Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
No
It's the petty and vindictive response by Apple ... to regulations decided upon by the people (by proxy) in that region.

Apple gets no pass for acting like a whiny and greedy child who didn't get everything they wanted.
I'm sorry you are 100% wrong here. You clearly didn't read it, at all. Apple had little reason to support web apps as much as they did before because it is a very low volume sport, and to continue to offer them in a way that was compliant with the nonsense DMA would have required a massive overall of web app support, which isn't justified on their end.
 
As a citizen of the EU I was against the EU for all this bull**** regulations. The Type-C, DMA, etc. This made me change my mind. Apple is acting like a toddler that couldn't get its way and now its revenging on everyone.
 
They were forced to break this feature. Put yourself in Apple’s shoes. The government is saying you have no right to have any competitive advantages despite the fact your product makes up a minority of sales, and if you leave a feature intact that other browsers don’t get to have, that is a violation of the law. Apple is being forced to spend engineering time ADDING a feature that hardly anyone uses. They had two alternatives: they could remove the feature or they could add it for other browsers. One takes no time at all (probably just toggling a flag in software) while the other takes up time that could be spent working on stuff that people actually use. it’s a no-brainer. As a retired software engineer, Apple’s option is what I would have recommended. If PWA’s were widely used, I would recommend doing the other alternative.
If PWA's were more widely used, they would have. It's that simple.
 
As a citizen of the EU I was against the EU for all this bull**** regulations. The Type-C, DMA, etc. This made me change my mind. Apple is acting like a toddler that couldn't get its way and now its revenging on everyone.
Maybe you should try reading and understanding it then, because this is not what you think it is.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I'm sorry you are 100% wrong here. You clearly didn't read it, at all. Apple had little reason to support web apps as much as they did before because it is a very low volume sport, and to continue to offer them in a way that was compliant with the nonsense DMA would have required a massive overall of web app support, which isn't justified on their end.
The entire thing its just bad for them.

1st, they can't make a simple feature that's available in Android with every browser engine? 2nd they just decided to remove in every browser on iOS, including Safari?

This is clearly a revenge on the consumer by Apple.
 
Maybe you should try reading and understanding it then, because this is not what you think it is.
No I can't understand what they did. Even if they state it would make it less secure it's clearly a lie. Android is considered more secure by security experts and has both sideloading and allows all browser engines.

Them saying WebKit is safer than Chromium it's just insane, worse that people believe them.
 
No, they chose not to waste millions in engineering resources to please a small (to Apple) market that's penalizing them for existing.
Europe is Apple's 2nd biggest market (yes, currently even bigger than China). So you're quite wrong here.

It's been very clear from the reactions by Epic, Spotify, and others, that they wanted to have their cake and eat it too, and now that they've realized that isn't going to happen, they've decided to blame Apple for not rolling over and saying "Please sir, may I have another kick in the head?"
This is major misunderstanding of the DMA. It really was not created on Epic, Spotify or others call. I get where this view comes from, but that's really not how EU or DMA specifically works.
 
  • Love
Reactions: Lyrics23
They were forced to break this feature. Put yourself in Apple’s shoes. The government is saying you have no right to have any competitive advantages despite the fact your product makes up a minority of sales,

That the key part that I call BS on. Minority of sales (less than 50%) While less than 50% they still are well over 30% over all and if you move it just upper middle class and up it gets even closer to 50. The other big part is they are part of the duopoly. Top it off Apple is using its massive mark power in the mobile OS to leverage its power in other markets.
Limiting everyone to say Webkit is not a market advantage for anything but webkit. The bigger part is Apple using its massive power in one market to squeeze others out in different markets.
If Apple had like sub 10% and was not part of the duopoly it would be a different story.
All in all I think the bigger problem is it took way to long for the regulations to kick in and start being put in place. Google, Apple and other big companies need to be pulled back a long time ago.
 
It always fascinates me on this and other topics to see so many of you who think that Apple owes you something you want just because what? Apple is a business. You make a choice. You want what they are offering or you don’t. It really is that simple. The idea that the EU is going to dictate exactly how Apple should operate is a silly notion. Apple should absolutely protect their business and their IP.

This “Apple is being childish” says more about the critics than it does about Apple. Apple is operating as a business. And I choose to support them because I like the business choices they make.
 
Android is considered more secure by security experts and has both sideloading and allows all browser engines.
Can you point me to security experts saying Android is more secure than iOS?

 
Actually I'm already seeing how much is the trade in of my iPhone 15 Pro 256gb for a S24 Ultra. I will think about hard before doing the switch.
Maybe but the post from the OP kind of reads like, OK you must drop everything Apple right now.
 
I would rather have PWA than alternative app stores and side loading. I need PWA and notifications for MacRumors and C!-!@turb8t€.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Roadstar
It always fascinates me on this and other topics to see so many of you who think that Apple owes you something you want just because what? Apple is a business. You make a choice. You want what they are offering or you don’t. It really is that simple. The idea that the EU is going to dictate exactly how Apple should operate is a silly notion. Apple should absolutely protect their business and their IP.

This “Apple is being childish” says more about the critics than it does about Apple. Apple is operating as a business. And I choose to support them because I like the business choices they make.
I think Apple is just one of those companies that has certain subsets of customers... Not many other companies in the world have a set of customers that fill message boards like these with very strong opinions and emotions... for some people Apple is more than a business.

I think for many people... they forget that Apple are just a business... it exists to make money for shareholders.... thats its sole purpose... it doesnt do this out of charity or vocation (Some of its workers might). And a company doesnt really care about you as an individual... it only cares about you as a customer. And it will make decisions that have this at its core... its priority is as a business.
 
not sure why anyone is freaking out here..how many people really use web apps? They're usually not very good and now they're open to go to these alternative stores and perhaps provide their customers better apps instead.
 
Petty and vindictive

Modern Apple in a nutshell

"would require building an entirely new integration architecture that does not currently exist in iOS and was not practical to undertake given the other demands of the DMA and the very low user adoption of Home Screen web apps. "

It's Apple being rational.

Very few customers will stop or start buying iPhones because of the removal of this. The user's can still use web apps.Building a new integration architecture is just going to bring Apple cost and implementation risks.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
No I can't understand what they did. Even if they state it would make it less secure it's clearly a lie. Android is considered more secure by security experts and has both sideloading and allows all browser engines.

Them saying WebKit is safer than Chromium it's just insane, worse that people believe them.
Your comment is not even on topic.
 
The entire thing its just bad for them.

1st, they can't make a simple feature that's available in Android with every browser engine? 2nd they just decided to remove in every browser on iOS, including Safari?

This is clearly a revenge on the consumer by Apple.
I'm sorry but you just don't understand what this is talking about at all, and I don't have the energy to explain it to you.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.