Sign In from your real id, Master Tim.I disagree with much of your feedback.
Sign In from your real id, Master Tim.I disagree with much of your feedback.
That’s never happening.I don't want macOS on Vision Pro, but I need functionality on par with it. The fact I can't code apps on it that's tuned for visionOS makes it unmatchable as an actual computer for me.
Having it be based off iOS makes it mediocre. Hopefully it starts to diverge from it fast. People justify it by saying its first gen, but WE STILL DON'T EVEN HAVE MULTIPLE AUDIO STREAMS ON IOS, LET ALONE IPADOS THAT HAS MULTI LAYERING OF WINDOWS.
1. That's just speculation and if its true, the shareholders are holding back Apple from truly innovating next gen products. It hasn't released a new smash hit product line since Apple Watch in April 2015.1 Without TIm, apple will fall in shareholders eyes=> Apple will underdeliver
2 Jony Ive without Steve made the worse possible devices, like butterfly keyboard and hot hot macbooks with Intel, with worse iphones battery life
3 Craig is better where he is, wee need him there
4 Apple car revive, maybe it wasnt even a thing in the first place
5 Agree if its true
6 It needs QA and the customers its the best QA so no
7 Agree
8 Agree but only if they made the entry level better
9 Maybe, because that will place EU as a powerhouse on everything, and EU should not have the monopoly over the world
10 Agree
Or AI…oops forgot they missed the boat on AICan't Apple's own analytics data answer most of these questions?
Exactly that’s what I’ve been saying about the AVP it’s not worth it as we as humans don’t want things on our head or face that’s not actually needed.They probably want to know why they've stopped using it. Probably for the same reason I stopped using my Meta Quest: It's uncomfortable to wear. Once you get over the hype, it's not that useful.
We aren't in a recession. People have wanted us to be in one for years, but we aren't in one.Here’s some feedback Apple, we are in a recession, most people don’t have disposable income to buy groceries or gas much less to spend $4k on a VR headset. Make a much less expensive mainstream version or deal with the 1% of consumers who would buy this and .0001% of the 1% who don’t realize after they bought it that it’s a giant waste of money.
The ones buying the VR headsets are not those with no disposable income …
O, how I abhor this image; smug, dystopian, beige… Black Mirror looking dentist office. Horrific.
Did you see the MRI of the Vision Pro? How long do you think it will take to cram all that tech into the rims of a pair of glasses; LIDAR, multiple cameras (even if you don't need passthrough anymore you still have to detect hand movements), LED projectors and recievers for eye tracking, CPU, ram and that's before you get to the battery. I hear this argument all the time but I don't think any one understands this is a distant dream.Until this tech gets to a point it's just like wearing glasses the practicality is just a deal breaker for me. The early adopters can help get it there I guess. But I personally don't see myself desiring this thing at all. Especially at that price point.
They didn’t need to send such surveys when Jobs was around.