P.S. I'm not very familiar with how the VAT tax works.
Indeed.
P.S. I'm not very familiar with how the VAT tax works.
Which would be fine, except business' can claim VAT back.
The VAT Directive requires certain goods and services to be exempt from VAT (for example, postal services, medical care, lending, insurance, betting), and certain other goods and services to be exempt from VAT but subject to the ability of an EU member state to opt to charge VAT on those supplies (such as land and certain financial services). Input VAT that is attributable to exempt supplies is not recoverable, although a business can increase its prices so the customer effectively bears the cost of the 'sticking' VAT (the effective rate will be lower than the headline rate and depend on the balance between previously taxed input and labour at the exempt stage).
Last I checked, UK prices (without VAT) are higher than US prices (without Tax) but a noticeable margin. Now I know Apple is not charity nor are they known for affordable products. But couldn't they just have absorbed the cost?
This may come back and bite them in the arse.
That makes sense, but after reading your comment I was interested so I did a little googling and I found out that what you said is true of *many* business costs, but is definitely NOT true for a very significant amount of business costs, and this definitely must account for a significant portion of Apple's higher prices in the UK.
That makes sense, but after reading your comment I was interested so I did a little googling and I found out that what you said is true of *many* business costs, but is definitely NOT true for a very significant amount of business costs, and this definitely must account for a significant portion of Apple's higher prices in the UK.
Quote from wiki:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Value_added_tax#European_Union
People complain about 20% VAT.... where I am from (brazil) the most basic macbook pro costs R$3800 (or $2300USD). And our public services are no were near as good as britain's :<
Now, Apple does have an increased cost of doing business due to other taxes, but VAT will be a negligible part of that.
No, you're wrong - and the quote you've quoted doesn't support your assertion (thigh I put in bold).
The system is specifically designed to avoid the double-charging of VAT.
Now, Apple does have an increased cost of doing business due to other taxes, but VAT will be a negligible part of that.
We don't have a VAT or national sales tax, but we, the US, really needs to have one. It's the only way for us to drive the deficit down.
A 10% across the board budget cut of all government departments?
When the VAT was dropped from 17.5% to 15% in 2009, I did NOT recall that Apple passed on the savings to consumers in the form of lower sale prices.
20% VAT is crazy high. No wonder people in the UK try to buy products via the underground.
JohnG
You could of course stop wasting money ... The best way to lower a deficit is to reduce spending and greatly increase jobs (proven throughout history). Taxes sound great but you actually reduce the number of jobs and end up breaking even or losing money.
Try 9.75% in California.
I don't recall apple lowering their prices when the VAT was temporarily reduced to 15% last year![]()
I am too self centered to worry about the UK. The UK is not me so obviously it doesn't matter