I don’t think too many developers see much money or use cases to justify spending time on building apps for the watch. In fact many of my former apps have stopped support for Apple Watch.
I don’t think too many developers see much money or use cases to justify spending time on building apps for the watch. In fact many of my former apps have stopped support for Apple Watch.
I was eagerly awaiting porting one of my iOS apps to a stand alone Apple watch app back in 2015 when the first Apple watch was released. Then I found out it didn't support stand alone apps, so customers would have to buy the iOS version, then somehow buy a Watch version via the in-app purchase mechanism on the iPhone. Managing that would have sucked.
I also felt it was BS to force the customer to buy the iOS version if they only wanted the watch version - so here's an example of an honest developer (me) not wanting to screw customers.
Apple changing their position on this is a sure sign that the Apple Watch is not doing well. "Compromise" is only a term Apple only understands when they become desperate.
[doublepost=1568264134][/doublepost]
Exactly, there's no money in supporting Apple watch.
Isn't Apple Watch itself doing well? It's a huge driver for their earnings as of late.
I think the Apps though are doing terribly as you confirmed.
Paving the way for the Apple Watch to be a totally untethered device.
I’m planning on getting a 3G series 5 and going sans phone until they release an SE size replacement (maybe / probably never)
Paving the way for the Apple Watch to be a totally untethered device.
I’m planning on getting a 3G series 5 and going sans phone until they release an SE size replacement (maybe / probably never)
I install apps for their complications. If I actually want to do anything, I grab my phone. I find the App Store on the watch to be pretty humorous: A store interface on a postage-stamp sized display selling postage-stamp sized apps. Discovery seems like it will be quite a challenge.
The iPhone was a success only because Apple was reasonable to developers in 2008 because Apple NEEDED developers to help (re)define the "Smartphone" by creating apps for it. Apple in their arrogance left developers out of the process of defining the Smartwatch by forcing idiotic App Store policies on Developers.
Despite what Apple says, the Watch is not doing well, at least not when compared to how the iPhone redefined the cell phone.
Agreed! I am really looking forward to the day when we can use an Apple Watch without owning an iPhone.
Apple changing their position on this is a sure sign that the Apple Watch is not doing well.
yes i know but they will only be selling the 3 and 5 so its kinda weirdGen 4 will be supported longer than gen 3.
3G? The Series 3 and 4 have both used LTE, so I’d assume the 5 would as well.Paving the way for the Apple Watch to be a totally untethered device.
I’m planning on getting a 3G series 5 and going sans phone until they release an SE size replacement (maybe / probably never)
The Strava app seems to be a minimum viable product from when the Series 2 launched that they have hardly touched since then. I am really hoping they finally put some effort into the watch app.I barely use watch apps. Strava is an exception and it is pretty weak.
3G? The Series 3 and 4 have both used LTE, so I’d assume the 5 would as well.
I'm not sure about that, but my old "Get Running" app with its Couch to 5k mode would use the phone's GPS to track your run, telling you when along your journey you were to run, walk, and where the halfway point was.Isnt the model for C25K actually a time based program?