Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

MacRumors

macrumors bot
Original poster
Apr 12, 2001
68,714
39,655


Apple today shared a new App Store study that it commissioned from economists at Analysis Group, with the report highlighting the success of third-party developers on the App Store. The study comes as Apple is facing concerns about the prioritization and dominance of its apps on the App Store as well as regulatory pressure to open up iOS to sideloading and alternate app store options.

iOS-App-Store-General-Feature-Sqaure-Complement.jpg

Apple's aim is to offer up facts on the ecosystem the App Store has created and the content that developers are creating for it. The first part of the study focuses on the numerous ways that developers can reach consumers outside of the App Store, through non-iOS devices like other smartphones, PCs, and consoles and through other digital marketplaces.

app-store-billings.jpg

The second part of the study focuses on the growth of the App Store over time (there are now 1.8 million apps), 99.9 percent of which are third-party apps as the study is quick to point out that Apple has just 60 apps that are competing with third-party apps.

The final part of the study focuses on the breadth of third-party apps that are available as alternatives to Apple-created apps, and it points out that for many categories like social networks, food, travel planning, and dating services, third-party apps are the only option as Apple does not compete in these categories. It also points out that across most app types, Apple's apps are "eclipsed in popularity and account for a relatively small share of usage."

top-apps-across-types-of-apps.jpg

As an example, the top apps in each App Store category are listed and compared against Apple apps. In the U.S., Spotify is 1.6x more popular than Apple Music among Apple users in terms of daily active users or time spent in the app, and Netflix is 17x more popular than Apple TV+, and Apple's share among TV apps has never exceeded four percent in the countries included in the study. "Apple's own apps are rarely the most popular app of a particular type, and account for a small share of app usage," reads the report.

Apple's share of most app categories falls below 40 percent, according to the study, and is often lower. When it comes to communication apps like Phone, Messages, and others, Apple has a 41 percent share in the U.S. because it competes with WhatsApp, Messenger, Instagram, and others, and for the maps category, it has a 36 percent share. In the TV category, it has a three percent share, and in the reading category, it has an eight percent share.

apple-app-share-among-top-apps.jpg

The study takes a deep dive into several app categories where Apple competes, including communication, reading, music streaming, mapping, TV and video streaming, games, health and fitness, and news.

iphone-music-top-streaming-services.jpg
Average listening time per day by iPhone users​

Apple in the newsroom article on the study pulls out several specific report highlights that it found notable:
  • Third-party apps are the only options for consumers for entire types of apps, including social networking, dating services, travel planning, and food and drink.
  • Leaders in app types often vary across countries, with many regional leaders outperforming their globally competitive counterparts.
  • Third-party apps are the most popular among iPhone users in most regions for major app types, including music streaming, TV and movie streaming, reading, communication, and mapping apps.
  • Across many app types, Apple's own apps account for a relatively small share of app usage among iPhone users. This is the case even though some Apple apps are preinstalled to enable core functionality of the device.
  • iPhone users often use multiple apps within a single category, especially apps for communicating, reading the news, watching videos, or navigating -- underscoring how easily users can switch between apps and the breadth of opportunity for developers.
Apple also uses the newsroom article to point out the wide range of tools that it makes available to developers, along with the investments that it makes in the "next generation of developers" with tools like Everyone Can Code, App Development in Swift, and Swift Playgrounds.

Apple said that it does not expressly plan to provide this data to regulators like those developing the Digital Markets Act in Europe, but it is a public study and the company hopes regulators will take notice of the data and facts made available.

All of the data used for the study was sourced from Data.Ai (App Annie), and it looked at metrics like active users, time spent in apps, and total number of downloads. Though the data was... Click here to read rest of article

Article Link: Apple-Commissioned Study Highlights Success of Third-Party Apps
 
Last edited:
  • Haha
Reactions: dk001 and sinoka56
Apple puts all these metrics up about how "few" apps Apple has that compete with third party apps.

What Apple neglects to mention is that they control the OS that the apps run on, and Apple's apps have special access to the OS and to each other that third party apps do not have. Apple's apps can do things that third party apps cannot, because Apple says so.

Apple: if this huge competitive advantage didn't exist in the first place, you would never need a study to point out that 60 apps is not a lot compared to 1.8 million.

It is a such pointless and insulting study, because at any time Apple can squash any app by making their own version, that is better, and is only better because it can do things Apple won't allow the third party version to do.
 
