Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
No one has said this yet but this is obviously for the Verizon customers because on AT&T you can use talk and data at the same time.
 
Really? I've got a Lumia 920, I can put someone on hold and send whatever to them (or anyone else for that matter) by MMS. Thinking about it, I'm fairly sure my old N95 could do it too... There's absolutely no innovative step here so far as I can see...

Leaving the phone app to send an e-mail or anything else isn't what this patent is for. Surf and talk is there but this is more specific to having a visual menu of items to share with the person you've put on hold. It's different.


No one has said this yet but this is obviously for the Verizon customers because on AT&T you can use talk and data at the same time.
Seems you know little about VZW because the iPhone is one phone you cannot surf and talk at the same time but the Nexus can. I was surprised when I found out that my neighbor can surf and talk while on VZW using his phone.

Not what the patent is for.

Ah seems you beat me too it. :eek:
 
You said "Software patents simply don't work." Please give a good example that is representative of how software patents don't work for the majority of patent owners?

I agree that the rate of software innovation is changing things, and so the patent office needs to evaluate how to adapt. But that's a separate matter from "they don't work. Let's get rid of em. (paraphrasing)"

The situation isn't as dire as you or many suggest. The sky isn't falling.

"And what was especially galling to Jeff? When he called them to ask, “What am I stealing from you guys?” they wouldn’t tell him.

Kelling: That was a question they wouldn’t answer. They said they wouldn’t answer that until we got into court. So they wouldn’t even identify what parts of our business or what they thought we were doing to use... to use their technology.

But to go to court, to answer that question, was gonna cost money. A lot of money.

Kelling: It was between two and five million dollars and that’s more than our company could handle, honestly. We knew we had to settle this thing somehow. There would be no more FotoTime today if we had to do that.

[...]

As far as we can tell, and not a lot of this information is public, most of the companies being sued ended up doing what Jeff did and agreed to pay FotoMedia money. Some of them were put out of business."

http://www.thisamericanlife.org/radio-archives/episode/441/when-patents-attack
 
For those of you who complain, asking "Why do patents exist?," the answer can be summarized in one word: motivation. We're barely motivated to get out of a warm, comfortable bed to face the cold morning commute to work. How motivated would you be to spend many years of risk and heart-ache to create a product some other company with 1000x more resources can copy in a day?

Entrepreneurship is the pursuit of dreams and money. You'd lose both in a second without protection, and even then nothing is 100% safe. It sucks that things become systemic, get abused, and in the end partially a game. But let us not forget our human nature.

We need to improve the patent system, not get rid of it.

while that part is true. Problem is you have patent trolls and companies like APple shoving threw crappent like this.
Under Jobs Apple was more like a patent troll suing with their crapents like slid to unlock and other that are crap. Cook seems more willing to just leave the crapents in the files to defend agaist trolls but never use them as a weapon.
 
You know what else works? Not having a cell phone or smart phone. Having patience to go home and use a landline. Or a map instead of GPS. A library instead of Wikipedia. What's wrong with progress and new features? Are you anti-technology?



You should consider that I was being sarcastic. I am definitely not anti-technology. That would be absurd.

----------

Not what the patent is for.

And actually - even if implemented - this feature wouldn't work on Verizon unless it worked via both parties also being on wifi and went though Apple's servers like iMessage.
 
Assuming I can't wait for that fascinating slideshow you want to send me, why would I want to get it in silence and look at it after the call? This could be useful if it was like that thing Samsung touts--doing two things at once. I could play some pics (or, *gasp* work-related docs) simultaneously while narrating/having a conversation.
Oh, right, Skype.
 
If you're calling your local community service organization to find out the date and time of the next Lesbian Rap Group meeting or Christian Singles mixer, and the agent has to put you on hold./QUOTE]

If this is the case, the agent should have a landline and a computer...
 
Nice...seems like you could create your own personal hold entertainment.

Yes! Something the average person absolutely needs access to: hold music. :roll eyes:
"Are you mad that we've left you on hold for 4 minutes? Enjoy this slideshow of blurry pics from my night in Caracas!"
 
Leaving the phone app to send an e-mail or anything else isn't what this patent is for. Surf and talk is there but this is more specific to having a visual menu of items to share with the person you've put on hold. It's different.

They should show the "visit our website and don't bother with people who leave you on hold" option.
 
There are these guys in the Samsung adverts, but I wouldn't know their names. Very likely someone in the Samsung test department as well, at least I'd hope so. So you really can't say truthfully that _nobody_ uses these features. :D

my co-workers have definitely used this feature to share pics of company events/dinners
 
Not if you're on Verizon. Can't do simultaneous data/voice.

Question about this. Verizon 4g can do simultaneous voice data on android and I understand the iPhone 5 can't even though it's 4g. That doesn't mean it won't ever though, right. Just trying to understand if it's a limitation of the iPhone that can't be fixed in furore versions of the phone.
 
Yes! Something the average person absolutely needs access to: hold music. :roll eyes:
"Are you mad that we've left you on hold for 4 minutes? Enjoy this slideshow of blurry pics from my night in Caracas!"

