Because those are "rinse and repeat" projects. Make the chip faster. Make the chip smaller. Squeeze the chip into this new device. I suspect that if he leaves for another company, it's because that company is giving him the opportunity to build something truly new and different, something he isn't able to do at Apple.I agree with the first part.
But Apple are hardly doing "rinse and repeat". They've just transitioned the Mac to Apple Silicon and are working on AR glasses. If it's a new ambitious hardware project he's after, why does't that satisfy?
Guys, not everything is a conspiracy.
This stock manipulation concept has no credibility to it.
I disagree. Apple stock prices often fluctuate when these rumours appear in the news. So much so that the majority of my Apple stock purchases also coincide with these news reports as I’m always buying on the dips.
I doubt that’s a coincidence. Add in the sleazy nature of Wall Street and it’s easy to believe that the intent of many of these news reports is to make someone money.
It’s not just a problem for Apple. Stock manipulation has been around forever.
So it's now back to "Apple needs a product guy leading the company". Until the next unsourced rumor pops up causing many here going non-linear saying Apple is doomed.
Exactly my point. Apple has painted itself into a corner with its privacy stance. They can't deliver competitive AI and voice assistant technologies because of this, but if they weaken their stance at all, customers like you will revolt.Privacy is one of the reasons I’m still staying within the Apple ecosystem.
And? When people talk about bubbles, they're talking about money, not technology. Even if AI is a bubble and that bubble bursts tomorrow, the technology doesn't go away. Look at the legendary late 90s "dot com bubble". Sure, a lot of companies went belly up, but it's not like the internet went away. Quite the opposite.More and more people believe that it’s a huge bubble that will pop rather sooner than later.
But they do, major software and hardware releases every year. Major CPU, GPU, cellular and connectivity chip releases every year. Apple is the true tech company of the Mag 7The software engineers don't deliver record profits every quarter.
Nobody is holding a gun to Tim's head and forcing him to release major updates yearly.
Sounds to me like fake news got a reality kickSounds like a new pay package got worked out.
Crisis averted.
Yet YOU insist that Srouji did this as a “pay increase” tactic, which is just a plain rumor in itselfCity -- you are asking for the impossible.
Rumor sources are not ever going to be publicly outed, and most especially when it involves C-Suite activity at Apple.
You're way too intelligent to not understand that.
The stock is basically flat right now. Naturally John Gruber is dunking on him but Gurman did link to his original story. And he’s the one reporting this leaked memo so…The question is did he run with bad information or did Apple shove a bunch of money in Srouji’s face and now he’s decided to stay? Who knows.It obviously doesn’t matter, because whatever he says gets trusted out of the gate even when he’s been blatantly wrong time and time again. The needle moved on the stock, just as planned.
He’s not leaving according to a memo leaked to….Mark Gurman, the guy who reported he was thinking of leaving.He's not leaving.
The article needs an update or a new thread.
He’s not leaving according to a memo leaked to….Mark Gurman, the guy who reported he was thinking of leaving.
It's not just young people. Plenty of people of all ages think Apple's privacy obsession is out of touch and a huge tech problem for the company. It's obviously the reason they can't build competitive AI and voice assistant technologies.This is an under discussed point about the younger generations and their lack of enthusiasm on the privacy angle.
Plenty of people have realized that, despite a lot of chicken littles screaming that the sky is falling over privacy (for decades), things aren't so bad.
Well you didn’t agree from the start, because I said no one is irreplaceable.Agreed until you said software.
Srouji is SVP of Hardware, which is a division that kills it.
This would be a blow.
In what ways? This is exactly my problem with the privacy argument. It's more about vibes and feels than actual data. You think people aren't up to speed? In what ways? Clearly you must have something concrete in mind, or are you just operating on vibes and feels too? What implications have people not considered? How are their lives measurably worse or less secure?I'm not sure that's true. I think folks just aren't up to speed and thinking about the implications of all the privacy violations and how they actually do impact them in many ways, large & small.
In what ways? This is exactly my problem with the privacy argument. It's more about vibes and feels than actual data. You think people aren't up to speed? In what ways? Clearly you must have something concrete in mind, or are you just operating on vibes and feels too? What implications have people not considered? How are their lives measurably worse or less secure?
Personally I think all the privacy talk is largely marketing nonsense and a lot of people have fallen for it. Again, show me any evidence of massive privacy-related problems outside of the Apple ecosystem. There isn't any.
Forgot about this, great point.IBM also owns Red Hat, which is one of the biggest players in the Linux market (probably the biggest in enterprise).
But I also don't really want these AI features integrated into the operating system. What Microsoft does and plans for example is a reason to move away from Windows for me.Exactly my point. Apple has painted itself into a corner with its privacy stance. They can't deliver competitive AI and voice assistant technologies because of this, but if they weaken their stance at all, customers like you will revolt.
Meanwhile, all the other tech companies are running circles around Apple with these emerging technologies and Apple hasn't delivered the improved Siri they promised years ago.
Exactly.I mean, we all want to believe the fairytale, but Jobs wanted the same thing, making money, while it is true that if you make good product people will want it, believing Jobs was all about change people’s lives it is simply silly.
He wanted to sell just as much as TC, he just had a different vision on how to achieve it.