Not to be offensive, but what in the HELL does this woman need with an iPad? Am I missing something? This report makes it sound like she was denied the purchase of some essential house-hold product.. not an arguably luxury product.
Right. Insert just about anything in this phrase: "Not to be (blank)." Seriously? One short look at her home from a local newscast makes you believe she does not need an iPad? Listen to yourself: it's her cash, her decision. The point of the story is that Apple's policy reversal was hinged on this woman's experience. End of story.
Let me spell it out: according to some of you, an older black woman in an urban neighborhood, on a fixed income and without access to a credit card, must obviously be on the dole and how dare she save for an iPad?
Yes, you are missing a lot: she needs an iPad: and it's none of your business why; or, how she pays for it, or how YOU think she should spend her own damn money.
What the hell is wrong with you people?