Your right....only corps should have that.

There couldn't possibly be any OTHER use for feature...

/sarcasm
 
while that part is true. Problem is you have patent trolls and companies like APple shoving threw crappent like this.
Under Jobs Apple was more like a patent troll suing with their crapents like slid to unlock and other that are crap. Cook seems more willing to just leave the crapents in the files to defend agaist trolls but never use them as a weapon.

That's a valid take on it. But look at it this way: Apple and AT&T
partnered to release the iPhone and transform the phone industry, bringing us a new take on portable computing. This made Apple and AT&T a dominant force, and a lot of money. Verizon panicked, partnered with Samsung, and there is court ordered evidence that Samsung and Verizon scrambled to compete, understandably. The problem is this: to rush to the market you tend to copy and not take the time to create in an original capacity. Apple worked on the iPad and iPhone for 10+ years. Google saw that and released Android quick. Samsung saw that and released their products quick. It's like finding out you owe a 12 page paper tomorrow. What are you going to do, go through a research phase, multiple draft phases, seek an editor and perfect your original paper? No, you're going to look at Wikipedia and paraphrase what you read, and make it seem like you went through that process. That's what Apple has to deal with when they're a market leader. So for survival, they have to play the patent game as best they can. It's the nature of markets and business and life. You have to play to natures game. It sucks, but were you in Apples shoes you could not hope for a smarter strategy.

Unfortunately it didn't pan out, and even if Samsung owes money they made billions in the interim while the court cases play themselves out. No matter what Samsung and Verizon are rewarded for playing catch up. It's like getting a $100 speeding ticket in a rush to pick up a $1000 lottery ticket before the store closes. You calculate the expense and still decide the fine is worth it.

But that's a separate topic of debate.

----------

while that part is true. Problem is you have patent trolls and companies like APple shoving threw crappent like this.
Under Jobs Apple was more like a patent troll suing with their crapents like slid to unlock and other that are crap. Cook seems more willing to just leave the crapents in the files to defend agaist trolls but never use them as a weapon.

PS: To invent the apple pie you have to invent the universe first.
Who created slide-to-unlock and what had to be created before it to implement slide-to-unlock?

My point is that Apple and all companies patent these features as iterative of a larger invention. You just cover your ass, is what you do. It took a lot of capital investment to climb the technology to where slide to unlock exists.
 
That's a valid take on it. But look at it this way: Apple and AT&T
partnered to release the iPhone and transform the phone industry, bringing us a new take on portable computing. This made Apple and AT&T a dominant force, and a lot of money. Verizon panicked, partnered with Samsung, and there is court ordered evidence that Samsung and Verizon scrambled to compete, understandably. The problem is this: to rush to the market you tend to copy and not take the time to create in an original capacity. Apple worked on the iPad and iPhone for 10+ years. Google saw that and released Android quick. Samsung saw that and released their products quick. It's like finding out you owe a 12 page paper tomorrow. What are you going to do, go through a research phase, multiple draft phases, seek an editor and perfect your original paper? No, you're going to look at Wikipedia and paraphrase what you read, and make it seem like you went through that process. That's what Apple has to deal with when they're a market leader. So for survival, they have to play the patent game as best they can. It's the nature of markets and business and life. You have to play to natures game. It sucks, but were you in Apples shoes you could not hope for a smarter strategy.

Unfortunately it didn't pan out, and even if Samsung owes money they made billions in the interim while the court cases play themselves out. No matter what Samsung and Verizon are rewarded for playing catch up. It's like getting a $100 speeding ticket in a rush to pick up a $1000 lottery ticket before the store closes. You calculate the expense and still decide the fine is worth it.

But that's a separate topic of debate.

----------



PS: To invent the apple pie you have to invent the universe first.
Who created slide-to-unlock and what had to be created before it to implement slide-to-unlock?

My point is that Apple and all companies patent these features as iterative of a larger invention. You just cover your ass, is what you do. It took a lot of capital investment to climb the technology to where slide to unlock exists.

Just so much miss information in there I am not even sure what to start.

My suggestion to you is get off the Apple Koolaid.

Example of slide to Unlock. MS had that one one of their phones YEARS before the iphone came out.
Android had touch screen out before the iPhone, Apples basic look looks a lot like a samsung device release a little before the iPhone and the LG prada.

That just goes to show you a lot of people had the same idea. Multitouch had been around for over 10 years before the iPhone, App store was not an Apple idea.
Android was built and able to go tablet with very little work. The iPad for the most part is a big iPod touch.....
 
I like the idea, they had the networks in minds when they came up with this:rolleyes:

more money for the network providers and more iPhone promotion by the network. :D
 
Why is this "patent" awarded?

The USPTO is basically a joke nowadays, filled with little nerds who couldn't get a high paying job out of school, so they try to curry favors by approving such nonsense in the hope that after a few of these approvals they can make the jump to a corporation like Apple.

And yes, "patents" like this (many would actually fail in court) are stifling innovation and Apple has become one of the worst patent trolls.

Actually it's the patent system "outrage" this is pretty much a joke.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.