Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Well most people donate some percentage of their income to charity. Its just illustrates his income is a lot more then us. Still its a wonderful gesture. ;)

Probably the most down to earth comment on the board.

Others are also ignoring the massive wealth Tim has made shareholders since his inception. If any CEO has actually -made- their money he’s in the list.
 
Do I expect that the IRS (and the states of a charity's registration) don't just take anyone's word for whether an entity meets legal and fiscal standards to qualify for charitable contributions? Of course I do.


Past that, how is it my concern that anyone directs personal charitable contributions to a particular 501(c)(3) organization? I appreciate the freedom to make such contributions as I wish, and so respect others' freedom to do that as well.

because there was a lot of knee jerk money going to “charities” that weren’t appropriating the money the way the purported to. id like to know where the money went before praising anyone about their ‘public’ but not public donation. IOW, he knew this would make the press.
 
Tim just gave 5% of his NET WORTH to charity. I mean, with my net worth, I'll have to give several thousands of dollars to charity to match the ratio he is giving. I can't do that. That's a lot of money, even for Tim. It's not anywhere near Bill Gates or Warren Buffett. But it's still a very generous act.

That's philosophically incorrect - unless your human needs scale proportionally with income:
Does Tim Cook require 100000x as many calories as you do (food expenses?), does he need a toilet that is 100000x larger?
How about a house, or does his car need to go 100000x faster? The hypothetical education of his kids - would that cost 100000x more?
No?

Then the comparison of " I'll have to give several thousands of dollars to charity to match the ratio he is giving. I can't do that. That's a lot of money, even for Tim." is ridiculous.
 
because there was a lot of knee jerk money going to “charities” that weren’t appropriating the money the way the purported to. id like to know where the money went before praising anyone about their ‘public’ but not public donation. IOW, he knew this would make the press.

Wait, so you're just envious of the press attention? Okay then...

As far as appropriate use of the contribution by the recipient, it's pretty hard for me to think the donor of a large pile of money wouldn't have an accountant who makes use of the publicly available tools that measure a charity's handling of its finances relative to other 501(c)(3) entities.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CarlJ
It always gets on my nerves when people are nasty about rich people donating money to charity. This is like looking a gift horse in the mouth.

Be bloody glad that GOOD people like Tim Cook, Bill Gates, Zuckerberg and so forth DO donate money to charity: I know I am as I, myself, don't have any money to donate (well, I do donate a bag of old clothes once in a while).
 
Last edited:
I understand he wants to do this in a tax advantageous manner but it seems like he could give away more than $5 million per year if the plan is the give away almost all of his wealth.

Throw the first stone and all.
 
Hmmm. Isn’t this a tax break? He could always cash in the stock options and make a private donation that doesn’t require any public disclosure.

Feel free to do it better than him. Donation is donation.
 
That’s not the Cook way though is it? He‘s always keen to be seen doing the right thing. Appearances matter.

An annual 5 mill is back of the sofa money for Tim, and it also doesn’t align with his statement about giving away the “vast majority” of his wealth, given his age.

He didn’t ever specify when he’ll give it all away though, right? Let’s focus on the positive then, not that many donations in that ballpark happen I guess.
 
I wish he would start building things in the United States and innovating. He's no Steve Jobs, that's for sure.

He executes Steve’s plan to the smallest degree it seems. Today’s Apple producing it all in China and elsewhere is a Steve achievement.
 
Well, while I acknowledge this and applaud it, I'd rather had Apple pay fair taxes and not using legally-allowed, but morally questionable measures to reduce taxes. I pay two full months of my gross income as direct taxes, the indirect ones not included. How much of the total gross income of Apple goes back to the world's societies as taxes? 5%? 1%? or even less? I need to investigate this...
 
Wait, so you're just envious of the press attention? Okay then...

As far as appropriate use of the contribution by the recipient, it's pretty hard for me to think the donor of a large pile of money wouldn't have an accountant who makes use of the publicly available tools that measure a charity's handling of its finances relative to other 501(c)(3) entities.

envious? Where did you get that from? It’s clear that he did this in a way that would be recognized publicly without him releasing something himself.

if you think his accountant was telling him what charity to donate to I think you are mistaken. There have been a lot of ‘smart’ people donating to charities that have been less than moral with the use of the money. That was my original point. It’s clear you want to believe it was to a good cause, all I’m saying is no one but he really knows, and if you’re going to do this in that way, why not make that public too?
 
Thats very nice of him to give back especially on a yearly basis, $5M can do a lot in different projects...imagine how many schools in Africa, water wells, FOSS projects, saving animals, publishing books, forestation...

I don't understand though why many people try to create the biggest wealth possible and then give it all away, like Buffet and Jobs and now Cook.

"Following the donation, Cook continues to hold 837,374 shares of Apple stock worth $422 million."

I thought he was worth $1B...?
 
Most people actually have a negative net worth.
Yah, not that we should be "bragging", but especially for those of us with outstanding loans such as school loans and no major property/investments, our net worth is essentially nil.

People forget how big numbers really are. If this guy actually is worth a billion, that means earning $100,000, 10,000 times. How many lifetimes would most people need to accumulate that? But for these people, their life is a numbers game. A normal person would have stopped working after they hit 10mil or maybe even 100. But that's why we aren't running multinational companies and instead sitting at our office desk and making armchair comments on MacRumors forums 😅
 
  • Like
Reactions: Baymowe335
envious? Where did you get that from? It’s clear that he did this in a way that would be recognized publicly without him releasing something himself.

if you think his accountant was telling him what charity to donate to I think you are mistaken. There have been a lot of ‘smart’ people donating to charities that have been less than moral with the use of the money. That was my original point. It’s clear you want to believe it was to a good cause, all I’m saying is no one but he really knows, and if you’re going to do this in that way, why not make that public too?

There are tax advantages to donating appreciated shares rather than cash (or the proceeds of share sales). That's mostly likely why he has made some donations in the form of shares, even though he knows that there are reporting requirements relating to such donations.
 
  • Like
Reactions: stevet and LizKat
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.