Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Retail Price to go up?

Wow. Due to earthquakes, etc., Apple may have to raise prices to the consumers.

I'm so glad that (for some reason) the iPad is the only Apple product in which I have no interest in acquiring.
 
This just in, Apple to enact use of "Supply and Demand" when building their product. Tonight at 11.
 
with all due respect.......... your 2011 ipad will arrive in 2013 costing $2000 more, after huge lobbying with KFC eating trade union members

...snip...

Unlikely. The labor contribution to an iPad in China is pretty small. If you build these in the US it might add on the order of $25 to $50 to the price, (my rough estimate).
 
This would cost more for Apple, but considering they're willing to pay suppliers more to ensure production, I think it wouldn't be such a bad idea if a California company actually produced product in California as well :(

Sure, move production from above one fault zone to above another fault zone...not a bad idea at all.
 
Unlikely. The labor contribution to an iPad in China is pretty small. If you build these in the US it might add on the order of $25 to $50 to the price, (my rough estimate pulled out of thin air with no research or basis other then it sounded good to me at the moment).

Fixed that for you.
 
+1. Unionized labor isn't that expensive and I know I'd feel better knowing that my purchase wasn't responsible for a rash of suicides. Do you actually feel good knowing that your purchase is responsible for a company installing an anti-suicide net?

Doesn't bother me one bit... It's not OUR fault foreign countries have screwed up labor laws...
I still haven't seen an iPad 2 in person. Really want to try one out.

iPad2 is pretty sweet compared to iPad1...you'll love it...
 
The long-term impact of the disaster here in Japan both on our economy and that of the world cannot be underestimated. Japanese businesses — everything from touch-panel manufacturers to the tiniest mom-and-pop operations — are already beginning to feel the pinch.
 
And even then, the premium wouldn't be so bad when we are providing more jobs, thus getting or economy back on track and people making more money.

Maybe if americans spent less time waiting in line for days to buy apple products and spent more time doing productive work the economy wouldnt be so bad
 
The long-term impact of the disaster here in Japan both on our economy and that of the world cannot be underestimated. Japanese businesses — everything from touch-panel manufacturers to the tiniest mom-and-pop operations — are already beginning to feel the pinch.

It really is a global economy and we are all in it together. If one country hurts, we all feel it in some way. Best wishes for all the people in your country for a quick recovery.
 
You're not the only one who feels this way, my friend!! I am always willing to pay a premium for quality, which along with the customer support experience, is why I buy Apple. I would likewise be willing to pay for quality, American-made products, knowing that I'm keeping my fellow neighbors healthy as well.

The issue is, when push comes to shove, most people would not be willing to pay the significantly higher fee apple would have to charge. Think about this: If you wanted FULL construction in the USA, that would mean that samsung would have to construct the CPUs here, qualcomm would have to design their chips here too, as well as all the other component manufacturers involved with iProducts. That would increase the price on EACH component of an iProduct by a bit, and then apple has to make money, so the final product also being created here would have to cost more, on top of the increase for all the other components. We're talking possibly a thousand dollars for a base model of iPad. Nobody would pay that, or at least, I should hope.
 
With all their billions in cash and billions of income and their penchant for vertical integration, why is Apple messing around with these long term component supply contracts? Why don't they just buy or build their own factories?
 
With all their billions in cash and billions of income and their penchant for vertical integration, why is Apple messing around with these long term component supply contracts? Why don't they just buy or build their own factories?

This^ If apple were to invest in their own factories, there would be far fewer leaks. I think it's a safe bet that the majority of leaks come out of foxconn.
 
With all their billions in cash and billions of income and their penchant for vertical integration, why is Apple messing around with these long term component supply contracts? Why don't they just buy or build their own factories?
Because they tried it before and learned that they aren't good at it. As a matter of fact, they did such a p*ss poor job, they almost went out of business.

Apple is best at systems design, not component manufacturing. In a way, it's like they're better chefs than farmers.
 
This would cost more for Apple, but considering they're willing to pay suppliers more to ensure production, I think it wouldn't be such a bad idea if a California company actually produced product in California as well :(

Yeah. And Exxon should only sell US oil. And Citibank, Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley should only have US legal entities subject to US tax. And all your food should be grown by US farmers. And your cars should only be made using US workers and US materials.

Or perhaps, if you want Capitalism, you let your companies thrive by maximizing shareholder wealth, by keeping costs as low as possible. I'm no fan of Capitalism and I dislike the fact that I make my money from it, but I know of no better system: nor can I conceive of one.

You can regulate for risk and greed, but not for nationalism. If you want to make your country competitive, then you need the right taxation, skills and investment. Countries that regulate for national interest are trying to get the best of both worlds and that's not cricket.
 
Last edited:
Yeah. And Exxon should only sell US oil. And Citibank, Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley should only have US legal entities subject to US tax. And all your food should be grown by US farmers. And your cars should only be made using US workers and US materials.

Or perhaps, if you want Capitalism, you let your companies thrive by maximizing shareholder wealth, by keeping costs as low as possible. I'm no fan of Capitalism and I dislike the fact that I make my money from it, but I know of no better system: nor can I conceive of one.

You can regulate for risk and greed, but not for nationalism. If you want to make your country competitive, then you need the right taxation, skills and investment. Countries that regulate for national interest are trying to get the best of both worlds and that's not cricket.

Capitalism has its problems, but unfortunately the biggest problem is our own government. Like you said, it's the best system out there, but when we're regulated to death and have taxes shoved up our butt left and right, it makes doing business hard... Less regulation and lower taxes is the key to encouraging companies to make their products here, so, if people want their products made in the USA, vote for the right person next election.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.