You just completely contradicted yourself. You said you've not heard one person complain about the iPhone 6 size. Okay so maybe you've not heard complaints with your ears. But this thread is full of posts and thumbs up from people who would love a smaller phone. Yes, people, not Apple fanatics. People like you and me. Humans. Homo sapiens sapiens. I'm being an ass about driving this point home because I resent being dissed and dismissed.Well it would sell more because the 4 inch version would be cheaper. It's not the fact people want a smaller iPhone it's the fact it would be cheaper.
I've not heard one person complaining about the iPhone 6 size. It seems to be apple fanatics who can't adjust to change who want a 4 inch phone. If it was up to them the iPhone 6 would be 3.8 inches.
I had a 6+. Loved it for awhile, but hard to use when bike riding. I gave it to my stepdaughter and I got her 5S. It was hard to go back to a "tiny" phone, but now it's not tiny anymore. It's perfect.I know SO many people who didn't upgrade from a 5 due to the size increase of the 6... shame.
You just completely contradicted yourself. You said you've not heard one person complain about the iPhone 6 size. Okay so maybe you've not heard complaints with your ears. But this thread is full of posts and thumbs up from people who would love a smaller phone. Yes, people, not Apple fanatics. People like you and me. Humans. Homo sapiens sapiens. I'm being an ass about driving this point home because I resent being dissed and dismissed.
I'm many things, but I'm not an Apple fanatic. I'm only going to be with Apple while they make what I want and provide the level of service I've come to associate with them. It's not a religion I adhere to. We do have a Steve Jobs bobble head figure in the house, but we don't pray to it!The Great Cthulhu would smite us if we did.
And I and at least one other person I saw specifically said we would happily pay full price for a smaller iPhone because it's smaller. We don't want it just because it MIGHT be cheaper, if they ever make one again.
Of course this whole article is fluff. It's an analyst analyzing. None of this comes directly from Apple so all of our rants are against the idea of Apple doing this, not the direct knowledge of what they intend to do.
How about they just offer a 4" iPhone 6S for the same price as the 4.7" iPhone 6S? They could call it the iPhone 6 Minus, lol. I know lots of people, especially women who are staying on iPhone 5 and 5S until Apple makes a 4" iPhone again.
How about they just offer a 4" iPhone 6S for the same price as the 4.7" iPhone 6S? They could call it the iPhone 6 Minus, lol. I know lots of people, especially women who are staying on iPhone 5 and 5S until Apple makes a 4" iPhone again.
I'm sure Apple knows better than me, but, honestly, rather than cannibalizing 6/6+ sale, I think they would have seen more upgrades from folks who prefer 5/5S size and did not upgrade to 6/6+.
My wife has small hands and it took her LG Flip to die and a great promo at Costco to get her to step up to the 5S. I know for a fact that she would never entertain the idea of the 6, much less the 6+.
I doubt Apple would go backwards and make a smaller phone again.
Except there are cases where Apple has done just that. Look at the iPad lineup. I think the entire iPad lineup is about meeting certain price points and maintaining margins. I think the 5C was more about trying to create differentiation within the iPhone product line than wanting to create a phone for low income demographic looking for cheap phones. It was Wall Street and the media that assumed the "C" stood for cheap. And I also think there was an element of trying to keep a cheaper 5 from cannibalizing the 5S. That's why I'm still a bit skeptical that Apple will keep both the 6 and 6 Plus but just discount them $100.
So, why not just release a 4" 6C with the same internals as the 6 and sell it alongside the 6 at the exact same price as the 6? Would that still be considered cannibalizing if they cost the same? I am sure there's added cost on their part to offer two products, but might not two products capture more total audience?
Why does the C model have to be a budget phone? Apple doesn't need to sell a budget phone. I personally don't want to buy a budget phone. But I do prefer a 4" (or even 3.5") screen. And I happen to be pretty attached to the color options like my 5C.
I know SO many people who didn't upgrade from a 5 due to the size increase of the 6... shame.
There is no way the iPhone Plus models are leaving. That phone brought back too many smart phone users.The fate of the 6 Plus is intriguing.
If history is anything to go on, the 5C gets discontinued, the 5S becomes "Free" and the iPhone 6 and 6 Plus get price cuts.
Whether the iPhone 6 Plus will disappear completely is interesting. I'm leaning towards it staying.
Agreed. The iPhone 6 plus was the first iPhone in a while that I actually use as my primary phone. I've been using android devices for the past 3 years. Most of my friends who were using Galaxy note phones now have iPhone 6 plus.There is no way the iPhone Plus models are leaving. That phone brought back too many smart phone users.
Same. My partner recently bought an iPhone 5S over a 6 because it's just too big for her small hands. I'm 6' and even with my humongous piano playing fingers I find the iPhone 6 to be a little too big for one handed use. Works out better for her since the 5S is cheaper!I don't get why they would scrap it... I know plenty of people who got the 6, but would have preferred the 4" screen of the 5s because their hands are small...
No. That old argument was made by idiots on Wall Street years ago. Since then, Apple has increased in value by several hundred percent.Chinese market blowing up. Apple needs something cheaper.
Perhaps what people thought was a 4" iPhone was really just the iPod touch. In one of Ming-Chi Kuo's reports he referenced a pink iPhone. Perhaps that was really the pink iPod touch.