Apple Corps lose lawsuit against Apple Computer

Discussion in 'MacRumors News Discussion (archive)' started by MacRumors, May 8, 2006.

  1. MacRumors macrumors bot


    Apr 12, 2001

    The BBC reports that the Apple Corps have lost their lawsuit against Apple Computer. Mr Justice Edward Mann, the presiding judge on the case, ruled that Apple Computer used its Apple logo in association with its store and not the music itself, and was therefore not in breach of trademark agreements made in previous decades.

    According to the BBC, Apple Corps is planning to appeal the case.
  2. Dont Hurt Me macrumors 603

    Dont Hurt Me

    Dec 21, 2002
    Yahooville S.C.
    Good thing , this was nothing but some greedy lawyers chasing the ambulance.
  3. ctango macrumors member


    Feb 28, 2006
    Let's keep that one part our secret.

    Don't tell Steve about the "creative" part.
  4. Dagless Suspended


    Jan 18, 2005
    Fighting to stay in the EU
  5. Atlasland macrumors 6502

    Aug 20, 2005
    London, UK
    This is great news for Apple (obviously).

    And, for my money, quite unexpected.

    I thought Apple Corps were sure to win.

    It seems they lost on quite a technical point.
  6. bwintx macrumors 6502


    Jul 17, 2002
    Outstanding, but Apple Corpse (and that spelling is intentional) obviously will drag this out in the appeals process unless Apple Computer comes up with $$$ to make the former go away. Which is all Apple Corpse probably ever wanted anyway.
  7. gkhaldi macrumors regular

    Feb 6, 2005
    Yes! Good news. This was a suit with no merit!
  8. SPUY767 macrumors 68020


    Jun 22, 2003
    Apple Corpse has run out of ways to re-release the Beatle's recordings and is therefore in desperate need of revenue.
  9. Goliath macrumors regular


    Jul 28, 2004
    This is a good thing- Apple corps. have recieved millions in the past for the use of 'Apple'. They have had more than their fair share of reparations for the use of the term Apple in relation to music
  10. Doga macrumors regular


    Dec 15, 2003
    Near Montréal, Canada
    Heh heh, nice play on words. :p

    I too was thinking the plaintiff would win so I'm pleasantly surprised and pleased by the ruling.
  11. steve_hill4 macrumors 68000


    May 15, 2005
    NG9, England
    I think this could be both good and bad news. Good news for obvious reasons, bad news as it may delay the Beatles back catalogue entering the iTMS. If indeed all that was requested was a removal of the Apple logo from the store, I can't see it having changed the store itself much.

    Since they are going to appeal, I wouldn't expect any Apple Corps related music to appear on there for some time yet.
  12. thefunkymunky macrumors 65816

    Feb 24, 2005
    Why don't Apple Corpse re-release the Beatles back catalogue on iTunes.:rolleyes: :eek:
  13. sishaw macrumors 65816


    Jan 12, 2005
    Another way to look at the lawsuit?

    We've been hearing for a while that Apple (the Beatles' music company) has been remastering the Beatles' catalogue in order to make it available on iTunes. Is it possible that this lawsuit helps clear the way by eliminating any possible future legal claims between Apple Corp. and Apple Inc.?

    Has anyone heard of an appeal being filed by Apple Corp.? If not, I would wonder how "adversarial" the lawsuit really was.

    Edit: My bad. I see there is an appeal. Man, I hope that doesn't mean we have to wait for the appeals process to see Beatles songs on iTunes/
  14. coumerelli macrumors 6502

    Apr 7, 2003
    state of confusion.

    Thank you Captain Obvious.
  15. mi5moav macrumors regular

    Mar 12, 2004
    I think the 91' agreement allowed the Mac(Apple) to play and manipulate or edit music if I recall... but not create music. So, the ipod and itunes so, guess this fell through the cracks. I guess we won't be seeing ikaraoke from Apple anytime soon. Apple Corps will be sure to find a judget that doesn't own and ipod next time... since they all have a bit of that kool-aid in them now.
  16. coumerelli macrumors 6502

    Apr 7, 2003
    state of confusion.

    reread the post, if you will...
  17. intlplby macrumors member

    Jul 14, 2004
    that's not true...... they could license the Dr. Ebbett's Sound Studio discs (DESS) and release them..... truly great mastering

    they should also release the Abbey Road Black Triangle disc from Japan again and the Canadian Disque Americ Help and Rubber Soal discs. The Sgt Pepper's UHQR is a good find too as is the stereo German Metal Master of the White Album.

    there's a bunch more, but these are the best masterings of the Beatles and most people have never heard them..... they sound much better than the typical releases.... some are bootlegs some are official discs..... for example the DESS ones are bootleg masterings from virgin vinyl.... the disque americ were accidental production of the original stereo masters and were quickly stopped

    forget any itunes remastering, get the above remasterings that i mentioned.
  18. Applespider macrumors G4


    Jan 20, 2004
    looking through rose-tinted spectacles...
    No... they're involved in a new Cirque du Soleil show in Vegas which is Beatle-themed and which they're expected to make a great deal of dosh from.

    I really don't think there's much danger of Apple computers getting any benefit from a consumer thinking they are Apple Corps - if anything these days, Apple Corps would gain.

    One thing I was curious about and which didn't seem to come up in the case was that Apple do 'create' music with their Live in London series where they record an artist's gig and make it exclusive to iTunes. But it is clear when you go back and check the iTMS, how often the Apple logo appears in iTunes or on iPods but how seldom in the Music Store itself which is obviously intentional
  19. Sonofhaig macrumors regular

    Jan 16, 2003
    Greenvale, NY
    Does Apple Corp. have to pay court expenses?
    This was a total waste of time....... Just lawyers adding to their wealth.
    Dear God, I hate Lawyers. Please send them all to hell. Please?
  20. rt_brained macrumors 6502a

    Jan 13, 2002
    And now, for the coups de gras, Steve Jobs will buy the rights to the Beatles music library from cash-strapped Michael Jackson and feature Beatles music in every iPod commercial from now to infinity.
  21. aswitcher macrumors 603


    Oct 8, 2003
    Canberra OZ
    Good outcome. Pity about the wasted time and expense. How soon before the beetles hit iTunes? ;)
  22. Platform macrumors 68030


    Dec 30, 2004
    Good news......go Apple....wait who...Apple Computer :p
  23. generik macrumors 601


    Aug 5, 2005
    Only ONE Apple is relevant in 2006, Apple Computers :rolleyes:

    Good bye Beetles, we've got RAID :D
  24. joesporleder macrumors newbie

    Jul 18, 2002
    Apples & Apples

    I don't always buy into SJ's reality distortion field (unless it's something I just have to have! <grin>), but I do agree with his sentiments quoted in the story. I wish Apple Computer and Apple Corps could focus on a business agreement that is a winning situation for both. I remember reading on a Mac message board somewhere that Yoko Ono would be willing to sell out for $1 billion. Of the 4, sounds like John Lennon's estate might be the toughest holdout for Apple Computer to form a business agreement or buyout with Apple Corps.

  25. Boggle macrumors 6502


    The best part is, the beatles will have to pay for Apple's legal costs. I wish they'd adopt that system in the US. It would put a stop to all those frivilous law suits of ppl seeking fast money in out-of-court settlements, such as. "I'm suing you b/c I have color induced stress disorder and your front door is the wrong shade of blue. Give me 5 million dollars & I'll get better."

Share This Page