Apple too late. The regulatory bodies have already decided the ios app store belongs to the people. RIP.
Last I checked Apple still has control of their App Store. They’re just going have to stop preventing consumers from installing software from other sources or stores. If I buy a PS5 from Walmart, Walmart can’t tell me I’m not allowed to get software for it from Target, Amazon, or Best Buy.
 
No one is suggesting Apple shouldn’t be able to run their own app store.
I think this is to refute the argument that "Apple plays favorites".

Most of these apps don't even have in-app purchases enabled so they're not paying Apple any % of revenue on iOS in the first place.

I do think there is work to be done so non-Apple apps have the same access to system resources like email, calendars, music playing, messaging, etc rather than being forced into their own sandbox. But there's a lot of privacy issues and several of these apps are outright spyware on Android unless you go to extreme measures to throttle them. That's a bit of an oxymoron though... apps complain they are "sandboxed" from services like Siri, yet at the same time they go out of their way not to pay Apple anything. So why would Apple spend money to supply them better?
 
  • Like
Reactions: turbineseaplane
Apple too late. The regulatory bodies have already decided the ios app store belongs to the people. RIP.
And the end result will be worse for everyone. I blame Apple, frankly. They could have headed this off a hundred different ways and controlled the experience better for everyone. In the end they'll be forced to do things that don't make sense.
 
Last I checked Apple still has control of their App Store. They’re just going have to stop preventing consumers from installing software from other sources or stores. If I buy a PS5 from Walmart, Walmart can’t tell me I’m not allowed to get software for it from Target, Amazon, or Best Buy.
That's not really analogous. If you buy a PS5, can you play open source PS5 games made by anyone? No, you can only play officially sanctioned PS5 games.
 
The truth is that, aside from their own services (Apple TV+, Apple Music, etc.), Apple is happy to let you use third party apps paid for through the App Store. They do no work on the apps, they maintain the storefront, and they make 15%-30% off of every app that is sold/subscribed to. This is the main reason that Apple doesn’t want other App Stores. It’s not to protect their own apps, but to protect the revenue from the third party apps from which they gladly take a cut.
 
This whole situation is so frustrating and really worries me for the long term future of Apple overall.

A great company needs to be able to better read the room at this point and adjust accordingly.

Just endlessly digging in on their iOS App Store distribution and revenue collection monopoly is not the path for the future, nor is it forward looking and it sure as hell isn't responsive to the overall vibe around this topic around the world from consumers, governments and many developers.

Open up and LEAD please Apple.

Show us you're more than just a rent collection operation.
 
This whole situation is so frustrating and really worries me for the long term future of Apple overall.

A great company needs to be able to better read the room at this point and adjust accordingly.

Just endlessly digging in on their iOS App Store distribution and revenue collection monopoly is not the path for the future, nor is it forward looking and it sure as hell isn't responsive to the overall vibe around this topic around the world from consumers, governments and many developers.

Open up and LEAD please Apple.

Show us you're more than just a rent collection operation.
It also breeds complacency and laziness. Why continue to innovate when you can just skim off the top from everyone else to boost your profits?
 
Last I checked Apple still has control of their App Store. They’re just going have to stop preventing consumers from installing software from other sources or stores. If I buy a PS5 from Walmart, Walmart can’t tell me I’m not allowed to get software for it from Target, Amazon, or Best Buy.
Exactly. The App Store belongs to the people not Apple. We have different definitions of what "control" really means.
 
This whole situation is so frustrating and really worries me for the long term future of Apple overall.

A great company needs to be able to better read the room at this point and adjust accordingly.

Just endlessly digging in on their iOS App Store distribution and revenue collection monopoly is not the path for the future, nor is it forward looking and it sure as hell isn't responsive to the overall vibe around this topic around the world from consumers, governments and many developers.

Open up and LEAD please Apple.

Show us you're more than just a rent collection operation.
Let them skim and collect rent. I only care if my share price starts going down.
 
Apple too late. The regulatory bodies have already decided the ios app store belongs to the people. RIP.
Meanwhile the people decided they want an App Store like the one Apple offers. If the regulatory bodies cared about the people they would nullify software licenses and convert them to ownership, ban in app purchases, and require all bugs be fixed before a new paid version can be released. They would hold developers financially responsible for promising feature that are never released
No one is suggesting Apple shouldn’t be able to run their own app store.
That’s exactly what they are suggesting.
 
In 2015 Coca-Cola commissioned studies on whether sugar in soft drinks was a contributing factor to our obesity epidemic. Guess what the results were?


To its credit at least Apple is forthcoming about financing its study.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.