the fit, AirPods are the only logical choice. It's not as if these Galaxy Buds are half the price or something.
Only Apple? Clearly you've never tried to watch Prime Video on a Google Nest Hub... To think that all the child's play between companies rests with Apple is naive to say the least.You have been trained by apple not to understand the freedom of using a headphone on w/e device you want because at the end of the day it's just a headphone. Only apple makes it difficult to play nice with others.
The AirPods are part of the ecosystem. If you own a pair you'll see how trivial they are to setup (sit the case on top of the iPhone). There are no other wireless ear plugs or headphones that do this (other than Apple products).I don't get why you'd get Galaxy Buds or AirPods and get the opposing smartphone for it. I mean, it doesn't make a huge difference, but a consistent eco-system is better than a fractured one.
I think you'll find that they just want to sell as many ear-buds as they can?
So what is it then? Sound Quality? there are plenty of earphones that sound as good, is it the touch control'? Again there are plenty that with similar functionality, what is the feature that makes them "fit in the ecosystem?" (Apart from the Apple logo).
The star ratings are impressive.![]()
iphone user here with galaxy buds. galaxy buds were simply the best wireless earbud for me, my airpods collect dust and i returned airpods pro. they are just headphones they dont need "ecosystem" they connect to all my apple devices perfectly and quicklyI don't get why you'd get Galaxy Buds or AirPods and get the opposing smartphone for it. I mean, it doesn't make a huge difference, but a consistent eco-system is better than a fractured one.
Yes, I have used AirPods for more than 5 minutes and my current “borderline barbaric ones” 😉 have several advantages over them. Skullcandy go into the ear canal (like AirPods Pro), but not the AirPods, so the sound isolation and sound quality is better. AirPods (not Pro), on the contrary, is just a wireless EarPods version with the same mediocre sound quality for the price. So as far as the value goes, I am not so sure. For me, Skullcandy are well worth their 29$, but are the AirPods worth their extra 100?
I didn’t mean to sound condescending. And as always, to each their own. Hard to argue with $29.
what I was coming from is that in my experience, there is no comparison to comfort - which weight was the topic brough up about truly wireless earphones And lithium batteries. Not even close to a factor On AirPods..
of all the possible criticisms of AirPods - weight from lithium ion batteries is not even registering. The things weigh nothing.
I used round-the-neck wired “wireless” earphones for years with the in ear canal buds. Working out led to sweaty buds, the wire would get caught on my clothes or skin while running or lifting and pull out a bud, and it was terrible that every time my foot hit the ground while running, the wire would hit my neck and carry sound up to my earphone and create a low thud... thud... thud... as the wire transferred the energy up the wire to the bud. that ruined sound quality.
that’s why - since switching - I feel any wired earphones are “barbaric”.
Weightless, seemless, higher quality sound than EarPods, for $100 more - at least for someone who works out(to me) is a better value - but value is subjective. $29 may be a better deal. -and like I said, it’s hard to argue with that price.
my mind just short circuited at the weight concerns - is all - and which is why I assumed (wrongly) the lack of AirPod use.