But they’re newly armed with one random piece of information - clearly that means they know the whole story, right?
And that piece of information, though accurate, didn’t even come from Cook!
But they’re newly armed with one random piece of information - clearly that means they know the whole story, right?
Well most people donate some percentage of their income to charity. Its just illustrates his income is a lot more then us. Still its a wonderful gesture.![]()
Do I expect that the IRS (and the states of a charity's registration) don't just take anyone's word for whether an entity meets legal and fiscal standards to qualify for charitable contributions? Of course I do.
![]()
What Is a Qualified Charitable Organization?
A qualified charitable organization is a nonprofit organization that qualifies for tax-exempt status according to the U.S. Treasury.www.investopedia.com
Past that, how is it my concern that anyone directs personal charitable contributions to a particular 501(c)(3) organization? I appreciate the freedom to make such contributions as I wish, and so respect others' freedom to do that as well.
Tim just gave 5% of his NET WORTH to charity. I mean, with my net worth, I'll have to give several thousands of dollars to charity to match the ratio he is giving. I can't do that. That's a lot of money, even for Tim. It's not anywhere near Bill Gates or Warren Buffett. But it's still a very generous act.
because there was a lot of knee jerk money going to “charities” that weren’t appropriating the money the way the purported to. id like to know where the money went before praising anyone about their ‘public’ but not public donation. IOW, he knew this would make the press.
I understand he wants to do this in a tax advantageous manner but it seems like he could give away more than $5 million per year if the plan is the give away almost all of his wealth.
Hmmm. Isn’t this a tax break? He could always cash in the stock options and make a private donation that doesn’t require any public disclosure.
That’s not the Cook way though is it? He‘s always keen to be seen doing the right thing. Appearances matter.
An annual 5 mill is back of the sofa money for Tim, and it also doesn’t align with his statement about giving away the “vast majority” of his wealth, given his age.
Now that Tim Apple is a billionaire, gotta buy those tax breaks by donating to "charities" that fit his ideology
I wish he would start building things in the United States and innovating. He's no Steve Jobs, that's for sure.
Fantastic.
Very nice of him.
This is probably as if I were to donate a dollar.
But nice anyway.
It's a tax break plus PR, besides $5million is like toilet paper to him
Not really. $5M is a lot more than $1.
Wait, so you're just envious of the press attention? Okay then...
As far as appropriate use of the contribution by the recipient, it's pretty hard for me to think the donor of a large pile of money wouldn't have an accountant who makes use of the publicly available tools that measure a charity's handling of its finances relative to other 501(c)(3) entities.
"Following the donation, Cook continues to hold 837,374 shares of Apple stock worth $422 million."
Yah, not that we should be "bragging", but especially for those of us with outstanding loans such as school loans and no major property/investments, our net worth is essentially nil.Most people actually have a negative net worth.
envious? Where did you get that from? It’s clear that he did this in a way that would be recognized publicly without him releasing something himself.
if you think his accountant was telling him what charity to donate to I think you are mistaken. There have been a lot of ‘smart’ people donating to charities that have been less than moral with the use of the money. That was my original point. It’s clear you want to believe it was to a good cause, all I’m saying is no one but he really knows, and if you’re going to do this in that way, why not make that public too?