I hate it when social conventions become verbs. I facebook, You facebook, He/She/It facebooks.
Consider it the user's way of acknowledging his or her own shortcomings.
"I facebook" = "I provide information about myself on the Internet, but I rely on the lackadaisical privacy policy of a third party to override social conventions about information I distribute to or expect from others."
"I google" = "I search on the Internet from only one place, because I'm unaware of meta-search tools or domain specific search tools that are more likely to get me what I want. I measure reliability according as ordering of Google search results."
"I podcast" = "I make a video/audio stream available on demand while displaying an ignorance of or affinity for Apple's lawyer strongarming (over use of the three letters `pod'). This all reflects my lack of recognition of the history of Internet streaming media and of the open principles of the Internet in general."
"I blog" = "I write an online journal, then inflate its importance out of all proportion and make sure to use this broadcast medium - rather than thoughtful one-to-one conversation - as a channel for communicating with those whom I still dare to call friends."
The only relief is that "to Web 2.0" isn't yet a verb. I hate web apps, whether that's MobileMe's complex interface or this bulletin board (that doesn't mean I hate you or the board's content, dear sensitive reader, just the app). Use a suitable protocol for communicating the content and let people use dedicated clients suitable for the given application - so I can read all web boards in the same client, etc. The whole "but then you can use it everywhere" argument is nonsense - if Java/.net weren't such good ideas so awfully implemented then it'd be accepted practice to be able to run your set of efficient sandboxed apps anywhere by accessing your profile from any PC anywhere.
Here endeth my sermon on how the Internet should be. Tongue-in-cheek, don't kill me, etc.