Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
There are obviously more false positives than lives saved, taking much needed resources away from actual accidents. Otherwise, it wouldn’t be a topic of conversation. Do you understand?
Can you provide the stats? It’s not as if the daily car crash numbers in the US are zero per day.
 
They’re adding track detection for workouts maybe they could add some sport detection to turn this feature off at places like ski hills, amusement parks & the ocean?
 
They should only make it detect crashes when connected to CarPlay.
What exactly does that improve, the likeliness of being in a car when reported or just being in a CarPlay enabled car, which probably excludes tons of vehicles still on the road.
 
  • Like
Reactions: compwiz1202
With their $‘s they should have at least 50k trained internal employees or contractors testing their stuff, and not just a hand full.

Personally i stopped reporting bugs a long time ago, they don’t care anyway. Their bug reporting portal is a black hole.
What is their bug reporting portal?
 
this, plus a switch in control center like we have for water lock in AW or Low power mode / flashlight on iPhones.
You are completely right, should be disabled by default and turned on demand by people for certain time - calendar item, focus time or set time.
Exactly. Let me switch it on when I plan my accident.
 
I always had a feeling that skiers in the NE were bad.

😉
 
It’s much more common than you think. Not as common as a flying roller coaster crashing into a 1979 Buick Regal, but still.

48173DFF-A4A1-4A39-BB82-0B0806C5A438.jpeg
 
This is serious. There are people that are suffering from this half baked feature. Apple must withdraw the feature from general use immediately. It's not even close to ready. Would it take a documented death for Apple to withdraw this feature?
Not just A documented death. We’d need more than a dozen to actually raise the alarm in Apple and/or Apple facing massive legal pressure worldwide to withdraw this feature. The problem is, it is very difficult to prove the death is directly caused by overwhelmed false alarms by fake crash detection, and Apple will get away with all of these unscathed.
 
  • Disagree
Reactions: I7guy
Banana Hardware/Software mature at customer‘s site, if it ever mature.

They should sue Apple for wasting limited life saving resources.
Why sue Apple? Sue the user for not using it correct. The only thing I would do as Apple is not having it on as default.
 
  • Like
Reactions: compwiz1202
Why sue Apple? Sue the user for not using it correct. The only thing I would do as Apple is not having it on as default.
Yep, for the default on and for burying it in a way in users don't even know that they can turn it completely off.
And specially since they are aware of the problem, they should have disabled it already with an iOS update, till they find a reliable solution.

Wasting life saving resources is unacceptable.
 
  • Disagree
  • Like
Reactions: LD517 and I7guy
Yep, for the default on and for burying it in a way in users don't even know that they can turn it completely off.
And specially since they are aware of the problem, they should have disabled it already with an iOS update, till they find a reliable solution.

Wasting life saving resources is unacceptable.
Not saving a life when there are solutions to saving a life are also unacceptable.
 
  • Like
Reactions: citysnaps
Yea... They can tell them how many calls were false alarms and how many were as intended. They can tell them how many calls they get and at what times and many more things relevant to troubleshoot the issue.

That is a good point. They can tell Apple how many more false calls they are getting this winter vs last winter. That will give Apple some idea of how severe this issue is (and what kind of liability the company could be facing).
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.