No one has said this yet but this is obviously for the Verizon customers because on AT&T you can use talk and data at the same time.
No one has said this yet but this is obviously for the Verizon customers because on AT&T you can use talk and data at the same time.
Really? I've got a Lumia 920, I can put someone on hold and send whatever to them (or anyone else for that matter) by MMS. Thinking about it, I'm fairly sure my old N95 could do it too... There's absolutely no innovative step here so far as I can see...
Seems you know little about VZW because the iPhone is one phone you cannot surf and talk at the same time but the Nexus can. I was surprised when I found out that my neighbor can surf and talk while on VZW using his phone.No one has said this yet but this is obviously for the Verizon customers because on AT&T you can use talk and data at the same time.
Not what the patent is for.
You said "Software patents simply don't work." Please give a good example that is representative of how software patents don't work for the majority of patent owners?
I agree that the rate of software innovation is changing things, and so the patent office needs to evaluate how to adapt. But that's a separate matter from "they don't work. Let's get rid of em. (paraphrasing)"
The situation isn't as dire as you or many suggest. The sky isn't falling.
For those of you who complain, asking "Why do patents exist?," the answer can be summarized in one word: motivation. We're barely motivated to get out of a warm, comfortable bed to face the cold morning commute to work. How motivated would you be to spend many years of risk and heart-ache to create a product some other company with 1000x more resources can copy in a day?
Entrepreneurship is the pursuit of dreams and money. You'd lose both in a second without protection, and even then nothing is 100% safe. It sucks that things become systemic, get abused, and in the end partially a game. But let us not forget our human nature.
We need to improve the patent system, not get rid of it.
You know what else works? Not having a cell phone or smart phone. Having patience to go home and use a landline. Or a map instead of GPS. A library instead of Wikipedia. What's wrong with progress and new features? Are you anti-technology?
Not what the patent is for.
Nice...seems like you could create your own personal hold entertainment.
Wonder if you can share music?
Knowing Apple, it'll be iOS 7.1![]()
If you're calling your local community service organization to find out the date and time of the next Lesbian Rap Group meeting or Christian Singles mixer, and the agent has to put you on hold./QUOTE]
If this is the case, the agent should have a landline and a computer...
Nice...seems like you could create your own personal hold entertainment.
Been able to do this for years on my Android phones.
Leaving the phone app to send an e-mail or anything else isn't what this patent is for. Surf and talk is there but this is more specific to having a visual menu of items to share with the person you've put on hold. It's different.
There are these guys in the Samsung adverts, but I wouldn't know their names. Very likely someone in the Samsung test department as well, at least I'd hope so. So you really can't say truthfully that _nobody_ uses these features.![]()
Also I've heard that iMessage, WhatsApp, Email and other such apps can send pictures, video, audio, etc while you're not only on hold - but during the call as well. AMAZING!
Not if you're on Verizon. Can't do simultaneous data/voice.
Yes! Something the average person absolutely needs access to: hold music. :roll eyes:
"Are you mad that we've left you on hold for 4 minutes? Enjoy this slideshow of blurry pics from my night in Caracas!"
while that part is true. Problem is you have patent trolls and companies like APple shoving threw crappent like this.
Under Jobs Apple was more like a patent troll suing with their crapents like slid to unlock and other that are crap. Cook seems more willing to just leave the crapents in the files to defend agaist trolls but never use them as a weapon.
while that part is true. Problem is you have patent trolls and companies like APple shoving threw crappent like this.
Under Jobs Apple was more like a patent troll suing with their crapents like slid to unlock and other that are crap. Cook seems more willing to just leave the crapents in the files to defend agaist trolls but never use them as a weapon.
That's a valid take on it. But look at it this way: Apple and AT&T
partnered to release the iPhone and transform the phone industry, bringing us a new take on portable computing. This made Apple and AT&T a dominant force, and a lot of money. Verizon panicked, partnered with Samsung, and there is court ordered evidence that Samsung and Verizon scrambled to compete, understandably. The problem is this: to rush to the market you tend to copy and not take the time to create in an original capacity. Apple worked on the iPad and iPhone for 10+ years. Google saw that and released Android quick. Samsung saw that and released their products quick. It's like finding out you owe a 12 page paper tomorrow. What are you going to do, go through a research phase, multiple draft phases, seek an editor and perfect your original paper? No, you're going to look at Wikipedia and paraphrase what you read, and make it seem like you went through that process. That's what Apple has to deal with when they're a market leader. So for survival, they have to play the patent game as best they can. It's the nature of markets and business and life. You have to play to natures game. It sucks, but were you in Apples shoes you could not hope for a smarter strategy.
Unfortunately it didn't pan out, and even if Samsung owes money they made billions in the interim while the court cases play themselves out. No matter what Samsung and Verizon are rewarded for playing catch up. It's like getting a $100 speeding ticket in a rush to pick up a $1000 lottery ticket before the store closes. You calculate the expense and still decide the fine is worth it.
But that's a separate topic of debate.
----------
PS: To invent the apple pie you have to invent the universe first.
Who created slide-to-unlock and what had to be created before it to implement slide-to-unlock?
My point is that Apple and all companies patent these features as iterative of a larger invention. You just cover your ass, is what you do. It took a lot of capital investment to climb the technology to where slide to unlock exists.
If you consider 150k to be a low paying job then I can't save you from ignorance.
How about you give me the legal reasoning as to why this should not be patentable?....
Oh my god, patents are the most stupid thing on earth. I don't know how you can breath easily in US - there is no patent for TAKING A BREATH? You're not paying, so you can't use that feature...
Why is this "patent" awarded?
The USPTO is basically a joke nowadays, filled with little nerds who couldn't get a high paying job out of school, so they try to curry favors by approving such nonsense in the hope that after a few of these approvals they can make the jump to a corporation like Apple.
And yes, "patents" like this (many would actually fail in court) are stifling innovation and Apple has become one of the worst patent trolls.