Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
FWIW, in the biomedical industry, this is a BFD. Our analytical equipment costs anywhere from $20k-$2M and requires constant preventative maintenance and service. The manufacturers limit access to replacement parts and require customers to maintain service contracts with them. Third-party service providers are left in the cold, and customers are stuck with annual contracts costing 10-20% of the devices' original price every year. These costs impact everything from diagnostic testing and imaging to drug discovery and development.
 
I was a Mac Genius for 7 years. Fact is, if you're not regularly repairing these devices daily and fully know their tolerances/peculiarities (and each phone has little tricks and "gotchas" as time goes on you learn them), most common folks don't have the dexterity, finesse, patience and nimble fingers to handle most component-level iPhone repairs. There's all sorts of annoying glue and fasteners that are unfamiliar to most people, ZIF/LIF connectors, non-magnetized screws, heat shields and display calibrations that need to be done.

Mac notebooks were tight quarters enough, iPhones are another magnitude beyond it.

The catch is Apple will see a ham-fisted repair, and charge out-of-warranty prices to remedy the damage or deny service entirely.

If you don't know what GSX and a spudger is... this is a trap.
Having tried to service my own Switch joycons, I no longer trust myself with any ZIF connector.
 
It's really useless since so many components are serialized, and require apple genuine parts and their proprietary service to re-authorize components - even if they are genuine apple but used parts harvested from broken phones.
Is there any *good* reason for that?
 
It's really useless since so many components are serialized, and require apple genuine parts and their proprietary service to re-authorize components - even if they are genuine apple but used parts harvested from broken phones.

It’s really useless as long as it doesn’t compel manufacturers to stop sealing the devices with all kinds of glue and soldering the internal components. Those are the two things that make repairing extremely difficult. Not to mention the steps they’ve taken to ensure genuine components are used.
 
FWIW, in the biomedical industry, this is a BFD. Our analytical equipment costs anywhere from $20k-$2M and requires constant preventative maintenance and service. The manufacturers limit access to replacement parts and require customers to maintain service contracts with them. Third-party service providers are left in the cold, and customers are stuck with annual contracts costing 10-20% of the devices' original price every year. These costs impact everything from diagnostic testing and imaging to drug discovery and development.
15% is pretty typical for a service contract. It's what we paid for computer service back in the day too, and pretty much aligned with service on all big-ticket low volume items. Some come with service guarantees, e.g. 99.999% uptime but charge extra for that.

I anticipate the bill with result in more service choices, but not lower costs.
 
That could be a good thing, depending on perspective. Personally, I’d deal with the hassle of serial verification as long as the parts are genuine. There’s no way I’m taking a ~$1000 phone to a mall kiosk or no-name repair center.
Well, the $1000 phone is not $1000 4-5 years down the line, and will sometimes change hands several times over.

This over protection and serialization stops them from being repaired down the line even after Apple refuses to repair them when marked as vintage or obsolete.

Same goes for the M1 macbooks, like why does the screen angle sensor needs to be serialized?
 
Last edited:
244 requires that Apple and other companies provide components, repair manuals, and other repair information to be available for seven years after the sale of any product that costs more than $99.99.
Great, let's see the battery replacement toolkit for AirPods. They cost more than $99.99.

Or does this bill not actually do anything?
 
Great, let's see the battery replacement toolkit for AirPods. They cost more than $99.99.

Or does this bill not actually do anything?

No, it locks in the status quo while making it harder for non-authorized repair shops, beyond those doing Apple repairs, from competing on price. It applies to electronic products, does an EV qualify? That would really mess up Tesla.
 
I was a Mac Genius for 7 years. Fact is, if you're not regularly repairing these devices daily and fully know their tolerances/peculiarities
The independent repair shops that customers would like to bring their iPhones to because they want an alternative to Apple's flat rate repair prices, those repair shops that right to repair is meant to allow getting their hands on original Apple parts, the technicians working there don't regularly repair these devices?

I really can't believe that you posted this in good faith when it even says in the article itself:

California's law does ensure that customers have options other than the Apple Store.

We both know the average consumer doesn't order iPhone parts to do repairs themselves, it's about manufacturers locking down their products to the point where consumers are forced to go through manufacturer-approved repair processes and pay those prices.
 
  • Like
Reactions: lartola
No, it locks in the status quo while making it harder for non-authorized repair shops, beyond those doing Apple repairs, from competing on price. It applies to electronic products, does an EV qualify? That would really mess up Tesla.
If it doesn't force companies to design more reparable products rather than disposable products like AirPods, "right to repair" doesn't even deserve to be in the same sentence. California is a weird mix of faux progressivism and corporatocracy which this bill is a perfect example of. Still better than most of the states if we ignore the insane cost of living.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: lartola
I was a Mac Genius for 7 years. Fact is, if you're not regularly repairing these devices daily and fully know their tolerances/peculiarities (and each phone has little tricks and "gotchas" as time goes on you learn them), most common folks don't have the dexterity, finesse, patience and nimble fingers to handle most component-level iPhone repairs. There's all sorts of annoying glue and fasteners that are unfamiliar to most people, ZIF/LIF connectors, non-magnetized screws, heat shields and display calibrations that need to be done.

Mac notebooks were tight quarters enough, iPhones are another magnitude beyond it.

The catch is Apple will see a ham-fisted repair, and charge out-of-warranty prices to remedy the damage or deny service entirely.

If you don't know what GSX and a spudger is... this is a trap.
Nah, for the average consumer, this is about being able to go to either a 3rd party repairer, or Apple themselves, for a repair, instead of having to simply buy an entire new machine because a single component blew out, and the parts are proprietary, and aren't available for sale, and it isn't worth the cost of replacing the entire motherboard, including soldered in chip, RAM, and SSD.

No one is looking at this and seriously thinking of jumping into micro soldering on their shiny new MBP.
 
  • Like
Reactions: okkibs and lartola
Electronics have become more and more densely, all integrated into one or a couple of custom build chip packages. Repairing that is not as easy as computers +25 years ago.



You could, if you have the tools, skill and money for the spare parts set.
Or access to a 3rd party repairer who does this sort of stuff for a living.
 
  • Like
Reactions: okkibs
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.