Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

MacRumors

macrumors bot
Original poster
Apr 12, 2001
68,574
39,430


Apple and Google have blocked an update to England and Wales' contact tracing app that included a feature that would have collected user location data, breaking the companies' terms and conditions for contact tracing apps, the BBC reports.

Exposure-Notifications-W-People-and-Text.jpg

Last year, Apple and Google partnered up to announce a COVID-19 contact tracing API that allows apps to track whether someone has been in contact with an individual who has tested positive for COVID-19.

When visiting a shop, restaurant or other public venue, users of the NHS COVID-19 app can scan a QR code to indicate that they've been at that location. Using the API, the NHS app checks a database to look for a match, and can inform the user if they need to self-quarantine and/or get tested if someone at the same location recorded a positive COVID-19 test result that was flagged by other means.

The U.K.'s National Health Service in England and Wales had planned to release an update to its app that would have asked COVID-19 positive users to upload a log of their QR code check-ins. However, according to the terms and conditions which govern Apple and Google's contact tracing API, any app that uses the API cannot collect user location data.

As a result, both companies have refused to make the update available for download on their respective app distribution platforms. The previous version of the NHS app, however, remains available for download.
The plan had been to ask users to upload logs of venue check-ins - carried out via poster barcode scans - if they tested positive for the virus. This could be used to warn others.

But the two firms had explicitly banned such a function from the start.

Under the terms that all health authorities signed up to use Apple and Google's privacy-centric contact-tracing tech, they had to agree not to collect any location data via the software.

As a result, Apple and Google refused to make the update available for download from their app stores last week and have instead kept the old version live.
As the BBC notes, the NHS app has always included the ability for users to scan a QR code when visiting a public establishment. However, the code was only used to check a database that had been generated by local authorities following a viral outbreak.

The now rejected update would have changed that, by asking users who had tested positive to upload their QR code checks-in to the cloud. A spokesperson for the Department of Health told the BBC that "The deployment of the functionality of the NHS Covid-19 app to enable users to upload their venue history has been delayed."

Article Link: Apple Blocks Update to UK NHS Contact Tracing App for Breaking Location Data Collection Rules
 
Last edited:
It's optional they said. It's not spying on you,they said. It's not a police state they said. And now, it's forced and you are oppressed under threat of arrest and persecution by the state.

And the big "charities" Amnesty International, "civil liberties" outfits, etc. not a single peep from any of them. These so-called rights organizations are nothing more than disingenuous, political special interest groups that when push comes to shove "just follow orders" especially if regular people are oppressed instead of some trendy new scam they're running.
 
They can use a separate system/app like we have in Scotland for checking in (In addition to the NHS Scotland App):

 
But I don’t understand.

I have been assured by others that the app is secretly telling everyone exactly where I am at all times.

This report would seem to suggest that a buzzer doesn’t in fact go off in Boris Johnson’s office every time I nip to Sainsbury’s. That can’t be right surely. How else can big brother keep an eye on my movements?
 
The team behind this app are a disaster. First it was months late and now this! Surely someone had the brains to think of this. Millions of ££ wasted on something that other countries out together in a month. Disgraceful waste of tax payers money really. Wonder if the devs owned a bar before and are mates with Hancock.
 
This makes a strong argument both for and against the walled garden. It’s amazing that Apple can block an app update like this, and I am sure it must also infuriate the government that their app can be blocked by Apple like this, and there is no way for them to circumvent this.
 
“Privacy” is something that UK politicians just don’t understand. And what they understand even less is that Apple and Google could both just say “No” to them.

In this case, the project is run by Dido Harding, known best for almost destroying Talk Talk when they gave hackers access to their customer database and couldn’t see anything wrong with that. So this is not unexpected.
 
Protecting health and saving lives is more important than blindly enforcing the rules. Apple & Google need to be more flexible.
This is just ridiculously stupid. We can protect health and save lives by making people _use_ this app. And we make them use it by giving strong guarantees that their privacy is protected. If that update went through I’d instantly delete the app from my phone and tell all friends and relatives to do the same. Lives and health would be much better protected by firing Dido Harding instantly.
 
A contact tracing app can either honour privacy or be effective. Pick one. Contact tracing is against privacy.

Apple's and Google's approach is good from the privacy perspective. Some Asian countries have used quite effective contact tracing apps, but they are quite 1984ish.
False. The Apple/Google API allowed contact tracing while respecting privacy, that was the whole point. It could alert you if you’d been exposed without needing to track your location. Next time do basic research before you embarrass yourself.
 
The team behind this app are a disaster. First it was months late and now this! Surely someone had the brains to think of this. Millions of ££ wasted on something that other countries out together in a month. Disgraceful waste of tax payers money really. Wonder if the devs owned a bar before and are mates with Hancock.
yep, the political landscape here in the UK is awfully dismal.
 
Protecting health and saving lives is more important than blindly enforcing the rules. Apple & Google need to be more flexible.
I do not believe this is that simple.

If we say that health and saving lives is the most important value above everything else, our world should look very different from what it is now. Alcohol and unhealthy food should be banned today, walking 10 000 steps a day should be mandatory, maximum speed limit 20 mph.

Health is an important value, but we have already accepted that even there we can make compromises. Privacy is an important value, as well, and tracking puts these two values in conflict. Making that compromise is a matter of values, and there is no "of course" in the answer.
 
i’m not even sure why they need QR code’s or any other kind of database given how this Google/Apple API already handles telling users if they have been in proximity to somebody who has tested positive. Seems suspicious of the NHS and makes me wonder if this was a test case to stir political action against Apple.
 
The UK government is corrupt to its core and it shows through this shambled of a tracker app.

Why did they not use the Apple / Google tracking API from the start and there would have been no issues, no battery drain problems with the other app, and it would have worked for users who must travel between countries.

Moreover, they would have been able to implement it in weeks, instead of the months it took.

The fact is, there are some fat cats, getting even fatter (including Johnson).
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.